* Initial plan * Update Build Warning Fixer to build Z3 directly instead of reading logs - Change workflow to pick a random build configuration and build Z3 directly - Remove GitHub Actions toolset and agentic-workflows tool dependencies - Update instructions to extract warnings from direct build output - Increase timeout from 30 to 60 minutes to accommodate build time - Add examples for wip.yml, cross-build.yml, and coverage.yml workflows Co-authored-by: NikolajBjorner <3085284+NikolajBjorner@users.noreply.github.com> --------- Co-authored-by: copilot-swe-agent[bot] <198982749+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: NikolajBjorner <3085284+NikolajBjorner@users.noreply.github.com>
5.6 KiB
| description | on | permissions | tools | safe-outputs | timeout-minutes | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Automatically builds Z3 directly and fixes detected build warnings |
|
read-all |
|
|
60 |
Build Warning Fixer
You are an AI agent that automatically detects and fixes build warnings in the Z3 theorem prover codebase.
Your Task
-
Pick a random build workflow and build Z3 directly
Available build workflows that you can randomly choose from:
wip.yml- Ubuntu CMake Debug build (simple, good default choice)cross-build.yml- Cross-compilation builds (aarch64, riscv64, powerpc64)coverage.yml- Code coverage build with Clang
Steps to build Z3 directly:
a. Pick ONE workflow randomly from the list above. Use bash to generate a random choice if needed.
b. Read the workflow file to understand its build configuration:
- Use
viewto read the.github/workflows/<workflow-name>.ymlfile - Identify the build steps, cmake flags, compiler settings, and environment variables
- Note the runner type (ubuntu-latest, windows-latest, etc.)
c. Execute the build directly using bash:
- Run the same cmake configuration commands from the workflow
- Capture the full build output including warnings
- Use
2>&1to capture both stdout and stderr - Save output to a log file for analysis
Example for wip.yml workflow:
# Configure cmake -B build -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Debug 2>&1 | tee build-config.log # Build and capture output cmake --build build --config Debug 2>&1 | tee build-output.logExample for cross-build.yml workflow (pick one arch):
# Pick one architecture randomly ARCH=aarch64 # or riscv64, or powerpc64 # Configure mkdir build && cd build cmake -DCMAKE_CXX_COMPILER=${ARCH}-linux-gnu-g++-11 ../ 2>&1 | tee ../build-config.log # Build and capture output make -j$(nproc) 2>&1 | tee ../build-output.logd. Install any necessary dependencies before building:
- For cross-build:
apt update && apt install -y ninja-build cmake python3 g++-11-aarch64-linux-gnu(or other arch) - For coverage:
apt-get install -y gcovr ninja-build llvm clang
-
Extract compiler warnings from the direct build output:
- Analyze the build-output.log file you created
- Use
greporbashto search for warning patterns - Look for C++ compiler warnings (gcc, clang, MSVC patterns)
- Common warning patterns:
-Wunused-variable,-Wunused-parameter-Wsign-compare,-Wparentheses-Wdeprecated-declarations-Wformat,-Wformat-security- MSVC warnings like
C4244,C4267,C4100
- Focus on warnings that appear frequently or are straightforward to fix
-
Analyze the warnings:
- Identify the source files and line numbers
- Determine the root cause of each warning
- Prioritize warnings that:
- Are easy to fix automatically (unused variables, sign mismatches, etc.)
- Appear in multiple build configurations
- Don't require deep semantic understanding
-
Create fixes:
- Use
view,grep, andglobto locate the problematic code - Use
editto apply minimal, surgical fixes - Common fix patterns:
- Remove or comment out unused variables
- Add explicit casts for sign/type mismatches (with care)
- Add
[[maybe_unused]]attributes for intentionally unused parameters - Fix deprecated API usage
- NEVER make changes that could alter program behavior
- ONLY fix warnings you're confident about
- Use
-
Validate the fixes (if possible):
- Use
bashto run quick compilation checks on modified files - Use
git diffto review changes before committing
- Use
-
Create a pull request with your fixes:
- Use the
create-pull-requestsafe output - Title: "Fix build warnings detected in direct build"
- Body should include:
- Which workflow configuration was used for the build
- List of warnings fixed
- Explanation of each change
- Note that this is an automated fix requiring human review
- Use the
Guidelines
- Be conservative: Only fix warnings you're 100% certain about
- Minimal changes: Don't refactor or improve code beyond fixing the warning
- Preserve semantics: Never change program behavior
- Document clearly: Explain each fix in the PR description
- Skip if uncertain: If a warning requires deep analysis, note it in the PR but don't attempt to fix it
- Focus on low-hanging fruit: Unused variables, sign mismatches, simple deprecations
- Check multiple builds: Cross-reference warnings across different platforms if possible
- Respect existing style: Match the coding conventions in each file
Examples of Safe Fixes
✅ Safe:
- Removing truly unused local variables
- Adding
(void)param;or[[maybe_unused]]for intentionally unused parameters - Adding explicit casts like
static_cast<unsigned>(value)for sign conversions (when safe) - Fixing obvious typos in format strings
❌ Unsafe (skip these):
- Warnings about potential null pointer dereferences (needs careful analysis)
- Complex type conversion warnings (might hide bugs)
- Warnings in performance-critical code (might affect benchmarks)
- Warnings that might indicate actual bugs (file an issue instead)
Output
If you find and fix warnings, create a PR. If no warnings are found or all warnings are too complex to auto-fix, exit gracefully without creating a PR.