mirror of
https://github.com/Z3Prover/z3
synced 2025-04-22 08:35:31 +00:00
resurrect Booelan decisions to deal with quot-rem and similar axioms
Signed-off-by: Nikolaj Bjorner <nbjorner@microsoft.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
be790b8892
commit
ff4b471f93
4 changed files with 30 additions and 21 deletions
|
@ -40,7 +40,6 @@ namespace polysat {
|
|||
SASSERT_EQ(m_clause[var], nullptr);
|
||||
SASSERT_EQ(m_deps[var], null_dependency);
|
||||
}
|
||||
m_free_vars.mk_var_eh(var);
|
||||
return var;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -72,6 +71,12 @@ namespace polysat {
|
|||
SASSERT(is_decision(lit));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
void bool_var_manager::decide(sat::literal lit, unsigned lvl) {
|
||||
LOG("Decide literal " << lit << " @ " << lvl);
|
||||
assign(kind_t::decision, lit, lvl, nullptr);
|
||||
SASSERT(is_decision(lit));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
void bool_var_manager::eval(sat::literal lit, unsigned lvl) {
|
||||
LOG("Eval literal " << lit << " @ " << lvl);
|
||||
assign(kind_t::propagation, lit, lvl, nullptr);
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -74,6 +74,7 @@ namespace polysat {
|
|||
unsigned_vector& activity() { return m_activity; }
|
||||
bool can_decide() const { return !m_free_vars.empty(); }
|
||||
sat::bool_var next_var() { return m_free_vars.next_var(); }
|
||||
void track_var(sat::literal lit) { m_free_vars.mk_var_eh(lit.var()); }
|
||||
|
||||
// TODO connect activity updates with solver
|
||||
void inc_activity(sat::literal lit) { m_activity[lit.var()]++; }
|
||||
|
@ -82,6 +83,8 @@ namespace polysat {
|
|||
/// Set the given literal to true
|
||||
void propagate(sat::literal lit, unsigned lvl, clause& reason);
|
||||
void decide(sat::literal lit, unsigned lvl, clause& lemma);
|
||||
void decide(sat::literal lit, unsigned lvl);
|
||||
|
||||
void eval(sat::literal lit, unsigned lvl);
|
||||
void asserted(sat::literal lit, unsigned lvl, dependency dep);
|
||||
void unassign(sat::literal lit);
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -150,20 +150,13 @@ namespace polysat {
|
|||
add_eq(b * q + r - a);
|
||||
add_noovfl(b, q);
|
||||
add_ule(r, b*q+r);
|
||||
auto c1 = eq(b);
|
||||
auto c2 = ult(r, b);
|
||||
auto c3 = diseq(b);
|
||||
auto c4 = eq(q + 1);
|
||||
add_clause(c1, c2, false);
|
||||
add_clause(c3, c4, false);
|
||||
|
||||
// BUG:
|
||||
// need to watch these constraints.
|
||||
// ... but activation discipline seems to
|
||||
// work only for lemmas. Literals are watched only when assigned true.
|
||||
// The literals are de-activated
|
||||
// after propagation
|
||||
// Should these clauses then be added as lemmas that force a branch?
|
||||
auto c_eq = eq(b);
|
||||
add_clause(c_eq, ult(r, b), false);
|
||||
add_clause(~c_eq, eq(q + 1), false);
|
||||
|
||||
// force decisions on whether b == 0
|
||||
m_bvars.track_var(c_eq.blit());
|
||||
|
||||
return std::tuple<pdd, pdd>(q, r);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -449,7 +442,10 @@ namespace polysat {
|
|||
void solver::decide() {
|
||||
LOG_H2("Decide");
|
||||
SASSERT(can_decide());
|
||||
pdecide(m_free_pvars.next_var());
|
||||
if (!m_free_pvars.empty())
|
||||
pdecide(m_free_pvars.next_var());
|
||||
else
|
||||
bdecide(m_bvars.next_var());
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
void solver::pdecide(pvar v) {
|
||||
|
@ -472,9 +468,16 @@ namespace polysat {
|
|||
push_level();
|
||||
assign_core(v, val, justification::decision(m_level));
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
void solver::bdecide(sat::bool_var b) {
|
||||
sat::literal lit(b);
|
||||
m_bvars.decide(lit, m_level);
|
||||
m_trail.push_back(trail_instr_t::assign_bool_i);
|
||||
m_search.push_boolean(lit);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
void solver::assign_core(pvar v, rational const& val, justification const& j) {
|
||||
if (j.is_decision())
|
||||
++m_stats.m_num_decisions;
|
||||
|
@ -766,16 +769,14 @@ namespace polysat {
|
|||
// The lemma where 'lit' comes from.
|
||||
// Currently, boolean decisions always come from guessing a literal of a learned non-unit lemma.
|
||||
clause* lemma = m_bvars.lemma(var); // need to grab this while 'lit' is still assigned
|
||||
// We only revert decisions that come from lemmas, so lemma must not be NULL here.
|
||||
// (Externally asserted literals are at a base level, so we would return UNSAT instead of reverting.)
|
||||
SASSERT(lemma);
|
||||
|
||||
backjump(m_bvars.level(var) - 1);
|
||||
|
||||
// reason should force ~lit after propagation
|
||||
add_clause(*reason);
|
||||
|
||||
enqueue_decision_on_lemma(*lemma);
|
||||
if (lemma)
|
||||
enqueue_decision_on_lemma(*lemma);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
unsigned solver::level(sat::literal lit0, clause const& cl) {
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -185,7 +185,7 @@ namespace polysat {
|
|||
void set_conflict(clause& cl) { m_conflict.set(cl); }
|
||||
void set_conflict(pvar v) { m_conflict.set(v); }
|
||||
|
||||
bool can_decide() const { return !m_free_pvars.empty(); }
|
||||
bool can_decide() const { return !m_free_pvars.empty() || m_bvars.can_decide(); }
|
||||
void decide();
|
||||
void pdecide(pvar v);
|
||||
void bdecide(sat::bool_var b);
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue