mirror of
https://github.com/Z3Prover/z3
synced 2025-04-23 17:15:31 +00:00
basic slicing conflict clause
This commit is contained in:
parent
045b5ed683
commit
f1b2a504d1
1 changed files with 63 additions and 31 deletions
|
@ -680,6 +680,8 @@ namespace polysat {
|
|||
|
||||
clause_ref slicing::build_conflict_clause() {
|
||||
LOG_H1("slicing: build_conflict_clause");
|
||||
// display_tree(verbose_stream());
|
||||
|
||||
SASSERT(invariant());
|
||||
SASSERT(is_conflict());
|
||||
SASSERT(m_marked_lits.empty());
|
||||
|
@ -692,10 +694,16 @@ namespace polysat {
|
|||
cb.insert(~lit);
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
auto add_conclusion = [this, &cb](signed_constraint c) {
|
||||
LOG("Conclusion: " << lit_pp(m_solver, c));
|
||||
cb.insert_eval(c);
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
pvar x = null_var; enode* sx = nullptr; sat::literal xlit = sat::null_literal;
|
||||
pvar y = null_var; enode* sy = nullptr; sat::literal ylit = sat::null_literal;
|
||||
for (void* dp : m_tmp_deps) {
|
||||
dep_t const d = dep_t::decode(dp);
|
||||
// LOG("dep: " << dep_pp(*this, d));
|
||||
if (d.is_null())
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
if (d.is_lit()) {
|
||||
|
@ -735,55 +743,79 @@ namespace polysat {
|
|||
if (y != null_var) LOG("Variable v" << y << " with slice " << slice_pp(*this, sy) << " by literal " << lit_pp(m_solver, ylit));
|
||||
|
||||
// conflict has either 0 or 2 vars
|
||||
SASSERT(x != null_var || y == null_var);
|
||||
SASSERT(y != null_var || x == null_var);
|
||||
VERIFY(x != null_var || y == null_var);
|
||||
VERIFY(y != null_var || x == null_var);
|
||||
|
||||
signed_constraint c;
|
||||
if (xlit != sat::null_literal && ylit != sat::null_literal) {
|
||||
std::cout << "build_conflict_clause (2)" << std::endl;
|
||||
verbose_stream() << "build_conflict_clause (2)" << std::endl;
|
||||
add_premise(xlit);
|
||||
add_premise(ylit);
|
||||
}
|
||||
else if (xlit != sat::null_literal && ylit == sat::null_literal) {
|
||||
std::cout << "build_conflict_clause (1)" << std::endl;
|
||||
verbose_stream() << "build_conflict_clause (1)" << std::endl;
|
||||
add_premise(xlit);
|
||||
unsigned hi, lo;
|
||||
VERIFY(find_range_in_ancestor(sy, var2slice(y), hi, lo));
|
||||
pvar const yy = mk_extract(y, hi, lo);
|
||||
|
||||
// rational const x_slice_value = get_value(get_value_node(var2slice(x)));
|
||||
// LOG("v" << x << " slice_value: " << x_slice_value);
|
||||
rational const y_slice_value = get_value(get_value_node(var2slice(y)));
|
||||
LOG("v" << y << " slice_value: " << y_slice_value);
|
||||
// SASSERT(x_slice_value != y_slice_value);
|
||||
add_conclusion(~m_solver.eq(m_solver.var(y), y_slice_value));
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
unsigned x_hi, x_lo;
|
||||
VERIFY(find_range_in_ancestor(sx, var2slice(x), x_hi, x_lo));
|
||||
pvar const xx = mk_extract(x, x_hi, x_lo);
|
||||
LOG("find_range_in_ancestor: v" << x << "[" << x_hi << ":" << x_lo << "] = " << slice_pp(*this, sx) << " --> represented by variable v" << xx);
|
||||
unsigned y_hi, y_lo;
|
||||
VERIFY(find_range_in_ancestor(sy, var2slice(y), y_hi, y_lo));
|
||||
pvar const yy = mk_extract(y, y_hi, y_lo);
|
||||
LOG("find_range_in_ancestor: v" << y << "[" << y_hi << ":" << y_lo << "] = " << slice_pp(*this, sy) << " --> represented by variable v" << yy);
|
||||
// LOG("v" << x << " has solver-value? " << m_solver.is_assigned(x));
|
||||
if (m_solver.is_assigned(x)) LOG("v" << x << " has solver-value " << m_solver.get_value(x));
|
||||
// LOG("v" << y << " has solver-value? " << m_solver.is_assigned(y));
|
||||
if (m_solver.is_assigned(y)) LOG("v" << y << " has solver-value " << m_solver.get_value(y));
|
||||
LOG("v" << x << " is slice " << slice_pp(*this, var2slice(x)));
|
||||
LOG("v" << y << " is slice " << slice_pp(*this, var2slice(y)));
|
||||
SASSERT_EQ(sy->get_root(), var2slice(yy)->get_root());
|
||||
rational const sy_slice_value = get_value(get_value_node(sy));
|
||||
// rational const sy_solver_value = mod2k(machine_div2k(m_solver.get_value(y), lo), hi - lo + 1);
|
||||
c = m_solver.eq(m_solver.var(yy), sy_slice_value);
|
||||
|
||||
NOT_IMPLEMENTED_YET(); // alert when this branch is taken (TODO: check results)
|
||||
// c = m_solver.eq(m_solver.var(yy), sy_slice_value);
|
||||
*/
|
||||
}
|
||||
else {
|
||||
std::cout << "build_conflict_clause (0)" << std::endl;
|
||||
verbose_stream() << "build_conflict_clause (0)" << std::endl;
|
||||
SASSERT(xlit == sat::null_literal);
|
||||
SASSERT(ylit == sat::null_literal);
|
||||
|
||||
unsigned x_hi, x_lo, y_hi, y_lo;
|
||||
VERIFY(find_range_in_ancestor(sx, var2slice(x), x_hi, x_lo));
|
||||
VERIFY(find_range_in_ancestor(sy, var2slice(y), y_hi, y_lo));
|
||||
pvar const xx = mk_extract(x, x_hi, x_lo);
|
||||
pvar const yy = mk_extract(y, y_hi, y_lo);
|
||||
SASSERT_EQ(sx->get_root(), var2slice(xx)->get_root());
|
||||
SASSERT_EQ(sy->get_root(), var2slice(yy)->get_root());
|
||||
rational sval = mod2k(machine_div2k(m_solver.get_value(x), x_lo), x_hi - x_lo + 1);
|
||||
LOG("find_range_in_ancestor: v" << x << "[" << x_hi << ":" << x_lo << "] = " << slice_pp(*this, sx) << " --> represented by variable v" << xx);
|
||||
LOG("find_range_in_ancestor: v" << y << "[" << y_hi << ":" << y_lo << "] = " << slice_pp(*this, sy) << " --> represented by variable v" << yy);
|
||||
SASSERT(xx != yy);
|
||||
c = m_solver.eq(m_solver.var(xx), m_solver.var(yy)); // similar to what Algorithm 1 in BitvectorsMCSAT is doing
|
||||
// unsigned x_hi, x_lo, y_hi, y_lo;
|
||||
// VERIFY(find_range_in_ancestor(sx, var2slice(x), x_hi, x_lo));
|
||||
// VERIFY(find_range_in_ancestor(sy, var2slice(y), y_hi, y_lo));
|
||||
// pvar const xx = mk_extract(x, x_hi, x_lo);
|
||||
// pvar const yy = mk_extract(y, y_hi, y_lo);
|
||||
// SASSERT_EQ(sx->get_root(), var2slice(xx)->get_root());
|
||||
// SASSERT_EQ(sy->get_root(), var2slice(yy)->get_root());
|
||||
// rational sval = mod2k(machine_div2k(m_solver.get_value(x), x_lo), x_hi - x_lo + 1);
|
||||
// LOG("find_range_in_ancestor: v" << x << "[" << x_hi << ":" << x_lo << "] = " << slice_pp(*this, sx) << " --> represented by variable v" << xx);
|
||||
// LOG("find_range_in_ancestor: v" << y << "[" << y_hi << ":" << y_lo << "] = " << slice_pp(*this, sy) << " --> represented by variable v" << yy);
|
||||
LOG("v" << x << " is slice " << slice_pp(*this, var2slice(x)));
|
||||
LOG("v" << y << " is slice " << slice_pp(*this, var2slice(y)));
|
||||
if (m_solver.is_assigned(x)) LOG("v" << x << " has solver-value " << m_solver.get_value(x));
|
||||
if (m_solver.is_assigned(y)) LOG("v" << y << " has solver-value " << m_solver.get_value(y));
|
||||
// SASSERT(xx != yy);
|
||||
// c = m_solver.eq(m_solver.var(xx), m_solver.var(yy)); // similar to what Algorithm 1 in BitvectorsMCSAT is doing
|
||||
// LOG("c: " << lit_pp(m_solver, c));
|
||||
|
||||
NOT_IMPLEMENTED_YET(); // alert when this branch is taken (TODO: check results)
|
||||
rational const x_slice_value = get_value(get_value_node(var2slice(x)));
|
||||
LOG("v" << x << " slice-value: " << x_slice_value);
|
||||
add_conclusion(~m_solver.eq(m_solver.var(x), x_slice_value));
|
||||
|
||||
rational const y_slice_value = get_value(get_value_node(var2slice(y)));
|
||||
LOG("v" << y << " slice-value: " << y_slice_value);
|
||||
add_conclusion(~m_solver.eq(m_solver.var(y), y_slice_value));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (c) {
|
||||
LOG("Conclusion: " << lit_pp(m_solver, c));
|
||||
cb.insert_eval(c);
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
LOG("Conclusion: <conflict>");
|
||||
}
|
||||
// TODO: we don't need clauses like this ... rather set up the conflict core from it
|
||||
|
||||
return cb.build();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue