mirror of
https://github.com/Z3Prover/z3
synced 2025-11-18 20:00:49 +00:00
This also adds DOT printing support to interpolating proofs (color for different parts) iuc_proof is a proof used for IUC computation
235 lines
7.2 KiB
C++
235 lines
7.2 KiB
C++
|
|
|
|
#include "muz/spacer/spacer_iuc_proof.h"
|
|
#include "ast/for_each_expr.h"
|
|
#include "ast/array_decl_plugin.h"
|
|
#include "muz/spacer/spacer_proof_utils.h"
|
|
|
|
namespace spacer {
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* ====================================
|
|
* init
|
|
* ====================================
|
|
*/
|
|
iuc_proof::iuc_proof(ast_manager& m, proof* pr, expr_set& b_conjuncts) : m(m), m_pr(pr,m)
|
|
{
|
|
// init A-marks and B-marks
|
|
collect_symbols_b(b_conjuncts);
|
|
compute_marks(b_conjuncts);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
proof* iuc_proof::get()
|
|
{
|
|
return m_pr.get();
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* ====================================
|
|
* methods for computing symbol colors
|
|
* ====================================
|
|
*/
|
|
class collect_pure_proc {
|
|
func_decl_set& m_symbs;
|
|
public:
|
|
collect_pure_proc(func_decl_set& s):m_symbs(s) {}
|
|
|
|
void operator()(app* a) {
|
|
if (a->get_family_id() == null_family_id) {
|
|
m_symbs.insert(a->get_decl());
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
void operator()(var*) {}
|
|
void operator()(quantifier*) {}
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
void iuc_proof::collect_symbols_b(expr_set& b_conjuncts)
|
|
{
|
|
expr_mark visited;
|
|
collect_pure_proc proc(m_symbols_b);
|
|
for (expr_set::iterator it = b_conjuncts.begin(); it != b_conjuncts.end(); ++it)
|
|
{
|
|
for_each_expr(proc, visited, *it);
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
class is_pure_expr_proc {
|
|
func_decl_set const& m_symbs;
|
|
array_util m_au;
|
|
public:
|
|
struct non_pure {};
|
|
|
|
is_pure_expr_proc(func_decl_set const& s, ast_manager& m):
|
|
m_symbs(s),
|
|
m_au (m)
|
|
{}
|
|
|
|
void operator()(app* a) {
|
|
if (a->get_family_id() == null_family_id) {
|
|
if (!m_symbs.contains(a->get_decl())) {
|
|
throw non_pure();
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
else if (a->get_family_id () == m_au.get_family_id () &&
|
|
a->is_app_of (a->get_family_id (), OP_ARRAY_EXT)) {
|
|
throw non_pure();
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
void operator()(var*) {}
|
|
void operator()(quantifier*) {}
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
// requires that m_symbols_b has already been computed, which is done during initialization.
|
|
bool iuc_proof::only_contains_symbols_b(expr* expr) const
|
|
{
|
|
is_pure_expr_proc proc(m_symbols_b, m);
|
|
try {
|
|
for_each_expr(proc, expr);
|
|
}
|
|
catch (is_pure_expr_proc::non_pure)
|
|
{
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
return true;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* ====================================
|
|
* methods for computing which premises
|
|
* have been used to derive the conclusions
|
|
* ====================================
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
void iuc_proof::compute_marks(expr_set& b_conjuncts)
|
|
{
|
|
ProofIteratorPostOrder it(m_pr, m);
|
|
while (it.hasNext())
|
|
{
|
|
proof* currentNode = it.next();
|
|
|
|
if (m.get_num_parents(currentNode) == 0)
|
|
{
|
|
switch(currentNode->get_decl_kind())
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
case PR_ASSERTED: // currentNode is an axiom
|
|
{
|
|
if (b_conjuncts.contains(m.get_fact(currentNode)))
|
|
{
|
|
m_b_mark.mark(currentNode, true);
|
|
}
|
|
else
|
|
{
|
|
m_a_mark.mark(currentNode, true);
|
|
}
|
|
break;
|
|
}
|
|
// currentNode is a hypothesis:
|
|
case PR_HYPOTHESIS:
|
|
{
|
|
m_h_mark.mark(currentNode, true);
|
|
break;
|
|
}
|
|
default:
|
|
{
|
|
break;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
else
|
|
{
|
|
// collect from parents whether derivation of current node contains A-axioms, B-axioms and hypothesis
|
|
bool need_to_mark_a = false;
|
|
bool need_to_mark_b = false;
|
|
bool need_to_mark_h = false;
|
|
|
|
for (unsigned i = 0; i < m.get_num_parents(currentNode); ++i)
|
|
{
|
|
SASSERT(m.is_proof(currentNode->get_arg(i)));
|
|
proof* premise = to_app(currentNode->get_arg(i));
|
|
|
|
need_to_mark_a = need_to_mark_a || m_a_mark.is_marked(premise);
|
|
need_to_mark_b = need_to_mark_b || m_b_mark.is_marked(premise);
|
|
need_to_mark_h = need_to_mark_h || m_h_mark.is_marked(premise);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// if current node is application of lemma, we know that all hypothesis are removed
|
|
if(currentNode->get_decl_kind() == PR_LEMMA)
|
|
{
|
|
need_to_mark_h = false;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// save results
|
|
m_a_mark.mark(currentNode, need_to_mark_a);
|
|
m_b_mark.mark(currentNode, need_to_mark_b);
|
|
m_h_mark.mark(currentNode, need_to_mark_h);
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
bool iuc_proof::is_a_marked(proof* p)
|
|
{
|
|
return m_a_mark.is_marked(p);
|
|
}
|
|
bool iuc_proof::is_b_marked(proof* p)
|
|
{
|
|
return m_b_mark.is_marked(p);
|
|
}
|
|
bool iuc_proof::is_h_marked(proof* p)
|
|
{
|
|
return m_h_mark.is_marked(p);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* ====================================
|
|
* methods for dot printing
|
|
* ====================================
|
|
*/
|
|
void iuc_proof::pp_dot()
|
|
{
|
|
pp_proof_dot(m, m_pr, this);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* ====================================
|
|
* statistics
|
|
* ====================================
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
void iuc_proof::print_farkas_stats()
|
|
{
|
|
unsigned farkas_counter = 0;
|
|
unsigned farkas_counter2 = 0;
|
|
|
|
ProofIteratorPostOrder it3(m_pr, m);
|
|
while (it3.hasNext())
|
|
{
|
|
proof* currentNode = it3.next();
|
|
|
|
// if node is theory lemma
|
|
if (is_farkas_lemma(m, currentNode))
|
|
{
|
|
farkas_counter++;
|
|
|
|
// check whether farkas lemma is to be interpolated (could potentially miss farkas lemmas, which are interpolated, because we potentially don't want to use the lowest cut)
|
|
bool has_blue_nonred_parent = false;
|
|
for (unsigned i = 0; i < m.get_num_parents(currentNode); ++i)
|
|
{
|
|
proof* premise = to_app(currentNode->get_arg(i));
|
|
if (!is_a_marked(premise) && is_b_marked(premise))
|
|
{
|
|
has_blue_nonred_parent = true;
|
|
break;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
if (has_blue_nonred_parent && is_a_marked(currentNode))
|
|
{
|
|
SASSERT(is_b_marked(currentNode));
|
|
farkas_counter2++;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
verbose_stream() << "\nThis proof contains " << farkas_counter << " Farkas lemmas. " << farkas_counter2 << " Farkas lemmas participate in the lowest cut\n";
|
|
}
|
|
}
|