mirror of
https://github.com/Z3Prover/z3
synced 2025-04-07 18:05:21 +00:00
162 lines
4.8 KiB
C++
162 lines
4.8 KiB
C++
|
|
|
|
#include"arith_bounds_tactic.h"
|
|
#include"assertion_set_util.h"
|
|
#include"arith_decl_plugin.h"
|
|
|
|
struct arith_bounds_tactic : public tactic {
|
|
|
|
ast_manager& m;
|
|
arith_util a;
|
|
volatile bool m_cancel;
|
|
|
|
arith_bounds_tactic(ast_manager& m):
|
|
m(m),
|
|
a(m),
|
|
m_cancel(false)
|
|
{
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
ast_manager& get_manager() { return m; }
|
|
|
|
void set_cancel(bool f) {
|
|
m_cancel = f;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
virtual void cleanup() {
|
|
m_cancel = false;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
virtual void operator()(/* in */ goal_ref const & in,
|
|
/* out */ goal_ref_buffer & result,
|
|
/* out */ model_converter_ref & mc,
|
|
/* out */ proof_converter_ref & pc,
|
|
/* out */ expr_dependency_ref & core) {
|
|
bounds_arith_subsumption(in, result);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
virtual tactic* translate(ast_manager& m) {
|
|
return alloc(arith_bounds_tactic, m);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
void checkpoint() {
|
|
if (m_cancel) {
|
|
throw tactic_exception(TACTIC_CANCELED_MSG);
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
struct info { rational r; unsigned idx; bool is_strict;};
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
\brief Basic arithmetic subsumption simplification based on bounds.
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
void mk_proof(proof_ref& pr, goal_ref const& s, unsigned i, unsigned j) {
|
|
if (s->proofs_enabled()) {
|
|
proof* th_lemma = m.mk_th_lemma(a.get_family_id(), m.mk_implies(s->form(i), s->form(j)), 0, 0);
|
|
pr = m.mk_modus_ponens(s->pr(i), th_lemma);
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
bool is_le_or_lt(expr* e, expr*& e1, expr*& e2, bool& is_strict) {
|
|
bool is_negated = m.is_not(e, e);
|
|
if ((!is_negated && (a.is_le(e, e1, e2) || a.is_ge(e, e2, e1))) ||
|
|
(is_negated && (a.is_lt(e, e2, e1) || a.is_gt(e, e1, e2)))) {
|
|
is_strict = false;
|
|
return true;
|
|
}
|
|
if ((!is_negated && (a.is_lt(e, e1, e2) || a.is_gt(e, e2, e1))) ||
|
|
(is_negated && (a.is_le(e, e2, e1) || a.is_ge(e, e1, e2)))) {
|
|
is_strict = true;
|
|
return true;
|
|
}
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
void bounds_arith_subsumption(goal_ref const& g, goal_ref_buffer& result) {
|
|
info inf;
|
|
rational r;
|
|
goal_ref s(g); // initialize result.
|
|
obj_map<expr, info> lower, upper;
|
|
expr* e1, *e2;
|
|
TRACE("arith_subsumption", s->display(tout); );
|
|
for (unsigned i = 0; i < s->size(); ++i) {
|
|
checkpoint();
|
|
expr* lemma = s->form(i);
|
|
bool is_strict = false;
|
|
bool is_lower = false;
|
|
if (!is_le_or_lt(lemma, e1, e2, is_strict)) {
|
|
continue;
|
|
}
|
|
// e1 <= e2 or e1 < e2
|
|
if (a.is_numeral(e2, r)) {
|
|
is_lower = true;
|
|
}
|
|
else if (a.is_numeral(e1, r)) {
|
|
is_lower = false;
|
|
}
|
|
else {
|
|
continue;
|
|
}
|
|
proof_ref new_pr(m);
|
|
|
|
if (is_lower && upper.find(e1, inf)) {
|
|
if (inf.r > r || (inf.r == r && is_strict && !inf.is_strict)) {
|
|
mk_proof(new_pr, s, i, inf.idx);
|
|
s->update(inf.idx, m.mk_true(), new_pr);
|
|
inf.r = r;
|
|
inf.is_strict = is_strict;
|
|
inf.idx = i;
|
|
upper.insert(e1, inf);
|
|
}
|
|
else {
|
|
mk_proof(new_pr, s, inf.idx, i);
|
|
s->update(i, m.mk_true(), new_pr);
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
else if (is_lower) {
|
|
inf.r = r;
|
|
inf.is_strict = is_strict;
|
|
inf.idx = i;
|
|
upper.insert(e1, inf);
|
|
}
|
|
else if (!is_lower && lower.find(e2, inf)) {
|
|
if (inf.r < r || (inf.r == r && is_strict && !inf.is_strict)) {
|
|
mk_proof(new_pr, s, i, inf.idx);
|
|
s->update(inf.idx, m.mk_true(), new_pr);
|
|
inf.r = r;
|
|
inf.is_strict = is_strict;
|
|
inf.idx = i;
|
|
lower.insert(e2, inf);
|
|
}
|
|
else {
|
|
mk_proof(new_pr, s, inf.idx, i);
|
|
s->update(i, m.mk_true());
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
else if (!is_lower) {
|
|
inf.r = r;
|
|
inf.is_strict = is_strict;
|
|
inf.idx = i;
|
|
lower.insert(e2, inf);
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
s->elim_true();
|
|
result.push_back(s.get());
|
|
TRACE("arith_subsumption", s->display(tout); );
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
|
tactic * mk_arith_bounds_tactic(ast_manager & m, params_ref const & p) {
|
|
return alloc(arith_bounds_tactic, m);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|