mirror of
https://github.com/Z3Prover/z3
synced 2025-04-22 16:45:31 +00:00
Should we really prefer bit constraints?
This commit is contained in:
parent
625ec18b0f
commit
ec64b93edb
1 changed files with 6 additions and 1 deletions
|
@ -1065,8 +1065,13 @@ namespace {
|
|||
return false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
// just override; we prefer bit constraints over parity as those are easier for subsumption to remove
|
||||
// do we just introduce a new justification here that subsumption will remove anyway?
|
||||
// the only way it will not is if all bits are overwritten like this.
|
||||
// but in that case we basically replace one parity constraint by multiple bit constraints?
|
||||
// verbose_stream() << "Adding bit constraint: " << e->src[0] << " (" << bit.position << ")\n";
|
||||
out_fbi.set_just(bit.position, e1);
|
||||
if (prev == l_undef) {
|
||||
out_fbi.set_just(bit.position, e1);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
else if (src->is_eq() &&
|
||||
simplify_clause::get_lsb(s.subst(src->to_ule().lhs()), s.subst(src->to_ule().rhs()), p, lsb, src.is_positive()) && p.is_var()) {
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue