3
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/Z3Prover/z3 synced 2025-04-15 21:38:44 +00:00

integrating changes of Nikolaj with m_empty_clause etc.

Signed-off-by: Lev Nachmanson <levnach@hotmail.com>
This commit is contained in:
Lev Nachmanson 2019-12-09 10:43:03 -10:00
parent 15dff85b22
commit f939a26c86
7 changed files with 34 additions and 22 deletions

View file

@ -72,7 +72,7 @@ bool horner::lemmas_on_expr(cross_nested& cn, nex_sum* e) {
template <typename T>
bool horner::lemmas_on_row(const T& row) {
cross_nested cn(
[this](const nex* n) { return m_intervals->check_cross_nested_expr(n, m_fixed_as_scalars? get_fixed_vars_dep_from_row(c().m_lar_solver.A_r().m_rows[m_row_index], m_intervals->dep_manager()) : nullptr); },
[this](const nex* n) { return m_intervals->check_nex(n, m_fixed_as_scalars? get_fixed_vars_dep_from_row(c().m_lar_solver.A_r().m_rows[m_row_index], m_intervals->dep_manager()) : nullptr); },
[this](unsigned j) { return c().var_is_fixed(j); },
[this]() { return c().random(); }, m_nex_creator);

View file

@ -453,7 +453,7 @@ void nla_grobner::process_simplified_target(equation* target, ptr_buffer<equatio
}
void nla_grobner::check_eq(equation* target) {
if(m_intervals->check_cross_nested_expr(target->expr(), target->dep())) {
if(m_intervals->check_nex(target->expr(), target->dep())) {
TRACE("grobner", tout << "created a lemma for "; display_equation(tout, *target) << "\n";
tout << "vars = \n";
for (lpvar j : get_vars_of_expr(target->expr())) {

View file

@ -244,19 +244,19 @@ intervals::interv intervals::interval_of_mul(const nex_mul* e) {
return a;
}
bool intervals::check_cross_nested_expr(const nex* n, ci_dependency* initial_deps) {
TRACE("nla_intervals", tout << "cross-nested n = " << *n << ", n->type() == " << n->type() << "\n";);
// return true iff the interval of n is does not contain 0
bool intervals::check_nex(const nex* n, ci_dependency* initial_deps) {
TRACE("nla_grobner", tout << "cross-nested n = " << *n << ", n->type() == " << n->type() << "\n";);
m_core->lp_settings().stats().m_cross_nested_forms++;
auto i = interval_of_expr(n, 1);
TRACE("nla_intervals", tout << "callback n = " << *n << "\ni="; display(tout, i) << "\n";);
TRACE("nla_grobner", tout << "callback n = " << *n << "\ni="; display(tout, i) << "\n";);
if (!separated_from_zero(i)) {
reset();
return false;
}
auto interv_wd = interval_of_expr_with_deps(n, 1);
TRACE("nla_intervals", tout << "conflict: interv_wd = "; display(tout, interv_wd ) << *n << "\n";);
TRACE("nla_grobner", tout << "conflict: interv_wd = "; display(tout, interv_wd ) << *n << "\n";);
check_interval_for_conflict_on_zero(interv_wd, initial_deps);
reset(); // clean the memory allocated by the interval bound dependencies
return true;

View file

@ -452,7 +452,7 @@ public:
return false;
}
void reset() { m_alloc.reset(); }
bool check_cross_nested_expr(const nex*, ci_dependency*);
bool check_nex(const nex*, ci_dependency*);
interval interval_of_expr_with_deps(const nex* e, unsigned power);
interval interval_of_expr(const nex* e, unsigned power);
interval interval_of_sum(const nex_sum*);

View file

@ -75,6 +75,7 @@ namespace smt {
m_phase_default(false),
m_conflict(null_b_justification),
m_not_l(null_literal),
m_empty_clause(false),
m_conflict_resolution(mk_conflict_resolution(m, *this, m_dyn_ack_manager, p, m_assigned_literals, m_watches)),
m_unsat_proof(m),
m_dyn_ack_manager(*this, p),
@ -2396,9 +2397,10 @@ namespace smt {
m_unsat_proof = nullptr;
}
m_base_scopes.shrink(new_lvl);
m_empty_clause = false;
}
else {
m_conflict = null_b_justification;
m_conflict = m_empty_clause ? b_justification::mk_axiom() : null_b_justification;
m_not_l = null_literal;
}
del_clauses(m_aux_clauses, s.m_aux_clauses_lim);

