mirror of
https://github.com/Z3Prover/z3
synced 2025-04-15 21:38:44 +00:00
integrating changes of Nikolaj with m_empty_clause etc.
Signed-off-by: Lev Nachmanson <levnach@hotmail.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
15dff85b22
commit
f939a26c86
|
@ -72,7 +72,7 @@ bool horner::lemmas_on_expr(cross_nested& cn, nex_sum* e) {
|
|||
template <typename T>
|
||||
bool horner::lemmas_on_row(const T& row) {
|
||||
cross_nested cn(
|
||||
[this](const nex* n) { return m_intervals->check_cross_nested_expr(n, m_fixed_as_scalars? get_fixed_vars_dep_from_row(c().m_lar_solver.A_r().m_rows[m_row_index], m_intervals->dep_manager()) : nullptr); },
|
||||
[this](const nex* n) { return m_intervals->check_nex(n, m_fixed_as_scalars? get_fixed_vars_dep_from_row(c().m_lar_solver.A_r().m_rows[m_row_index], m_intervals->dep_manager()) : nullptr); },
|
||||
[this](unsigned j) { return c().var_is_fixed(j); },
|
||||
[this]() { return c().random(); }, m_nex_creator);
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -453,7 +453,7 @@ void nla_grobner::process_simplified_target(equation* target, ptr_buffer<equatio
|
|||
}
|
||||
|
||||
void nla_grobner::check_eq(equation* target) {
|
||||
if(m_intervals->check_cross_nested_expr(target->expr(), target->dep())) {
|
||||
if(m_intervals->check_nex(target->expr(), target->dep())) {
|
||||
TRACE("grobner", tout << "created a lemma for "; display_equation(tout, *target) << "\n";
|
||||
tout << "vars = \n";
|
||||
for (lpvar j : get_vars_of_expr(target->expr())) {
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -244,19 +244,19 @@ intervals::interv intervals::interval_of_mul(const nex_mul* e) {
|
|||
return a;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
bool intervals::check_cross_nested_expr(const nex* n, ci_dependency* initial_deps) {
|
||||
TRACE("nla_intervals", tout << "cross-nested n = " << *n << ", n->type() == " << n->type() << "\n";);
|
||||
// return true iff the interval of n is does not contain 0
|
||||
bool intervals::check_nex(const nex* n, ci_dependency* initial_deps) {
|
||||
TRACE("nla_grobner", tout << "cross-nested n = " << *n << ", n->type() == " << n->type() << "\n";);
|
||||
m_core->lp_settings().stats().m_cross_nested_forms++;
|
||||
|
||||
auto i = interval_of_expr(n, 1);
|
||||
TRACE("nla_intervals", tout << "callback n = " << *n << "\ni="; display(tout, i) << "\n";);
|
||||
TRACE("nla_grobner", tout << "callback n = " << *n << "\ni="; display(tout, i) << "\n";);
|
||||
if (!separated_from_zero(i)) {
|
||||
reset();
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
auto interv_wd = interval_of_expr_with_deps(n, 1);
|
||||
TRACE("nla_intervals", tout << "conflict: interv_wd = "; display(tout, interv_wd ) << *n << "\n";);
|
||||
TRACE("nla_grobner", tout << "conflict: interv_wd = "; display(tout, interv_wd ) << *n << "\n";);
|
||||
check_interval_for_conflict_on_zero(interv_wd, initial_deps);
|
||||
reset(); // clean the memory allocated by the interval bound dependencies
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -452,7 +452,7 @@ public:
|
|||
return false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
void reset() { m_alloc.reset(); }
|
||||
bool check_cross_nested_expr(const nex*, ci_dependency*);
|
||||
bool check_nex(const nex*, ci_dependency*);
|
||||
interval interval_of_expr_with_deps(const nex* e, unsigned power);
|
||||
interval interval_of_expr(const nex* e, unsigned power);
|
||||
interval interval_of_sum(const nex_sum*);
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -75,6 +75,7 @@ namespace smt {
|
|||
m_phase_default(false),
|
||||
m_conflict(null_b_justification),
|
||||
m_not_l(null_literal),
|
||||
m_empty_clause(false),
|
||||
m_conflict_resolution(mk_conflict_resolution(m, *this, m_dyn_ack_manager, p, m_assigned_literals, m_watches)),
|
||||
m_unsat_proof(m),
|
||||
m_dyn_ack_manager(*this, p),
|
||||
|
@ -2396,9 +2397,10 @@ namespace smt {
|
|||
m_unsat_proof = nullptr;
|
||||
}
|
||||
m_base_scopes.shrink(new_lvl);
|
||||
m_empty_clause = false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
else {
|
||||
m_conflict = null_b_justification;
|
||||
m_conflict = m_empty_clause ? b_justification::mk_axiom() : null_b_justification;
|
||||
m_not_l = null_literal;
|
||||
}
|
||||
del_clauses(m_aux_clauses, s.m_aux_clauses_lim);
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -193,6 +193,7 @@ namespace smt {
|
|||
// levels survives to the base level.
|
||||
b_justification m_conflict;
|
||||
literal m_not_l;
|
||||
bool m_empty_clause;
|
||||
scoped_ptr<conflict_resolution> m_conflict_resolution;
|
||||
proof_ref m_unsat_proof;
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -165,6 +165,7 @@ class theory_lra::imp {
|
|||
ast_manager& m;
|
||||
theory_arith_params& m_arith_params;
|
||||
arith_util a;
|
||||
unsigned m_final_check_idx;
|
||||
arith_eq_adapter m_arith_eq_adapter;
|
||||
vector<rational> m_columns;
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -942,7 +943,8 @@ public:
|
|||
imp(theory_lra& th, ast_manager& m, theory_arith_params& ap):
|
||||
th(th), m(m),
|
||||
m_arith_params(ap),
|
||||
a(m),
|
||||
a(m),
|
||||
m_final_check_idx(0),
|
||||
m_arith_eq_adapter(th, ap, a),
|
||||
m_internalize_head(0),
|
||||
m_one_var(UINT_MAX),
|
||||
|
@ -997,7 +999,7 @@ public:
|
|||
return true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
else {
|
||||
TRACE("arith", tout << "Could not internalize " << mk_pp(atom, m) << "\n";);
|
||||
TRACE("arith", tout << "Could not internalize " << mk_pp(atom, m) << "\n";);
|
||||
found_not_handled(atom);
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -1651,13 +1653,16 @@ public:
|
|||
if (lp().get_status() != lp::lp_status::OPTIMAL) {
|
||||
is_sat = make_feasible();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
final_check_status st = FC_DONE;
|
||||
unsigned old_idx = m_final_check_idx;
|
||||
switch (is_sat) {
|
||||
case l_true:
|
||||
|
||||
if (delayed_assume_eqs()) {
|
||||
return FC_CONTINUE;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
TRACE("arith", display(tout););
|
||||
switch (check_lia()) {
|
||||
|
@ -1681,18 +1686,17 @@ public:
|
|||
st = FC_GIVEUP;
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (assume_eqs()) {
|
||||
return FC_CONTINUE;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (m_not_handled != nullptr) {
|
||||
TRACE("arith", tout << "unhandled operator " << mk_pp(m_not_handled, m) << "\n";);
|
||||
st = FC_GIVEUP;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (assume_eqs()) {
|
||||
return FC_CONTINUE;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
return st;
|
||||
case l_false:
|
||||
get_infeasibility_explanation_and_set_conflict();
|
||||
set_conflict();
|
||||
return FC_CONTINUE;
|
||||
case l_undef:
|
||||
TRACE("arith", tout << "check feasiable is undef\n";);
|
||||
|
@ -1701,6 +1705,7 @@ public:
|
|||
UNREACHABLE();
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
TRACE("arith", tout << "default giveup\n";);
|
||||
return FC_GIVEUP;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -2172,7 +2177,7 @@ public:
|
|||
for(const nla::lemma & l : lv) {
|
||||
m_lemma = l; //todo avoid the copy
|
||||
m_explanation = l.expl();
|
||||
m_stats.m_nla_explanations += l.expl().size();
|
||||
m_stats.m_nla_explanations += static_cast<unsigned>(l.expl().size());
|
||||
false_case_of_check_nla();
|
||||
}
|
||||
break;
|
||||
|
@ -2771,10 +2776,14 @@ public:
|
|||
bool sign = ub->get_bound_kind() != lp_api::upper_t;
|
||||
lit2 = literal(ub->get_bv(), sign);
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (ctx().get_assignment(lit2) == l_true) {
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
TRACE("arith",
|
||||
ctx().display_literal_verbose(tout, lit1);
|
||||
ctx().display_literal_verbose(tout << " => ", lit2);
|
||||
tout << "\n";);
|
||||
ctx().display_literal_verbose(tout << " => ", lit2) << "\n";
|
||||
tout << ctx().get_assignment(lit2) << " " << ctx().get_assignment(lit1) << "\n";
|
||||
);
|
||||
updt_unassigned_bounds(v, -1);
|
||||
++m_stats.m_bound_propagations2;
|
||||
m_params.reset();
|
||||
|
@ -2974,15 +2983,15 @@ public:
|
|||
auto vi = register_theory_var_in_lar_solver(b.get_var());
|
||||
rational bound = b.get_value();
|
||||
lp::constraint_index ci;
|
||||
TRACE("arith", tout << "v" << b.get_var() << ", vi = " << vi;);
|
||||
TRACE("arith", tout << "v" << b.get_var() << ", vi = " << vi << "\n";);
|
||||
if (is_int && !is_true) {
|
||||
rational bound = b.get_value(false).get_rational();
|
||||
ci = m_solver->add_var_bound(vi, k, bound);
|
||||
TRACE("arith", tout << "\bbound = " << bound << ", ci = " << ci << "\n";);
|
||||
TRACE("arith", tout << "bound = " << bound << ", ci = " << ci << "\n";);
|
||||
}
|
||||
else {
|
||||
ci = m_solver->add_var_bound(vi, k, b.get_value());
|
||||
TRACE("arith", tout << "\nbound = " << bound << ", ci = " << ci << "\n";);
|
||||
TRACE("arith", tout << "bound = " << bound << ", ci = " << ci << "\n";);
|
||||
}
|
||||
add_ineq_constraint(ci, literal(bv, !is_true));
|
||||
if (is_infeasible()) {
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue