3
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/Z3Prover/z3 synced 2025-05-06 15:25:46 +00:00
z3/src/math/polysat/conflict.h
2022-12-16 14:25:41 +01:00

243 lines
9.1 KiB
C++

/*++
Copyright (c) 2021 Microsoft Corporation
Module Name:
polysat conflict
Author:
Nikolaj Bjorner (nbjorner) 2021-03-19
Jakob Rath 2021-04-06
Notes:
A conflict state is of the form <Vars, Constraints, Lemmas>
Where Vars are shorthand for the constraints v = value(v) for v in Vars and value(v) is the assignment.
Lemmas provide justifications for newly created constraints.
The conflict state is unsatisfiable under background clauses F.
Dually, the negation is a consequence of F.
Conflict resolution resolves an assignment in the search stack against the conflict state.
Assignments are of the form:
lit <- D => lit - lit is propagated by the clause D => lit
lit <- asserted - lit is asserted
lit <- Vars - lit is propagated from variable evaluation.
v = value <- D - v is assigned value by constraints D
v = value <- ? - v is a decision literal.
- All literals should be assigned in the stack prior to their use;
or justified by one of the side lemmas.
(thus: all literals in the core must have bvalue == l_true)
l <- D => l, < Vars, { l } u C > ===> < Vars, C u D >
l <- ?, < Vars, { l } u C > ===> ~l <- (C & Vars = value(Vars) => ~l)
l <- asserted, < Vars, { l } u C > ===> < Vars, { l } u C >
l <- Vars', < Vars, { l } u C > ===> < Vars u Vars', C > if all Vars' are propagated
l <- Vars', < Vars, { l } u C > ===> Mark < Vars, { l } u C > as bailout
v = value <- D, < Vars u { v }, C > ===> < Vars, D u C >
v = value <- ?, < Vars u { v }, C > ===> v != value <- (C & Vars = value(Vars) => v != value)
Example derivations:
Trail: z <= y <- asserted
xz > xy <- asserted
x = a <- ?
y = b <- ?
z = c <- ?
Conflict: < {x, y, z}, xz > xy > when ~O(a,b) and c <= b
Append x <= a <- { x }
Append y <= b <- { y }
Conflict: < {}, y >= z, xz > xy, x <= a, y <= b >
Based on: z <= y & x <= a & y <= b => xz <= xy
Resolve: y <= b <- { y }, y is a decision variable.
Bailout: lemma ~(y >= z & xz > xy & x <= a & y <= b) at decision level of lemma
With overflow predicate:
Append ~O(x, y) <- { x, y }
Conflict: < {}, y >= z, xz > xy, ~O(x,y) >
Based on z <= y & ~O(x,y) => xz <= xy
Resolve: ~O(x, y) <- { x, y } both x, y are decision variables
Lemma: y < z or xz <= xy or O(x,y)
--*/
#pragma once
#include "math/polysat/types.h"
#include "math/polysat/constraint_manager.h"
#include "math/polysat/inference_logger.h"
#include <initializer_list>
namespace polysat {
class solver;
class conflict_iterator;
class conflict_resolver;
class conflict {
solver& s;
scoped_ptr<inference_logger> m_logger;
scoped_ptr<conflict_resolver> m_resolver;
// current conflict core consists of m_literals and m_vars
indexed_uint_set m_literals; // set of boolean literals in the conflict; TODO: why not sat::literal_set
uint_set m_vars; // variable assignments used as premises, shorthand for literals (x := v)
unsigned_vector m_var_occurrences; // for each variable, the number of constraints in m_literals that contain it
uint_set m_vars_occurring; // set of variables that occur in at least one of the constraints in m_literals
// Lemmas that been accumulated during conflict resolution
clause_ref_vector m_lemmas;
// Store constraints that should be narrowed after backjumping.
// This allows us to perform propagations that are missed by the two-watched-variables scheme,
// e.g., because one of the watched variables is unassigned but irrelevant (e.g., x is irrelevant in x*y if y := 0).
sat::literal_vector m_narrow_queue;
// Level at which the conflict was discovered
unsigned m_level = UINT_MAX;
public:
conflict(solver& s);
~conflict();
inference_logger& logger();
void log_inference(inference const& inf) { logger().log(inf); }
bool empty() const;
/** Reset to "no conflict" state. This is only appropriate when conflict resolution is complete or aborted. */
void reset();
using const_iterator = conflict_iterator;
const_iterator begin() const;
const_iterator end() const;
uint_set const& vars() const { return m_vars; }
unsigned level() const { return m_level; }
bool is_relevant_pvar(pvar v) const;
bool is_relevant(sat::literal lit) const;
/** conflict due to obvious input inconsistency */
void init_at_base_level();
/** conflict because the constraint c is false under current variable assignment */
void init(signed_constraint c);
/** boolean conflict with the given clause */
void init(clause const& cl);
/** conflict because there is no viable value for the variable v, by interval reasoning */
void init_by_viable_interval(pvar v);
/** conflict because there is no viable value for the variable v, by fallback solver */
void init_by_viable_fallback(pvar v, univariate_solver& us);
bool contains(signed_constraint c) const { SASSERT(c); return contains(c.blit()); }
bool contains(sat::literal lit) const;
bool contains_pvar(pvar v) const { return m_vars.contains(v); }
bool pvar_occurs_in_constraints(pvar v) const { return v < m_var_occurrences.size() && m_var_occurrences[v] > 0; }
uint_set const& vars_occurring_in_constraints() const { return m_vars_occurring; }
/**
* Insert constraint c into conflict state.
*
* Skips trivial constraints:
* - e.g., constant constraints such as "4 > 1"
*/
void insert(signed_constraint c);
/** Insert assigned variables of c */
void insert_vars(signed_constraint c);
/** Evaluate constraint under assignment and insert it into conflict state. */
void insert_eval(signed_constraint c);
/** Add a side lemma to the conflict; to be learned in addition to the main lemma after conflict resolution finishes. */
void add_lemma(char const* name, std::initializer_list<signed_constraint> cs);
void add_lemma(char const* name, signed_constraint const* cs, size_t cs_len);
void add_lemma(char const* name, clause_ref lemma);
/** Remove c from core */
void remove(signed_constraint c);
void remove_var(pvar v);
/**
* Remove all constraints and variables from the conflict state.
* Use this during conflict resolution if the core needs to be replaced.
* (It keeps the conflict level and side lemmas.)
*/
void remove_all();
/** Perform boolean resolution with the clause upon the given literal. */
void resolve_bool(sat::literal lit, clause const& cl);
/** lit was evaluated under the assignment. */
void resolve_evaluated(sat::literal lit);
/** Perform resolution with "v = value <- ..." */
void resolve_value(pvar v);
/** Revert variable assignment, add auxiliary lemmas for the reverted variable */
void revert_pvar(pvar v);
/** Convert the core into a lemma to be learned. */
clause_ref build_lemma();
/** Move the accumulated lemmas out of the conflict */
clause_ref_vector take_lemmas();
clause_ref_vector const& lemmas() const { return m_lemmas; }
/** Move the literals to be narrowed out of the conflict */
sat::literal_vector take_narrow_queue();
std::ostream& display(std::ostream& out) const;
};
inline std::ostream& operator<<(std::ostream& out, conflict const& c) { return c.display(out); }
class conflict_iterator {
friend class conflict;
using inner_t = indexed_uint_set::iterator;
constraint_manager* m_cm;
inner_t m_inner;
conflict_iterator(constraint_manager& cm, inner_t inner):
m_cm(&cm), m_inner(inner) {}
static conflict_iterator begin(constraint_manager& cm, indexed_uint_set const& lits) {
return {cm, lits.begin()};
}
static conflict_iterator end(constraint_manager& cm, indexed_uint_set const& lits) {
return {cm, lits.end()};
}
public:
using value_type = signed_constraint;
using difference_type = std::ptrdiff_t;
using pointer = signed_constraint const*;
using reference = signed_constraint const&;
using iterator_category = std::input_iterator_tag;
conflict_iterator& operator++() {
++m_inner;
return *this;
}
signed_constraint operator*() const {
return m_cm->lookup(sat::to_literal(*m_inner));
}
bool operator==(conflict_iterator const& other) const {
return m_inner == other.m_inner;
}
bool operator!=(conflict_iterator const& other) const { return !operator==(other); }
};
}