View file

@ -193,6 +193,7 @@ namespace smt {
// levels survives to the base level.
b_justification m_conflict;
literal m_not_l;
bool m_empty_clause;
scoped_ptr<conflict_resolution> m_conflict_resolution;
proof_ref m_unsat_proof;

View file

@ -165,6 +165,7 @@ class theory_lra::imp {
ast_manager& m;
theory_arith_params& m_arith_params;
arith_util a;
unsigned m_final_check_idx;
arith_eq_adapter m_arith_eq_adapter;
vector<rational> m_columns;
@ -942,7 +943,8 @@ public:
imp(theory_lra& th, ast_manager& m, theory_arith_params& ap):
th(th), m(m),
m_arith_params(ap),
a(m),
a(m),
m_final_check_idx(0),
m_arith_eq_adapter(th, ap, a),
m_internalize_head(0),
m_one_var(UINT_MAX),
@ -997,7 +999,7 @@ public:
return true;
}
else {
TRACE("arith", tout << "Could not internalize " << mk_pp(atom, m) << "\n";);
TRACE("arith", tout << "Could not internalize " << mk_pp(atom, m) << "\n";);
found_not_handled(atom);
return true;
}
@ -1651,13 +1653,16 @@ public:
if (lp().get_status() != lp::lp_status::OPTIMAL) {
is_sat = make_feasible();
}
final_check_status st = FC_DONE;
unsigned old_idx = m_final_check_idx;
switch (is_sat) {
case l_true:
if (delayed_assume_eqs()) {
return FC_CONTINUE;
}
TRACE("arith", display(tout););
switch (check_lia()) {
@ -1681,18 +1686,17 @@ public:
st = FC_GIVEUP;
break;
}
if (assume_eqs()) {
return FC_CONTINUE;
}
if (m_not_handled != nullptr) {
TRACE("arith", tout << "unhandled operator " << mk_pp(m_not_handled, m) << "\n";);
st = FC_GIVEUP;
}
if (assume_eqs()) {
return FC_CONTINUE;
}
return st;
case l_false:
get_infeasibility_explanation_and_set_conflict();
set_conflict();
return FC_CONTINUE;
case l_undef:
TRACE("arith", tout << "check feasiable is undef\n";);
@ -1701,6 +1705,7 @@ public:
UNREACHABLE();
break;
}
TRACE("arith", tout << "default giveup\n";);
return FC_GIVEUP;
}
@ -2172,7 +2177,7 @@ public:
for(const nla::lemma & l : lv) {
m_lemma = l; //todo avoid the copy
m_explanation = l.expl();
m_stats.m_nla_explanations += l.expl().size();
m_stats.m_nla_explanations += static_cast<unsigned>(l.expl().size());
false_case_of_check_nla();
}
break;
@ -2771,10 +2776,14 @@ public:
bool sign = ub->get_bound_kind() != lp_api::upper_t;
lit2 = literal(ub->get_bv(), sign);
}
if (ctx().get_assignment(lit2) == l_true) {
return;
}
TRACE("arith",
ctx().display_literal_verbose(tout, lit1);
ctx().display_literal_verbose(tout << " => ", lit2);
tout << "\n";);
ctx().display_literal_verbose(tout << " => ", lit2) << "\n";
tout << ctx().get_assignment(lit2) << " " << ctx().get_assignment(lit1) << "\n";
);
updt_unassigned_bounds(v, -1);
++m_stats.m_bound_propagations2;
m_params.reset();
@ -2974,15 +2983,15 @@ public:
auto vi = register_theory_var_in_lar_solver(b.get_var());
rational bound = b.get_value();
lp::constraint_index ci;
TRACE("arith", tout << "v" << b.get_var() << ", vi = " << vi;);
TRACE("arith", tout << "v" << b.get_var() << ", vi = " << vi << "\n";);
if (is_int && !is_true) {
rational bound = b.get_value(false).get_rational();
ci = m_solver->add_var_bound(vi, k, bound);
TRACE("arith", tout << "\bbound = " << bound << ", ci = " << ci << "\n";);
TRACE("arith", tout << "bound = " << bound << ", ci = " << ci << "\n";);
}
else {
ci = m_solver->add_var_bound(vi, k, b.get_value());
TRACE("arith", tout << "\nbound = " << bound << ", ci = " << ci << "\n";);
TRACE("arith", tout << "bound = " << bound << ", ci = " << ci << "\n";);
}
add_ineq_constraint(ci, literal(bv, !is_true));
if (is_infeasible()) {