mirror of
https://github.com/Z3Prover/z3
synced 2025-04-13 20:38:43 +00:00
revert changes in smt directory
Signed-off-by: Lev Nachmanson <levnach@hotmail.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
04f0a310a2
commit
9ecae4abad
|
@ -159,8 +159,8 @@ rational core::product_value(const unsigned_vector & m) const {
|
|||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// return true iff the monic value is equal to the product of the values of the factors
|
||||
bool core::check_monic(const monic& m) const {
|
||||
SASSERT(m_lar_solver.get_column_value(m.var()).is_int());
|
||||
bool core::check_monic(const monic& m) const {
|
||||
SASSERT((!m_lar_solver.column_is_int(m.var())) || m_lar_solver.get_column_value(m.var()).is_int());
|
||||
return product_value(m.vars()) == m_lar_solver.get_column_value_rational(m.var());
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -75,7 +75,6 @@ namespace smt {
|
|||
m_phase_default(false),
|
||||
m_conflict(null_b_justification),
|
||||
m_not_l(null_literal),
|
||||
m_empty_clause(false),
|
||||
m_conflict_resolution(mk_conflict_resolution(m, *this, m_dyn_ack_manager, p, m_assigned_literals, m_watches)),
|
||||
m_unsat_proof(m),
|
||||
m_dyn_ack_manager(*this, p),
|
||||
|
@ -2397,10 +2396,9 @@ namespace smt {
|
|||
m_unsat_proof = nullptr;
|
||||
}
|
||||
m_base_scopes.shrink(new_lvl);
|
||||
m_empty_clause = false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
else {
|
||||
m_conflict = m_empty_clause ? b_justification::mk_axiom() : null_b_justification;
|
||||
m_conflict = null_b_justification;
|
||||
m_not_l = null_literal;
|
||||
}
|
||||
del_clauses(m_aux_clauses, s.m_aux_clauses_lim);
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -193,7 +193,6 @@ namespace smt {
|
|||
// levels survives to the base level.
|
||||
b_justification m_conflict;
|
||||
literal m_not_l;
|
||||
bool m_empty_clause;
|
||||
scoped_ptr<conflict_resolution> m_conflict_resolution;
|
||||
proof_ref m_unsat_proof;
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -1346,15 +1346,13 @@ namespace smt {
|
|||
bool lemma = is_lemma(k);
|
||||
m_stats.m_num_mk_lits += num_lits;
|
||||
switch (num_lits) {
|
||||
case 0: {
|
||||
case 0:
|
||||
if (j && !j->in_region())
|
||||
m_justifications.push_back(j);
|
||||
TRACE("mk_clause", tout << "empty clause... setting conflict\n";);
|
||||
set_conflict(j == nullptr ? b_justification::mk_axiom() : b_justification(j));
|
||||
m_empty_clause = true;
|
||||
SASSERT(inconsistent());
|
||||
return nullptr;
|
||||
}
|
||||
case 1:
|
||||
if (j && !j->in_region())
|
||||
m_justifications.push_back(j);
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -165,7 +165,6 @@ class theory_lra::imp {
|
|||
ast_manager& m;
|
||||
theory_arith_params& m_arith_params;
|
||||
arith_util a;
|
||||
unsigned m_final_check_idx;
|
||||
arith_eq_adapter m_arith_eq_adapter;
|
||||
vector<rational> m_columns;
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -943,8 +942,7 @@ public:
|
|||
imp(theory_lra& th, ast_manager& m, theory_arith_params& ap):
|
||||
th(th), m(m),
|
||||
m_arith_params(ap),
|
||||
a(m),
|
||||
m_final_check_idx(0),
|
||||
a(m),
|
||||
m_arith_eq_adapter(th, ap, a),
|
||||
m_internalize_head(0),
|
||||
m_one_var(UINT_MAX),
|
||||
|
@ -999,7 +997,7 @@ public:
|
|||
return true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
else {
|
||||
TRACE("arith", tout << "Could not internalize " << mk_pp(atom, m) << "\n";);
|
||||
