The only difference between "RTLIL" and "ILANG" is that the latter is
the text representation of the former, as opposed to the in-memory
graph representation. This distinction serves no purpose but confuses
people: it is not obvious that the ILANG backend writes RTLIL graphs.
Passes `write_ilang` and `read_ilang` are provided as aliases to
`write_rtlil` and `read_rtlil` for compatibility.
As per suggestion made in https://github.com/YosysHQ/yosys/pull/1987, now:
RTLIL::wire holds an is_signed field.
This is exported in JSON backend
This is exported via dump_rtlil command
This is read in via ilang_parser
The parser changes are slightly awkward. Consider the following IL:
process $0
<point 1>
switch \foo
<point 2>
case 1'1
assign \bar \baz
<point 3>
...
case
end
end
Before this commit, attributes are valid in <point 1>, and <point 3>
iff it is immediately followed by a `switch`. (They are essentially
attached to the switch.) But, after this commit, and because switch
cases do not have an ending delimiter, <point 3> becomes ambiguous:
the attribute could attach to either the following `case`, or to
the following `switch`. This isn't expressible in LALR(1) and results
in a reduce/reduce conflict.
To address this, attributes inside processes are now valid anywhere
inside the process: in <point 1> and <point 3> a part of case body,
and in <point 2> as a separate rule. As a consequence, attributes
can now precede `assign`s, which is made illegal in the same way it
is illegal to attach attributes to `connect`.
Attributes are tracked separately from the parser state, so this
does not affect collection of attributes at all, other than allowing
them on `case`s. The grammar change serves purely to allow attributes
in more syntactic places.
