mirror of
https://github.com/Z3Prover/z3
synced 2025-04-23 17:15:31 +00:00
change the signature of nla_solver::check() to accept lemma and explanation as vectors
Signed-off-by: Lev <levnach@hotmail.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
466586bf22
commit
9aca3bc239
5 changed files with 332 additions and 163 deletions
|
@ -2145,37 +2145,46 @@ public:
|
|||
return term;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
lbool check_aftermath_nla(lbool r) {
|
||||
switch (r) {
|
||||
case l_false: {
|
||||
literal_vector core;
|
||||
for (auto const& ineq : m_lemma) {
|
||||
bool is_lower = true, pos = true, is_eq = false;
|
||||
|
||||
switch (ineq.m_cmp) {
|
||||
case lp::LE: is_lower = false; pos = false; break;
|
||||
case lp::LT: is_lower = true; pos = true; break;
|
||||
case lp::GE: is_lower = true; pos = false; break;
|
||||
case lp::GT: is_lower = false; pos = true; break;
|
||||
case lp::EQ: is_eq = true; pos = false; break;
|
||||
case lp::NE: is_eq = true; pos = true; break;
|
||||
default: UNREACHABLE();
|
||||
}
|
||||
TRACE("arith", tout << "is_lower: " << is_lower << " pos " << pos << "\n";);
|
||||
app_ref atom(m);
|
||||
// TBD utility: lp::lar_term term = mk_term(ineq.m_poly);
|
||||
// then term is used instead of ineq.m_term
|
||||
if (is_eq) {
|
||||
atom = mk_eq(ineq.m_term, ineq.m_rs);
|
||||
}
|
||||
else {
|
||||
// create term >= 0 (or term <= 0)
|
||||
atom = mk_bound(ineq.m_term, ineq.m_rs, is_lower);
|
||||
}
|
||||
literal lit(ctx().get_bool_var(atom), pos);
|
||||
core.push_back(~lit);
|
||||
void false_case_of_check_nla() {
|
||||
literal_vector core;
|
||||
for (auto const& ineq : m_lemma) {
|
||||
bool is_lower = true, pos = true, is_eq = false;
|
||||
switch (ineq.m_cmp) {
|
||||
case lp::LE: is_lower = false; pos = false; break;
|
||||
case lp::LT: is_lower = true; pos = true; break;
|
||||
case lp::GE: is_lower = true; pos = false; break;
|
||||
case lp::GT: is_lower = false; pos = true; break;
|
||||
case lp::EQ: is_eq = true; pos = false; break;
|
||||
case lp::NE: is_eq = true; pos = true; break;
|
||||
default: UNREACHABLE();
|
||||
}
|
||||
TRACE("arith", tout << "is_lower: " << is_lower << " pos " << pos << "\n";);
|
||||
app_ref atom(m);
|
||||
// TBD utility: lp::lar_term term = mk_term(ineq.m_poly);
|
||||
// then term is used instead of ineq.m_term
|
||||
if (is_eq) {
|
||||
atom = mk_eq(ineq.m_term, ineq.m_rs);
|
||||
}
|
||||
else {
|
||||
// create term >= 0 (or term <= 0)
|
||||
atom = mk_bound(ineq.m_term, ineq.m_rs, is_lower);
|
||||
}
|
||||
literal lit(ctx().get_bool_var(atom), pos);
|
||||
core.push_back(~lit);
|
||||
}
|
||||
set_conflict_or_lemma(core, false);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
lbool check_aftermath_nla(lbool r, const vector<nla::lemma>& l,
|
||||
const vector<lp::explanation>& e) {
|
||||
switch (r) {
|
||||
case l_false: {
|
||||
SASSERT(l.size() == e.size());
|
||||
for(unsigned i = 0; i < l.size(); i++) {
|
||||
m_lemma = l[i];
|
||||
m_explanation = e[i];
|
||||
false_case_of_check_nla();
|
||||
}
|
||||
set_conflict_or_lemma(core, false);
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
case l_true:
|
||||
|
@ -2198,9 +2207,13 @@ public:
|
|||
if (!m_nra && !m_nla) return l_true;
|
||||
if (!m_switcher.need_check()) return l_true;
|
||||
m_a1 = nullptr; m_a2 = nullptr;
|
||||
m_explanation.clear();
|
||||
lbool r = m_nra? m_nra->check(m_explanation): m_nla->check(m_explanation, m_lemma);
|
||||
return m_nra? check_aftermath_nra(r) : check_aftermath_nla(r);
|
||||
if (m_nra) {
|
||||
m_explanation.clear();
|
||||
return check_aftermath_nra(m_nra->check(m_explanation));
|
||||
}
|
||||
vector<nla::lemma> l;
|
||||
vector<lp::explanation> e;
|
||||
return check_aftermath_nla(m_nla->check(e, l), l, e);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue