Add commands:
(prefer <formula>)
- will instruct case split queue to assign formula to true.
- prefer commands added within a scope are forgotten after leaving the scope.
(reset-preferences)
- resets asserted preferences. Has to be invoked at base level.
This provides functionality related to MathSAT and based on an ask by Tomáš Kolárik who is integrating the functionality with OpenSMT2
* Introduce X-macro-based trace tag definition
- Created trace_tags.def to centralize TRACE tag definitions
- Each tag includes a symbolic name and description
- Set up enum class TraceTag for type-safe usage in TRACE macros
* Add script to generate Markdown documentation from trace_tags.def
- Python script parses trace_tags.def and outputs trace_tags.md
* Refactor TRACE_NEW to prepend TraceTag and pass enum to is_trace_enabled
* trace: improve trace tag handling system with hierarchical tagging
- Introduce hierarchical tag-class structure: enabling a tag class activates all child tags
- Unify TRACE, STRACE, SCTRACE, and CTRACE under enum TraceTag
- Implement initial version of trace_tag.def using X(tag, tag_class, description)
(class names and descriptions to be refined in a future update)
* trace: replace all string-based TRACE tags with enum TraceTag
- Migrated all TRACE, STRACE, SCTRACE, and CTRACE macros to use enum TraceTag values instead of raw string literals
* trace : add cstring header
* trace : Add Markdown documentation generation from trace_tags.def via mk_api_doc.py
* trace : rename macro parameter 'class' to 'tag_class' and remove Unicode comment in trace_tags.h.
* trace : Add TODO comment for future implementation of tag_class activation
* trace : Disable code related to tag_class until implementation is ready (#7663).
* add prd
Signed-off-by: Nikolaj Bjorner <nbjorner@microsoft.com>
* missing text
Signed-off-by: Nikolaj Bjorner <nbjorner@microsoft.com>
* fix
Signed-off-by: Nikolaj Bjorner <nbjorner@microsoft.com>
* fix#7647
* fix#7647 - with respect to scope level
* initial stab at randomizer
Signed-off-by: Nikolaj Bjorner <nbjorner@microsoft.com>
* Create prd.yml
* missing text
Signed-off-by: Nikolaj Bjorner <nbjorner@microsoft.com>
* fix
Signed-off-by: Nikolaj Bjorner <nbjorner@microsoft.com>
* Update prd.yml
* allows setting simplifier factory independently of whether solver has been allocated.
Instances, such as #7484 can be solved faster by either having authors rewrite benchmarks or by using incremental pre-processing. You can add incremental pre-processing to the SMT solver by using the command
```
(set-simplifier (then simplify propagate-values solve-eqs elim-unconstrained simplify))
```
This command can be invoked any time prior to push or adding assertions.
The effect of the command is that it adds an incremental pre-processing pass to check-sat invocations that is potentially more powerful than the default pre-processing. The default pre-processing functionality is not touched mainly to avoid instability against functionality that is already built around its behavior.
* remove experiment from pr
---------
Signed-off-by: Nikolaj Bjorner <nbjorner@microsoft.com>
An initial update to support polymorphism from SMTLIB3 and the API (so far C, Python).
The WIP SMTLIB3 format is assumed to be supporting the following declaration
```
(declare-type-var A)
```
Whenever A is used in a type signature of a function/constant or bound quantified variable, it is taken to mean that all instantiations of A are included in the signature and assertions.
For example, if the function f is declared with signature A -> A, then there is a version of f for all instances of A.
The semantics of polymorphism appears to follow previous proposals: the instances are effectively different functions.
This may clash with some other notions, such as the type signature forall 'a . 'a -> 'a would be inhabited by a unique function (the identity), while this is not enforced in this version (and hopefully never because it is more busy work).
The C API has the function 'Z3_mk_type_variable' to create a type variable and applying functions modulo polymorphic type signatures is possible.
The kind Z3_TYPE_VAR is added to sort discriminators.
This version is considered as early alpha. It passes a first rudimentary unit test involving quantified axioms, declare-fun, define-fun, and define-fun-rec.
Add the ability to customize incremental pre-processing simplification for the SMTLIB2 front-end. The main new capability is to use pre-processing tactics in incremental mode that were previously not available. The main new capabilities are
- solve-eqs
- reduce-args
- elim-unconstrained
There are several more. Documentation and exposed simplifiers are populated incrementally. The current set of supported simplifiers can be inspected by using z3 with the --simplifiers flag or referring to https://microsoft.github.io/z3guide/docs/strategies/simplifiers
Some pending features are:
- add the ability to update parameters to simplifiers similar to how tactics can be controlled using parameters.
- expose simplification solvers over the binary API.
This commit overhauls the proof format (in development) for the new core.
NOTE: this functionality is work in progress with a long way to go.
It is shielded by the sat.euf option, which is off by default and in pre-release state.
It is too early to fuzz or use it. It is pushed into master to shed light on road-map for certifying inferences of sat.euf.
It retires the ad-hoc extension of DRUP used by the SAT solver.
Instead it relies on SMT with ad-hoc extensions for proof terms.
It adds the following commands (consumed by proof_cmds.cpp):
- assume - for input clauses
- learn - when a clause is learned (or redundant clause is added)
- del - when a clause is deleted.
The commands take a list of expressions of type Bool and the
last argument can optionally be of type Proof.
When the last argument is of type Proof it is provided as a hint
to justify the learned clause.
Proof hints can be checked using a self-contained proof
checker. The sat/smt/euf_proof_checker.h class provides
a plugin dispatcher for checkers.
It is instantiated with a checker for arithmetic lemmas,
so far for Farkas proofs.
Use example:
```
(set-option :sat.euf true)
(set-option :tactic.default_tactic smt)
(set-option :sat.smt.proof f.proof)
(declare-const x Int)
(declare-const y Int)
(declare-const z Int)
(declare-const u Int)
(assert (< x y))
(assert (< y z))
(assert (< z x))
(check-sat)
```
Run z3 on a file with above content.
Then run z3 on f.proof
```
(verified-smt)
(verified-smt)
(verified-smt)
(verified-farkas)
(verified-smt)
```
Adding new API object to maintain state between calls to parser.
The state is incremental: all declarations of sorts and functions are valid in the next parse. The parser produces an ast-vector of assertions that are parsed in the current calls.
The following is a unit test:
```
from z3 import *
pc = ParserContext()
A = DeclareSort('A')
pc.add_sort(A)
print(pc.from_string("(declare-const x A) (declare-const y A) (assert (= x y))"))
print(pc.from_string("(declare-const z A) (assert (= x z))"))
print(parse_smt2_string("(declare-const x Int) (declare-const y Int) (assert (= x y))"))
s = Solver()
s.from_string("(declare-sort A)")
s.from_string("(declare-const x A)")
s.from_string("(declare-const y A)")
s.from_string("(assert (= x y))")
print(s.assertions())
s.from_string("(declare-const z A)")
print(s.assertions())
s.from_string("(assert (= x z))")
print(s.assertions())
```
It produces results of the form
```
[x == y]
[x == z]
[x == y]
[x == y]
[x == y]
[x == y, x == z]
```
Thus, the set of assertions returned by a parse call is just the set of assertions added.
The solver maintains state between parser calls so that declarations made in a previous call are still available when declaring the constant 'z'.
The same holds for the parser_context_from_string function: function and sort declarations either added externally or declared using SMTLIB2 command line format as strings are valid for later calls.
