mirror of
https://github.com/Z3Prover/z3
synced 2025-05-05 23:05:46 +00:00
add some validation
Signed-off-by: Nikolaj Bjorner <nbjorner@microsoft.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
d8f0926620
commit
eddc03b2eb
3 changed files with 35 additions and 144 deletions
|
@ -88,62 +88,6 @@ namespace polysat {
|
|||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
// LOG_H3("Attempting to explain conflict for v" << v);
|
||||
// m_var = v;
|
||||
// m_cjust_v = cjust;
|
||||
|
||||
// for (auto* c : cjust)
|
||||
// m_conflict.push_back(c);
|
||||
|
||||
// for (auto* c : m_conflict.units())
|
||||
// LOG("Constraint: " << show_deref(c));
|
||||
// for (auto* c : m_conflict.clauses())
|
||||
// LOG("Clause: " << show_deref(c));
|
||||
|
||||
// // TODO: this is a temporary workaround! we should not get any undef constraints at this point
|
||||
// constraints_and_clauses confl = std::move(m_conflict);
|
||||
// SASSERT(m_conflict.empty());
|
||||
// for (auto* c : confl.units())
|
||||
// if (!c->is_undef())
|
||||
// m_conflict.push_back(c);
|
||||
// for (auto* c : confl.clauses())
|
||||
// m_conflict.push_back(c);
|
||||
|
||||
// // Collect unit constraints
|
||||
// //
|
||||
// // TODO: the distinction between units and unit clauses is a bit awkward; maybe it should be removed.
|
||||
// // We could then also remove the hybrid container 'constraints_and_clauses' by a clause_ref_vector
|
||||
// SASSERT(m_conflict_units.empty());
|
||||
// for (constraint* c : m_conflict.units())
|
||||
// // if (c->is_eq())
|
||||
// m_conflict_units.push_back(c);
|
||||
// for (auto clause : m_conflict.clauses()) {
|
||||
// if (clause->size() == 1) {
|
||||
// sat::literal lit = (*clause)[0];
|
||||
// constraint* c = m_solver.m_constraints.lookup(lit.var());
|
||||
// LOG("unit clause: " << show_deref(c));
|
||||
// // Morally, a derived unit clause is always asserted at the base level.
|
||||
// // (Even if we don't want to keep this one around. But maybe we should? Do we want to reconstruct proofs?)
|
||||
// c->set_unit_clause(clause);
|
||||
// c->assign(!lit.sign());
|
||||
// // this clause is really a unit.
|
||||
// // if (c->is_eq()) {
|
||||
// m_conflict_units.push_back(c);
|
||||
// // }
|
||||
// }
|
||||
// }
|
||||
|
||||
// // TODO: we should share work done for examining constraints between different resolution methods
|
||||
// clause_ref lemma;
|
||||
// if (!lemma) lemma = by_polynomial_superposition();
|
||||
// if (!lemma) lemma = by_ugt_x();
|
||||
// if (!lemma) lemma = by_ugt_y();
|
||||
// if (!lemma) lemma = by_ugt_z();
|
||||
// if (!lemma) lemma = y_ule_ax_and_x_ule_z();
|
||||
|
||||
// DEBUG_CODE({
|
||||
// if (lemma) {
|
||||
// LOG("New lemma: " << *lemma);
|
||||
|
@ -179,81 +123,4 @@ namespace polysat {
|
|||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
// /// [z] z <= y' /\ zx > yx ==> Ω*(x,y') \/ y'x > yx
|
||||
// /// [z] z <= y' /\ yx <= zx ==> Ω*(x,y') \/ yx <= y'x
|
||||
// clause_ref conflict_explainer::by_ugt_z() {
|
||||
// LOG_H3("Try z <= y' && zx > yx where z := v" << m_var);
|
||||
|
||||
// pdd const z = m_solver.var(m_var);
|
||||
// unsigned const sz = m_solver.size(m_var);
|
||||
// pdd const zero = m_solver.sz2pdd(sz).zero();
|
||||
|
||||
// // Collect constraints of shape "z <= _"
|
||||
// vector<inequality> ds;
|
||||
// for (auto* d1 : m_conflict.units()) {
|
||||
// auto d = d1->as_inequality();
|
||||
// // TODO: a*y where 'a' divides 'x' should also be easy to handle (assuming for now they're numbers)
|
||||
// // TODO: also z < y' should follow the same pattern.
|
||||
// if (d.lhs != z)
|
||||
// continue;
|
||||
// LOG("z <= y' candidate: " << show_deref(d.src));
|
||||
// ds.push_back(std::move(d));
|
||||
// }
|
||||
// if (ds.empty())
|
||||
// return nullptr;
|
||||
|
||||
// // Find constraint of shape: yx <= zx
|
||||
// for (auto* c1 : m_conflict.units()) {
|
||||
// auto c = c1->as_inequality();
|
||||
// if (c.rhs.degree(m_var) != 1)
|
||||
// continue;
|
||||
// pdd x = zero;
|
||||
// pdd rest = zero;
|
||||
// c.rhs.factor(m_var, 1, x, rest);
|
||||
// if (!rest.is_zero())
|
||||
// continue;
|
||||
// // TODO: in principle, 'x' could be any polynomial. However, we need to divide the lhs by x, and we don't have general polynomial division yet.
|
||||
// // so for now we just allow the form 'value*variable'.
|
||||
// // (extension to arbitrary monomials for 'x' should be fairly easy too)
|
||||
// if (!x.is_unary())
|
||||
// continue;
|
||||
// unsigned x_var = x.var();
|
||||
// rational x_coeff = x.hi().val();
|
||||
// pdd xy = zero;
|
||||
// if (!c.lhs.try_div(x_coeff, xy))
|
||||
// continue;
|
||||
// pdd y = zero;
|
||||
// xy.factor(x_var, 1, y, rest);
|
||||
// if (!rest.is_zero())
|
||||
// continue;
|
||||
|
||||
// LOG("zx > yx: " << show_deref(c.src));
|
||||
|
||||
// // TODO: for now, we just try all ds
|
||||
// for (auto const& d : ds) {
|
||||
// unsigned const lvl = std::max(c.src->level(), d.src->level());
|
||||
// pdd const& y_prime = d.rhs;
|
||||
|
||||
// clause_builder clause(m_solver);
|
||||
// clause.push_literal(~c.src->blit());
|
||||
// clause.push_literal(~d.src->blit());
|
||||
// // Omega^*(x, y')
|
||||
// if (!push_omega_mul(clause, lvl, sz, x, y_prime))
|
||||
// continue;
|
||||
// // yx <= y'x
|
||||
// constraint_literal yx_le_ypx;
|
||||
// if (c.is_strict || d.is_strict)
|
||||
// yx_le_ypx = m_solver.m_constraints.ult(lvl, y*x, y_prime*x);
|
||||
// else
|
||||
// yx_le_ypx = m_solver.m_constraints.ule(lvl, y*x, y_prime*x);
|
||||
// LOG("y'x>yx: " << show_deref(yx_le_ypx));
|
||||
// clause.push_new_constraint(std::move(yx_le_ypx));
|
||||
|
||||
// return clause.build();
|
||||
// }
|
||||
// }
|
||||
// return nullptr;
|
||||
// }
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue