mirror of
https://github.com/Z3Prover/z3
synced 2025-08-23 19:47:52 +00:00
419 lines
12 KiB
C++
419 lines
12 KiB
C++
/*++
|
|
Copyright (c) 2021 Microsoft Corporation
|
|
|
|
Module Name:
|
|
|
|
polysat conflict
|
|
|
|
Author:
|
|
|
|
Nikolaj Bjorner (nbjorner) 2021-03-19
|
|
Jakob Rath 2021-04-6
|
|
|
|
Notes:
|
|
|
|
TODO: try a final core reduction step or other core minimization
|
|
|
|
TODO: revert(pvar v) is too weak.
|
|
It should apply saturation rules currently only available for propagated values.
|
|
|
|
TODO: dependency tracking for constraints evaluating to false should be minimized.
|
|
|
|
--*/
|
|
|
|
#include "math/polysat/conflict.h"
|
|
#include "math/polysat/solver.h"
|
|
#include "math/polysat/log.h"
|
|
#include "math/polysat/log_helper.h"
|
|
#include "math/polysat/explain.h"
|
|
#include "math/polysat/forbidden_intervals.h"
|
|
#include "math/polysat/saturation.h"
|
|
#include "math/polysat/variable_elimination.h"
|
|
#include <algorithm>
|
|
|
|
namespace polysat {
|
|
|
|
conflict::conflict(solver& s):s(s) {
|
|
ex_engines.push_back(alloc(ex_polynomial_superposition, s));
|
|
ve_engines.push_back(alloc(ve_reduction));
|
|
inf_engines.push_back(alloc(inf_saturate, s));
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
conflict::~conflict() {}
|
|
|
|
constraint_manager& conflict::cm() const { return s.m_constraints; }
|
|
|
|
std::ostream& conflict::display(std::ostream& out) const {
|
|
char const* sep = "";
|
|
for (auto c : *this)
|
|
out << sep << c->bvar2string() << " " << c, sep = " ; ";
|
|
if (!m_vars.empty())
|
|
out << " vars";
|
|
for (auto v : m_vars)
|
|
out << " v" << v;
|
|
return out;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
void conflict::reset() {
|
|
for (auto c : *this)
|
|
unset_mark(c);
|
|
m_constraints.reset();
|
|
m_literals.reset();
|
|
m_vars.reset();
|
|
m_conflict_var = null_var;
|
|
m_bailout = false;
|
|
SASSERT(empty());
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
* The constraint is false under the current assignment of variables.
|
|
* The core is then the conjuction of this constraint and assigned variables.
|
|
*/
|
|
void conflict::set(signed_constraint c) {
|
|
LOG("Conflict: " << c);
|
|
SASSERT(empty());
|
|
if (c.bvalue(s) == l_false) {
|
|
auto* cl = s.m_bvars.reason(c.blit().var());
|
|
if (cl)
|
|
set(*cl);
|
|
else
|
|
insert(c);
|
|
}
|
|
else {
|
|
SASSERT(c.is_currently_false(s));
|
|
// TBD: fails with test_subst SASSERT(c.bvalue(s) == l_true);
|
|
c->set_var_dependent();
|
|
insert(c);
|
|
}
|
|
SASSERT(!empty());
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
* The variable v cannot be assigned.
|
|
* The conflict is the set of justifications accumulated for the viable values for v.
|
|
* These constraints are (in the current form) not added to the core, but passed directly
|
|
* to the forbidden interval module.
|
|
* A consistent approach could be to add these constraints to the core and then also include the
|
|
* variable assignments.
|
|
*/
|
|
void conflict::set(pvar v) {
|
|
LOG("Conflict: v" << v);
|
|
SASSERT(empty());
|
|
m_conflict_var = v;
|
|
SASSERT(!empty());
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
* The clause is conflicting in the current search state.
|
|
*/
|
|
void conflict::set(clause const& cl) {
|
|
if (!empty())
|
|
return;
|
|
LOG("Conflict: " << cl);
|
|
SASSERT(empty());
|
|
for (auto lit : cl)
|
|
insert(~s.lit2cnstr(lit));
|
|
SASSERT(!empty());
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
* Insert constraint into conflict state
|
|
* Skip trivial constraints
|
|
* - e.g., constant ones such as "4 > 1"... only true ones
|
|
* should appear, otherwise the lemma would be a tautology
|
|
*/
|
|
void conflict::insert(signed_constraint c) {
|
|
if (c.is_always_true())
|
|
return;
|
|
if (c->is_marked())
|
|
return;
|
|
LOG("inserting: " << c);
|
|
SASSERT(!c->vars().empty());
|
|
set_mark(c);
|
|
if (c->has_bvar())
|
|
insert_literal(c.blit());
|
|
else
|
|
m_constraints.push_back(c);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
* Premises can either be justified by a Clause or by a value assignment.
|
|
* Premises that are justified by value assignments are not assigned (the bvalue is l_undef)
|
|
* The justification for those premises are based on the free assigned variables.
|
|
*
|
|
* NOTE: maybe we should skip intermediate steps and just collect the leaf premises for c?
|
|
* Ensure that c is assigned and justified
|
|
*/
|
|
void conflict::insert(signed_constraint c, vector<signed_constraint> const& premises) {
|
|
keep(c);
|
|
clause_builder c_lemma(s);
|
|
for (auto premise : premises) {
|
|
LOG_H3("premise: " << premise);
|
|
keep(premise);
|
|
SASSERT(premise->has_bvar());
|
|
SASSERT(premise.bvalue(s) != l_false);
|
|
c_lemma.push(~premise.blit());
|
|
}
|
|
c_lemma.push(c.blit());
|
|
clause_ref lemma = c_lemma.build();
|
|
cm().store(lemma.get(), s);
|
|
if (s.m_bvars.value(c.blit()) == l_undef)
|
|
s.assign_propagate(c.blit(), *lemma);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
void conflict::remove(signed_constraint c) {
|
|
SASSERT(!c->has_bvar() || std::count(m_constraints.begin(), m_constraints.end(), c) == 0);
|
|
unset_mark(c);
|
|
if (c->has_bvar())
|
|
remove_literal(c.blit());
|
|
else
|
|
m_constraints.erase(c);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
void conflict::replace(signed_constraint c_old, signed_constraint c_new, vector<signed_constraint> const& c_new_premises) {
|
|
remove(c_old);
|
|
insert(c_new, c_new_premises);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
bool conflict::contains(signed_constraint c) {
|
|
if (c->has_bvar())
|
|
return m_literals.contains(c.blit().index());
|
|
else
|
|
return m_constraints.contains(c);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
void conflict::set_bailout() {
|
|
SASSERT(!is_bailout());
|
|
m_bailout = true;
|
|
s.m_stats.m_num_bailouts++;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
void conflict::resolve(constraint_manager const& m, sat::literal lit, clause const& cl) {
|
|
// Note: core: x, y, z; corresponds to clause ~x \/ ~y \/ ~z
|
|
// clause: x \/ u \/ v
|
|
// resolvent: ~y \/ ~z \/ u \/ v; as core: y, z, ~u, ~v
|
|
|
|
SASSERT(lit != sat::null_literal);
|
|
SASSERT(~lit != sat::null_literal);
|
|
SASSERT(std::all_of(m_constraints.begin(), m_constraints.end(), [](signed_constraint const& c){ return !c->has_bvar(); }));
|
|
SASSERT(contains_literal(lit));
|
|
SASSERT(std::count(cl.begin(), cl.end(), lit) > 0);
|
|
SASSERT(!contains_literal(~lit));
|
|
SASSERT(std::count(cl.begin(), cl.end(), ~lit) == 0);
|
|
|
|
remove_literal(lit);
|
|
unset_mark(m.lookup(lit));
|
|
for (sat::literal lit2 : cl)
|
|
if (lit2 != lit)
|
|
insert(m.lookup(~lit2));
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
* If the constraint c is a temporary constraint derived by core saturation,
|
|
* insert it (and recursively, its premises) into \Gamma
|
|
*/
|
|
void conflict::keep(signed_constraint c) {
|
|
if (c->has_bvar())
|
|
return;
|
|
LOG_H3("keeping: " << c);
|
|
remove(c);
|
|
cm().ensure_bvar(c.get());
|
|
insert(c);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
clause_builder conflict::build_lemma() {
|
|
// SASSERT(std::all_of(m_vars.begin(), m_vars.end(), [&](pvar v) { return s.is_assigned(v); }));
|
|
SASSERT(std::all_of(m_constraints.begin(), m_constraints.end(), [](signed_constraint const& c) { return !c->has_bvar(); }));
|
|
|
|
LOG_H3("Build lemma from core");
|
|
LOG("core: " << *this);
|
|
clause_builder lemma(s);
|
|
|
|
while (!m_constraints.empty())
|
|
keep(m_constraints.back());
|
|
|
|
for (auto c : *this)
|
|
minimize_vars(c);
|
|
|
|
for (auto c : *this)
|
|
lemma.push(~c);
|
|
|
|
for (unsigned v : m_vars) {
|
|
if (!is_pmarked(v))
|
|
continue;
|
|
s.inc_activity(v);
|
|
auto eq = s.eq(s.var(v), s.get_value(v));
|
|
cm().ensure_bvar(eq.get());
|
|
if (eq.bvalue(s) == l_undef)
|
|
s.assign_eval(s.get_level(v), eq.blit());
|
|
lemma.push(~eq);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return lemma;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
void conflict::minimize_vars(signed_constraint c) {
|
|
if (m_vars.empty())
|
|
return;
|
|
if (!c.is_currently_false(s))
|
|
return;
|
|
assignment_t a;
|
|
for (auto v : m_vars)
|
|
a.push_back(std::make_pair(v, s.get_value(v)));
|
|
for (unsigned i = 0; i < a.size(); ++i) {
|
|
std::pair<pvar, rational> save = a[i];
|
|
std::pair<pvar, rational> last = a.back();
|
|
a[i] = last;
|
|
a.pop_back();
|
|
if (c.is_currently_false(a))
|
|
--i;
|
|
else {
|
|
a.push_back(last);
|
|
a[i] = save;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
if (a.size() == m_vars.num_elems())
|
|
return;
|
|
m_vars.reset();
|
|
for (auto const& [v, val] : a)
|
|
m_vars.insert(v);
|
|
LOG("reduced " << m_vars);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
bool conflict::resolve_value(pvar v) {
|
|
// NOTE:
|
|
// In the "standard" case where "v = val" is on the stack:
|
|
// - core contains both false and true constraints
|
|
// (originally only false ones, but additional true ones may come from saturation)
|
|
|
|
// forbidden interval projection is performed at top level
|
|
SASSERT(v != conflict_var());
|
|
|
|
if (is_bailout()) {
|
|
if (!s.m_justification[v].is_decision())
|
|
m_vars.remove(v);
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
auto const& j = s.m_justification[v];
|
|
|
|
s.inc_activity(v);
|
|
|
|
m_vars.remove(v);
|
|
|
|
if (j.is_propagation())
|
|
for (auto const& c : s.m_viable.get_constraints(v))
|
|
insert(c);
|
|
|
|
for (auto* engine : ex_engines)
|
|
if (engine->try_explain(v, *this))
|
|
return true;
|
|
|
|
// No value resolution method was successful => fall back to saturation and variable elimination
|
|
while (s.inc()) {
|
|
// TODO: as a last resort, substitute v by m_value[v]?
|
|
if (try_eliminate(v))
|
|
return true;
|
|
if (!try_saturate(v))
|
|
break;
|
|
}
|
|
set_bailout();
|
|
if (s.is_assigned(v) && j.is_decision())
|
|
m_vars.insert(v);
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
bool conflict::try_eliminate(pvar v) {
|
|
bool has_v = false;
|
|
for (auto c : *this)
|
|
has_v |= c->is_var_dependent() && c->contains_var(v);
|
|
if (!has_v)
|
|
return true;
|
|
for (auto* engine : ve_engines)
|
|
if (engine->perform(s, v, *this))
|
|
return true;
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
bool conflict::try_saturate(pvar v) {
|
|
for (auto* engine : inf_engines)
|
|
if (engine->perform(v, *this))
|
|
return true;
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
void conflict::set_mark(signed_constraint c) {
|
|
if (c->is_marked())
|
|
return;
|
|
c->set_mark();
|
|
if (c->has_bvar())
|
|
set_bmark(c->bvar());
|
|
if (c->is_var_dependent()) {
|
|
for (auto v : c->vars()) {
|
|
if (s.is_assigned(v))
|
|
m_vars.insert(v);
|
|
inc_pref(v);
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
void conflict::unset_mark(signed_constraint c) {
|
|
if (!c->is_marked())
|
|
return;
|
|
c->unset_mark();
|
|
if (c->has_bvar())
|
|
unset_bmark(c->bvar());
|
|
if (c->is_var_dependent()) {
|
|
c->unset_var_dependent();
|
|
for (auto v : c->vars())
|
|
dec_pref(v);
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
void conflict::inc_pref(pvar v) {
|
|
if (v >= m_pvar2count.size())
|
|
m_pvar2count.resize(v + 1);
|
|
m_pvar2count[v]++;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
void conflict::dec_pref(pvar v) {
|
|
SASSERT(m_pvar2count[v] > 0);
|
|
m_pvar2count[v]--;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
bool conflict::is_pmarked(pvar v) const {
|
|
return m_pvar2count.get(v, 0) > 0;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
void conflict::set_bmark(sat::bool_var b) {
|
|
if (b >= m_bvar2mark.size())
|
|
m_bvar2mark.resize(b + 1);
|
|
SASSERT(!m_bvar2mark[b]);
|
|
m_bvar2mark[b] = true;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
void conflict::unset_bmark(sat::bool_var b) {
|
|
SASSERT(m_bvar2mark[b]);
|
|
m_bvar2mark[b] = false;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
bool conflict::is_bmarked(sat::bool_var b) const {
|
|
return m_bvar2mark.get(b, false);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
bool conflict::contains_literal(sat::literal lit) const {
|
|
return m_literals.contains(lit.to_uint());
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
void conflict::insert_literal(sat::literal lit) {
|
|
m_literals.insert(lit.to_uint());
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
void conflict::remove_literal(sat::literal lit) {
|
|
m_literals.remove(lit.to_uint());
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|