- only the internalizer performs closure conversion
- theory_array treats propagation of lambdas similar to stores
- ho_matcher treats top-level flex patterns as first-order
- pattern-inference fix to handle quantifiers (lambdas) in patterns that are computed
This change wires SMT-LIB Hilbert choice parsing to a concrete
array-theory operator and ensures both array backends enforce the
expected semantic axiom. Previously, `(choice ((x T)) phi)` parsed as
NYI and had no solver-side instantiation path.
- **Parser: lower `choice_k` into array `OP_CHOICE`**
- `pop_quant_frame(choice_k)` now builds `(choice p)` instead of
throwing.
- Added parser include/use of array utilities to construct the term
directly from the generated lambda predicate.
- **Array decl plugin: add `OP_CHOICE` typing + surface syntax**
- Added declaration support for `choice` with signature:
- `(Array T Bool) -> T` (encoded as `('a -> Bool) -> 'a` in HO view).
- Added recognizer/util helpers (`is_choice`, `mk_choice`) and exposed
`"choice"` in op names.
- **SMT array theory (`theory_array_full`): instantiate choice axiom**
- Added instantiation for each encountered `choice(p)`:
- `forall x . p(x) => p(choice(p))`
- Integrated into internalization/relevancy paths and statistics.
- **SAT/SMT array backend (`sat/smt/array_*`): instantiate choice
axiom**
- Added new axiom record kind for choice, internalization hook,
assertion routine, and diagnostics/stat tracking.
- Uses the same quantified implication schema as above.
- **Regression coverage**
- Extended SMT2 parser regression with an HO `choice` example to ensure
parser/eval pipeline accepts and processes choice terms.
Example of the now-supported input:
```smt2
(set-logic HO_ALL)
(declare-sort U 0)
(declare-fun P () (-> U Bool))
(assert (exists ((x U)) (P x)))
(assert (= witness (choice ((x U)) (P x))))
```
---------
Co-authored-by: copilot-swe-agent[bot] <198982749+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
- add check for lambdas similar to as-array in context of quantifiers. MBQI is not a decision procedure for this combination and can then incorrectly conclude satisfiabiltiy.
Scenario
The formula contains assertions
- bv = (map or (lambda ..) t)
- forall y (not (select bv (pair s y)))
Since bv is extensionally equal to a term that depends on a lambda, MBQI cannot just take the current finite approximation of bv when checking the quantifier for satisfiability.