TRACE("arith", tout << "Could not internalize " << mk_pp(atom, m) << "\n";);
|
||||
found_not_handled(atom);
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -1653,16 +1651,13 @@ public:
|
|||
if (lp().get_status() != lp::lp_status::OPTIMAL) {
|
||||
is_sat = make_feasible();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
final_check_status st = FC_DONE;
|
||||
unsigned old_idx = m_final_check_idx;
|
||||
switch (is_sat) {
|
||||
case l_true:
|
||||
|
||||
if (delayed_assume_eqs()) {
|
||||
return FC_CONTINUE;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
TRACE("arith", display(tout););
|
||||
switch (check_lia()) {
|
||||
|
@ -1686,7 +1681,7 @@ public:
|
|||
st = FC_GIVEUP;
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (assume_eqs()) {
|
||||
if (assume_eqs()) {
|
||||
return FC_CONTINUE;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (m_not_handled != nullptr) {
|
||||
|
@ -1696,7 +1691,7 @@ public:
|
|||
|
||||
return st;
|
||||
case l_false:
|
||||
set_conflict();
|
||||
get_infeasibility_explanation_and_set_conflict();
|
||||
return FC_CONTINUE;
|
||||
case l_undef:
|
||||
TRACE("arith", tout << "check feasiable is undef\n";);
|
||||
|
@ -1705,7 +1700,6 @@ public:
|
|||
UNREACHABLE();
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
TRACE("arith", tout << "default giveup\n";);
|
||||
return FC_GIVEUP;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -2177,7 +2171,7 @@ public:
|
|||
for(const nla::lemma & l : lv) {
|
||||
m_lemma = l; //todo avoid the copy
|
||||
m_explanation = l.expl();
|
||||
m_stats.m_nla_explanations += static_cast<unsigned>(l.expl().size());
|
||||
m_stats.m_nla_explanations += l.expl().size();
|
||||
false_case_of_check_nla();
|
||||
}
|
||||
break;
|
||||
|
@ -2776,14 +2770,10 @@ public:
|
|||
bool sign = ub->get_bound_kind() != lp_api::upper_t;
|
||||
lit2 = literal(ub->get_bv(), sign);
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (ctx().get_assignment(lit2) == l_true) {
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
TRACE("arith",
|
||||
ctx().display_literal_verbose(tout, lit1);
|
||||
ctx().display_literal_verbose(tout << " => ", lit2) << "\n";
|
||||
tout << ctx().get_assignment(lit2) << " " << ctx().get_assignment(lit1) << "\n";
|
||||
);
|
||||
ctx().display_literal_verbose(tout << " => ", lit2);
|
||||
tout << "\n";);
|
||||
updt_unassigned_bounds(v, -1);
|
||||
++m_stats.m_bound_propagations2;
|
||||
m_params.reset();
|
||||
|
@ -2983,15 +2973,15 @@ public:
|
|||
auto vi = register_theory_var_in_lar_solver(b.get_var());
|
||||
rational bound = b.get_value();
|
||||
lp::constraint_index ci;
|
||||
TRACE("arith", tout << "v" << b.get_var() << ", vi = " << vi << "\n";);
|
||||
TRACE("arith", tout << "v" << b.get_var() << ", vi = " << vi;);
|
||||
if (is_int && !is_true) {
|
||||
rational bound = b.get_value(false).get_rational();
|
||||
ci = m_solver->add_var_bound(vi, k, bound);
|
||||
TRACE("arith", tout << "bound = " << bound << ", ci = " << ci << "\n";);
|
||||
TRACE("arith", tout << "\bbound = " << bound << ", ci = " << ci << "\n";);
|
||||
}
|
||||
else {
|
||||
ci = m_solver->add_var_bound(vi, k, b.get_value());
|
||||
TRACE("arith", tout << "bound = " << bound << ", ci = " << ci << "\n";);
|
||||
TRACE("arith", tout << "\nbound = " << bound << ", ci = " << ci << "\n";);
|
||||
}
|
||||
add_ineq_constraint(ci, literal(bv, !is_true));
|
||||
if (is_infeasible()) {
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue