* Introduce X-macro-based trace tag definition
- Created trace_tags.def to centralize TRACE tag definitions
- Each tag includes a symbolic name and description
- Set up enum class TraceTag for type-safe usage in TRACE macros
* Add script to generate Markdown documentation from trace_tags.def
- Python script parses trace_tags.def and outputs trace_tags.md
* Refactor TRACE_NEW to prepend TraceTag and pass enum to is_trace_enabled
* trace: improve trace tag handling system with hierarchical tagging
- Introduce hierarchical tag-class structure: enabling a tag class activates all child tags
- Unify TRACE, STRACE, SCTRACE, and CTRACE under enum TraceTag
- Implement initial version of trace_tag.def using X(tag, tag_class, description)
(class names and descriptions to be refined in a future update)
* trace: replace all string-based TRACE tags with enum TraceTag
- Migrated all TRACE, STRACE, SCTRACE, and CTRACE macros to use enum TraceTag values instead of raw string literals
* trace : add cstring header
* trace : Add Markdown documentation generation from trace_tags.def via mk_api_doc.py
* trace : rename macro parameter 'class' to 'tag_class' and remove Unicode comment in trace_tags.h.
* trace : Add TODO comment for future implementation of tag_class activation
* trace : Disable code related to tag_class until implementation is ready (#7663).
gc-ing definitions leads to unsoundness when they are not replayed.
Instead of attempting to replay definitions theory internalization is irredundant by default.
This is also the old solver behavior where TH_LEMMA is essentially never used, but is valid for top-level theory lemmas.
move self-checking functionality to inside sat/smt so it can be used on-line and not just off-line.
when self-validation fails, use vs, not clause, to check. It allows self-validation without checking and maintaining RUP validation.
new options sat.smt.proof.check_rup, sat.smt.proof.check for online validation.
z3 sat.smt.proof.check=true sat.euf=true /v:1 sat.smt.proof.check_rup=true /st file.smt2 sat.smt.proof=p.smt2
This commit overhauls the proof format (in development) for the new core.
NOTE: this functionality is work in progress with a long way to go.
It is shielded by the sat.euf option, which is off by default and in pre-release state.
It is too early to fuzz or use it. It is pushed into master to shed light on road-map for certifying inferences of sat.euf.
It retires the ad-hoc extension of DRUP used by the SAT solver.
Instead it relies on SMT with ad-hoc extensions for proof terms.
It adds the following commands (consumed by proof_cmds.cpp):
- assume - for input clauses
- learn - when a clause is learned (or redundant clause is added)
- del - when a clause is deleted.
The commands take a list of expressions of type Bool and the
last argument can optionally be of type Proof.
When the last argument is of type Proof it is provided as a hint
to justify the learned clause.
Proof hints can be checked using a self-contained proof
checker. The sat/smt/euf_proof_checker.h class provides
a plugin dispatcher for checkers.
It is instantiated with a checker for arithmetic lemmas,
so far for Farkas proofs.
Use example:
```
(set-option :sat.euf true)
(set-option :tactic.default_tactic smt)
(set-option :sat.smt.proof f.proof)
(declare-const x Int)
(declare-const y Int)
(declare-const z Int)
(declare-const u Int)
(assert (< x y))
(assert (< y z))
(assert (< z x))
(check-sat)
```
Run z3 on a file with above content.
Then run z3 on f.proof
```
(verified-smt)
(verified-smt)
(verified-smt)
(verified-farkas)
(verified-smt)
```
