mirror of
https://github.com/Z3Prover/z3
synced 2025-04-25 01:55:32 +00:00
Merge branch 'polysat' of https://github.com/z3prover/z3 into polysat
This commit is contained in:
commit
f0984a0736
8 changed files with 137 additions and 162 deletions
|
@ -30,10 +30,10 @@ namespace polysat {
|
|||
unsigned_vector m_marks;
|
||||
unsigned m_clock { 0 };
|
||||
|
||||
public:
|
||||
// allocated size (not the number of active variables)
|
||||
unsigned size() const { return m_level.size(); }
|
||||
|
||||
public:
|
||||
sat::bool_var new_var();
|
||||
void del_var(sat::bool_var var);
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ Author:
|
|||
#include "math/polysat/solver.h"
|
||||
#include "math/polysat/log.h"
|
||||
#include "math/polysat/log_helper.h"
|
||||
#include "math/polysat/explain.h"
|
||||
#include "math/polysat/saturation.h"
|
||||
#include "math/polysat/variable_elimination.h"
|
||||
#include <algorithm>
|
||||
|
@ -24,9 +25,12 @@ namespace polysat {
|
|||
|
||||
conflict_core::conflict_core(solver& s) {
|
||||
m_solver = &s;
|
||||
ex_engines.push_back(alloc(ex_polynomial_superposition));
|
||||
for (auto* engine : ex_engines)
|
||||
engine->set_solver(s);
|
||||
ve_engines.push_back(alloc(ve_reduction));
|
||||
// ve_engines.push_back(alloc(ve_forbidden_intervals));
|
||||
inf_engines.push_back(alloc(inf_polynomial_superposition));
|
||||
// inf_engines.push_back(alloc(inf_polynomial_superposition));
|
||||
for (auto* engine : inf_engines)
|
||||
engine->set_solver(s);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -79,6 +83,31 @@ namespace polysat {
|
|||
m_saturation_premises.insert(c, std::move(premises)); // TODO: map doesn't have move-insertion, so this still copies the vector. Maybe we want a clause_ref (but this doesn't work either since c doesn't have a boolean variable yet).
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
void conflict_core::remove(signed_constraint c) {
|
||||
m_constraints.erase(c);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
void conflict_core::replace(signed_constraint c_old, signed_constraint c_new, vector<signed_constraint> c_new_premises) {
|
||||
remove(c_old);
|
||||
insert(c_new, c_new_premises);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
void conflict_core::remove_var(pvar v) {
|
||||
unsigned j = 0;
|
||||
for (unsigned i = 0; i < m_constraints.size(); ++i)
|
||||
if (m_constraints[i]->contains_var(v))
|
||||
m_constraints[j++] = m_constraints[i];
|
||||
m_constraints.shrink(j);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
void conflict_core::keep(signed_constraint c) {
|
||||
SASSERT(!c->has_bvar());
|
||||
cm().ensure_bvar(c.get());
|
||||
LOG("new constraint: " << c);
|
||||
// Insert the temporary constraint from saturation into \Gamma.
|
||||
handle_saturation_premises(c);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
void conflict_core::resolve(constraint_manager const& m, sat::bool_var var, clause const& cl) {
|
||||
// Note: core: x, y, z; corresponds to clause ~x \/ ~y \/ ~z
|
||||
// clause: x \/ u \/ v
|
||||
|
@ -118,17 +147,14 @@ namespace polysat {
|
|||
auto& premises = it->m_value;
|
||||
clause_builder c_lemma(*m_solver);
|
||||
for (auto premise : premises) {
|
||||
handle_saturation_premises(c);
|
||||
handle_saturation_premises(premise);
|
||||
c_lemma.push_literal(~premise.blit());
|
||||
}
|
||||
c_lemma.push_literal(c.blit());
|
||||
clause* cl = cm().store(c_lemma.build());
|
||||
if (cl->size() == 1)
|
||||
c->set_unit_clause(cl);
|
||||
// TODO: this should be backtrackable (unless clause is unit).
|
||||
// => add at the end and update pop_levels to replay appropriately
|
||||
m_solver->assign_bool_backtrackable(c.blit(), cl, nullptr);
|
||||
m_solver->activate_constraint(c);
|
||||
m_solver->assign_bool(c.blit(), cl, nullptr);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/** Create fallback lemma that excludes the current search state */
|
||||
|
@ -169,13 +195,8 @@ namespace polysat {
|
|||
// TODO: try a final core reduction step?
|
||||
|
||||
for (auto c : m_constraints) {
|
||||
if (!c->has_bvar()) {
|
||||
// temporary constraint -> keep it
|
||||
cm().ensure_bvar(c.get());
|
||||
LOG("new constraint: " << c);
|
||||
// Insert the temporary constraint from saturation into \Gamma.
|
||||
handle_saturation_premises(c);
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (!c->has_bvar())
|
||||
keep(c);
|
||||
lemma.push(c);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -211,14 +232,26 @@ namespace polysat {
|
|||
// NOTE:
|
||||
// In the "standard" case where "v = val" is on the stack:
|
||||
// - cjust_v contains true constraints
|
||||
// - core contains both false and true constraints... (originally only false ones, but additional true ones may come from saturation).
|
||||
// - core contains both false and true constraints... (originally only false ones, but additional true ones may come from saturation?).
|
||||
// In the case where no assignment to v is on the stack, i.e., conflict_var == v and viable(v) = \emptyset:
|
||||
// - the constraints in cjust_v cannot be evaluated.
|
||||
// - TODO: what to do here? pick some value?
|
||||
// - for now, we just pick a value. TODO: revise later
|
||||
/*
|
||||
if (conflict_var() == v) {
|
||||
// Temporary assignment
|
||||
// (actually we shouldn't just pick any value, but one that makes at least one constraint true...)
|
||||
LOG_H1("WARNING: temporary assignment of conflict_var");
|
||||
m_solver->assign_core(v, m_solver->m_value[v], justification::propagation(m_solver->m_level));
|
||||
}
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
||||
for (auto c : cjust_v)
|
||||
insert(c);
|
||||
|
||||
for (auto* engine : ex_engines)
|
||||
if (engine->try_explain(v, *this))
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
|
||||
// No value resolution method was successful => fall back to saturation and variable elimination
|
||||
while (true) { // TODO: limit?
|
||||
// TODO: as a last resort, substitute v by m_value[v]?
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ Author:
|
|||
namespace polysat {
|
||||
|
||||
class solver;
|
||||
class explainer;
|
||||
class inference_engine;
|
||||
class variable_elimination_engine;
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -40,6 +41,7 @@ namespace polysat {
|
|||
|
||||
solver* m_solver = nullptr;
|
||||
constraint_manager& cm();
|
||||
scoped_ptr_vector<explainer> ex_engines;
|
||||
scoped_ptr_vector<variable_elimination_engine> ve_engines;
|
||||
scoped_ptr_vector<inference_engine> inf_engines;
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -77,7 +79,13 @@ namespace polysat {
|
|||
|
||||
void insert(signed_constraint c);
|
||||
void insert(signed_constraint c, vector<signed_constraint> premises);
|
||||
void remove(signed_constraint c) { NOT_IMPLEMENTED_YET(); }
|
||||
void remove(signed_constraint c);
|
||||
void replace(signed_constraint c_old, signed_constraint c_new, vector<signed_constraint> c_new_premises);
|
||||
|
||||
/** remove all constraints that contain the variable v */
|
||||
void remove_var(pvar v);
|
||||
|
||||
void keep(signed_constraint c);
|
||||
|
||||
/** Perform boolean resolution with the clause upon variable 'var'.
|
||||
* Precondition: core/clause contain complementary 'var'-literals.
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -99,7 +99,7 @@ namespace polysat {
|
|||
pdd lhs;
|
||||
pdd rhs;
|
||||
bool is_strict;
|
||||
constraint const* src;
|
||||
constraint const* src; // TODO: should be signed_constraint now
|
||||
inequality(pdd const & lhs, pdd const & rhs, bool is_strict, constraint const* src):
|
||||
lhs(lhs), rhs(rhs), is_strict(is_strict), src(src) {}
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -19,108 +19,71 @@ namespace polysat {
|
|||
|
||||
constraint_manager& explainer::cm() { return s().m_constraints; }
|
||||
|
||||
signed_constraint ex_polynomial_superposition::resolve1(pvar v, signed_constraint c1, signed_constraint c2) {
|
||||
// c1 is true, c2 is false
|
||||
SASSERT(c1.is_currently_true(s()));
|
||||
SASSERT(c2.is_currently_false(s()));
|
||||
LOG("c1: " << c1);
|
||||
LOG("c2: " << c2);
|
||||
pdd a = c1->to_eq().p();
|
||||
pdd b = c2->to_eq().p();
|
||||
pdd r = a;
|
||||
if (!a.resolve(v, b, r) && !b.resolve(v, a, r))
|
||||
return {};
|
||||
unsigned const lvl = std::max(c1->level(), c2->level());
|
||||
signed_constraint c = cm().eq(lvl, r);
|
||||
LOG("resolved: " << c << " currently false? " << c.is_currently_false(s()));
|
||||
if (!c.is_currently_false(s()))
|
||||
return {};
|
||||
return c;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
bool ex_polynomial_superposition::is_positive_equality_over(pvar v, signed_constraint const& c) {
|
||||
return c.is_positive() && c->is_eq() && c->contains_var(v);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// TODO(later): check superposition into disequality again (see notes)
|
||||
bool ex_polynomial_superposition::try_explain(pvar v, /* vector<signed_constraint> const& cjust_v, */ conflict_core& core) {
|
||||
// TODO: core saturation premises are from \Gamma (i.e., has_bvar)... but here we further restrict to the core; might need to revise
|
||||
// -- especially: should take into account results from previous saturations (they will be in \Gamma, but only if we use the constraint or one of its descendants for the lemma)
|
||||
// actually: we want to take one from the current cjust (currently true) and one from the conflict (currently false)
|
||||
|
||||
// TODO: resolve multiple times... a single time might not be enough to eliminate the variable.
|
||||
|
||||
LOG_H3("Trying polynomial superposition...");
|
||||
// true = done, false = abort, undef = continue
|
||||
lbool ex_polynomial_superposition::try_explain1(pvar v, conflict_core& core) {
|
||||
for (auto it1 = core.begin(); it1 != core.end(); ++it1) {
|
||||
signed_constraint c1 = *it1;
|
||||
if (!c1->has_bvar())
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
if (!c1.is_positive())
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
if (!c1->is_eq())
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
if (!c1->contains_var(v))
|
||||
if (!is_positive_equality_over(v, c1))
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
if (!c1.is_currently_true(s()))
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
|
||||
for (auto it2 = core.begin(); it2 != core.end(); ++it2) {
|
||||
signed_constraint c2 = *it2;
|
||||
if (!c2->has_bvar())
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
if (!c2.is_positive())
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
if (!c2->is_eq())
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
if (!c2->contains_var(v))
|
||||
if (!is_positive_equality_over(v, c2))
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
if (!c2.is_currently_false(s()))
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
|
||||
// TODO: separate method for this; then try_explain1 and try_explain* for multi-steps; replace the false constraint in the core.
|
||||
// c1 is true, c2 is false
|
||||
LOG("c1: " << c1);
|
||||
LOG("c2: " << c2);
|
||||
pdd a = c1->to_eq().p();
|
||||
pdd b = c2->to_eq().p();
|
||||
pdd r = a;
|
||||
if (!a.resolve(v, b, r) && !b.resolve(v, a, r))
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
unsigned const lvl = std::max(c1->level(), c2->level());
|
||||
signed_constraint c = cm().eq(lvl, r);
|
||||
LOG("resolved: " << c << " currently false? " << c.is_currently_false(s()));
|
||||
if (!c.is_currently_false(s()))
|
||||
signed_constraint c = resolve1(v, c1, c2);
|
||||
if (!c)
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
vector<signed_constraint> premises;
|
||||
premises.push_back(c1);
|
||||
premises.push_back(c2);
|
||||
core.replace(c2, c, std::move(premises));
|
||||
if (!c->contains_var(v)) {
|
||||
core.reset(); // TODO: doesn't work; this removes the premises as well... / instead: remove the false one.
|
||||
core.insert(c, std::move(premises));
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
core.insert(c, std::move(premises));
|
||||
}
|
||||
core.keep(c);
|
||||
core.remove_var(v);
|
||||
return l_true;
|
||||
} else
|
||||
return l_undef;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
return l_false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
// DEBUG_CODE({
|
||||
// if (lemma) {
|
||||
// LOG("New lemma: " << *lemma);
|
||||
// for (auto* c : lemma->new_constraints()) {
|
||||
// LOG("New constraint: " << show_deref(c));
|
||||
// }
|
||||
// // All constraints in the lemma must be false in the conflict state
|
||||
// for (auto lit : lemma->literals()) {
|
||||
// if (m_solver.m_bvars.value(lit) == l_false)
|
||||
// continue;
|
||||
// SASSERT(m_solver.m_bvars.value(lit) != l_true);
|
||||
// constraint* c = m_solver.m_constraints.lookup(lit.var());
|
||||
// SASSERT(c);
|
||||
// tmp_assign _t(c, lit);
|
||||
// // if (c->is_currently_true(m_solver)) {
|
||||
// // LOG("ERROR: constraint is true: " << show_deref(c));
|
||||
// // SASSERT(false);
|
||||
// // }
|
||||
// // SASSERT(!c->is_currently_true(m_solver));
|
||||
// // SASSERT(c->is_currently_false(m_solver)); // TODO: pvar v may not have a value at this point...
|
||||
// }
|
||||
// }
|
||||
// else {
|
||||
// LOG("No lemma");
|
||||
// }
|
||||
// });
|
||||
|
||||
// m_var = null_var;
|
||||
// m_cjust_v.reset();
|
||||
// return lemma;
|
||||
// }
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
bool ex_polynomial_superposition::try_explain(pvar v, conflict_core& core) {
|
||||
LOG_H3("Trying polynomial superposition...");
|
||||
lbool result = l_undef;
|
||||
while (result == l_undef)
|
||||
result = try_explain1(v, core);
|
||||
LOG("success? " << result);
|
||||
return result;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -35,7 +35,12 @@ namespace polysat {
|
|||
};
|
||||
|
||||
class ex_polynomial_superposition : public explainer {
|
||||
bool try_explain(pvar v, /* vector<signed_constraint> const& cjust_v, */ conflict_core& core) override;
|
||||
private:
|
||||
bool is_positive_equality_over(pvar v, signed_constraint const& c);
|
||||
signed_constraint resolve1(pvar v, signed_constraint c1, signed_constraint c2);
|
||||
lbool try_explain1(pvar v, conflict_core& core);
|
||||
public:
|
||||
bool try_explain(pvar v, conflict_core& core) override;
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -155,7 +155,7 @@ namespace polysat {
|
|||
m_linear_solver.new_constraint(*c.get());
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
if (activate && !is_conflict())
|
||||
activate_constraint_base(c);
|
||||
propagate_bool(c.blit(), unit);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
void solver::assign_eh(unsigned dep, bool is_true) {
|
||||
|
@ -191,6 +191,8 @@ namespace polysat {
|
|||
}
|
||||
linear_propagate();
|
||||
SASSERT(wlist_invariant());
|
||||
if (!is_conflict())
|
||||
SASSERT(assignment_invariant());
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
void solver::linear_propagate() {
|
||||
|
@ -208,9 +210,8 @@ namespace polysat {
|
|||
void solver::propagate(sat::literal lit) {
|
||||
LOG_H2("Propagate boolean literal " << lit);
|
||||
signed_constraint c = m_constraints.lookup(lit);
|
||||
(void)c;
|
||||
SASSERT(c);
|
||||
// c->narrow(*this);
|
||||
activate_constraint(c);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
void solver::propagate(pvar v) {
|
||||
|
@ -576,22 +577,10 @@ namespace polysat {
|
|||
if (!lemma)
|
||||
return;
|
||||
SASSERT(lemma->size() > 0);
|
||||
SASSERT(m_conflict_level <= m_justification[v].level()); // ???
|
||||
lemma->set_justified_var(v);
|
||||
clause* cl = lemma.get();
|
||||
add_lemma(std::move(lemma));
|
||||
if (cl->size() == 1) {
|
||||
sat::literal lit = (*cl)[0];
|
||||
signed_constraint c = m_constraints.lookup(lit);
|
||||
c->set_unit_clause(cl);
|
||||
push_cjust(v, c);
|
||||
activate_constraint_base(c);
|
||||
}
|
||||
else {
|
||||
sat::literal lit = decide_bool(*cl);
|
||||
SASSERT(lit != sat::null_literal);
|
||||
signed_constraint c = m_constraints.lookup(lit);
|
||||
}
|
||||
add_lemma(lemma);
|
||||
sat::literal lit = decide_bool(*lemma);
|
||||
SASSERT(lit != sat::null_literal);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Guess a literal from the given clause; returns the guessed constraint
|
||||
|
@ -747,53 +736,23 @@ namespace polysat {
|
|||
void solver::decide_bool(sat::literal lit, clause& lemma) {
|
||||
push_level();
|
||||
LOG_H2("Decide boolean literal " << lit << " @ " << m_level);
|
||||
assign_bool_backtrackable(lit, nullptr, &lemma);
|
||||
assign_bool(lit, nullptr, &lemma);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
void solver::propagate_bool(sat::literal lit, clause* reason) {
|
||||
LOG("Propagate boolean literal " << lit << " @ " << m_level << " by " << show_deref(reason));
|
||||
SASSERT(reason);
|
||||
if (reason->size() == 1) {
|
||||
SASSERT((*reason)[0] == lit);
|
||||
signed_constraint c = m_constraints.lookup(lit);
|
||||
// m_redundant.push_back(c);
|
||||
activate_constraint_base(c);
|
||||
}
|
||||
else
|
||||
assign_bool_backtrackable(lit, reason, nullptr);
|
||||
assign_bool(lit, reason, nullptr);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// Assign a boolean literal and put it on the search stack,
|
||||
/// and activate the corresponding constraint.
|
||||
void solver::assign_bool_backtrackable(sat::literal lit, clause* reason, clause* lemma) {
|
||||
assign_bool_core(lit, reason, lemma);
|
||||
void solver::assign_bool(sat::literal lit, clause* reason, clause* lemma) {
|
||||
LOG("Assigning boolean literal: " << lit);
|
||||
m_bvars.assign(lit, m_level, reason, lemma);
|
||||
|
||||
m_trail.push_back(trail_instr_t::assign_bool_i);
|
||||
m_search.push_boolean(lit);
|
||||
|
||||
signed_constraint c = m_constraints.lookup(lit);
|
||||
activate_constraint(c);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// Activate a constraint at the base level.
|
||||
/// Used for external unit constraints and unit consequences.
|
||||
void solver::activate_constraint_base(signed_constraint c) {
|
||||
SASSERT(c);
|
||||
LOG("\n" << *this);
|
||||
// c must be in m_original or m_redundant so it can be deactivated properly when popping the base level
|
||||
SASSERT_EQ(std::count(m_original.begin(), m_original.end(), c) + std::count(m_redundant.begin(), m_redundant.end(), c), 1);
|
||||
// TODO: how is the boolean assignment for this undone? when we remove the constraint by popping a solver level.
|
||||
// if the constraint is deleted by popping it, then it's fine because we will remove the boolean variable.
|
||||
// however, we now dedup constraints so it might have been promoted to a lower level and thus live longer.
|
||||
// so this bool assignment needs to be backtrackable too...
|
||||
assign_bool_core(c.blit(), nullptr, nullptr);
|
||||
activate_constraint(c);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// Assign a boolean literal
|
||||
void solver::assign_bool_core(sat::literal lit, clause* reason, clause* lemma) {
|
||||
LOG("Assigning boolean literal: " << lit);
|
||||
m_bvars.assign(lit, m_level, reason, lemma);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
|
@ -817,7 +776,7 @@ namespace polysat {
|
|||
void solver::deactivate_constraint(signed_constraint c) {
|
||||
LOG("Deactivating constraint: " << c);
|
||||
erase_watch(c);
|
||||
c->set_unit_clause(nullptr);
|
||||
// c->set_unit_clause(nullptr);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
void solver::backjump(unsigned new_level) {
|
||||
|
@ -846,6 +805,7 @@ namespace polysat {
|
|||
m_redundant_clauses.push_back(cl);
|
||||
if (cl->size() == 1) {
|
||||
signed_constraint c = m_constraints.lookup((*cl)[0]);
|
||||
c->set_unit_clause(cl);
|
||||
insert_constraint(m_redundant, c);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -994,6 +954,18 @@ namespace polysat {
|
|||
return true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/** Check that boolean assignment and constraint evaluation are consistent */
|
||||
bool solver::assignment_invariant() {
|
||||
for (sat::bool_var v = m_bvars.size(); v-- > 0; ) {
|
||||
sat::literal lit(v);
|
||||
if (m_bvars.value(lit) == l_true)
|
||||
SASSERT(!m_constraints.lookup(lit).is_currently_false(*this));
|
||||
if (m_bvars.value(lit) == l_false)
|
||||
SASSERT(!m_constraints.lookup(lit).is_currently_true(*this));
|
||||
}
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// Check that all original constraints are satisfied by the current model.
|
||||
bool solver::verify_sat() {
|
||||
LOG_H1("Checking current model...");
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -113,8 +113,6 @@ namespace polysat {
|
|||
svector<trail_instr_t> m_trail;
|
||||
unsigned_vector m_qhead_trail;
|
||||
unsigned_vector m_cjust_trail;
|
||||
ptr_vector<constraint> m_activate_trail;
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
unsigned_vector m_base_levels; // External clients can push/pop scope.
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -158,10 +156,7 @@ namespace polysat {
|
|||
void pop_levels(unsigned num_levels);
|
||||
void pop_constraints(signed_constraints& cs);
|
||||
|
||||
void assign_bool_backtrackable(sat::literal lit, clause* reason, clause* lemma);
|
||||
void activate_constraint_base(signed_constraint c);
|
||||
void assign_bool_core(sat::literal lit, clause* reason, clause* lemma);
|
||||
// void assign_bool_base(sat::literal lit);
|
||||
void assign_bool(sat::literal lit, clause* reason, clause* lemma);
|
||||
void activate_constraint(signed_constraint c);
|
||||
void deactivate_constraint(signed_constraint c);
|
||||
sat::literal decide_bool(clause& lemma);
|
||||
|
@ -195,8 +190,6 @@ namespace polysat {
|
|||
void set_marks(conflict_core const& cc);
|
||||
void set_marks(constraint const& c);
|
||||
|
||||
unsigned m_conflict_level { 0 };
|
||||
|
||||
bool can_decide() const { return !m_free_vars.empty(); }
|
||||
void decide();
|
||||
void decide(pvar v);
|
||||
|
@ -237,6 +230,7 @@ namespace polysat {
|
|||
bool invariant();
|
||||
static bool invariant(signed_constraints const& cs);
|
||||
bool wlist_invariant();
|
||||
bool assignment_invariant();
|
||||
bool verify_sat();
|
||||
|
||||
public:
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue