3
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/Z3Prover/z3 synced 2025-05-09 00:35:47 +00:00

Z3 sources

Signed-off-by: Leonardo de Moura <leonardo@microsoft.com>
This commit is contained in:
Leonardo de Moura 2012-10-02 11:35:25 -07:00
parent 3f9edad676
commit e9eab22e5c
1186 changed files with 381859 additions and 0 deletions

64
lib/nlsat_explain.h Normal file
View file

@ -0,0 +1,64 @@
/*++
Copyright (c) 2012 Microsoft Corporation
Module Name:
nlsat_explain.h
Abstract:
Functor that implements the "explain" procedure defined in Dejan and Leo's paper.
Author:
Leonardo de Moura (leonardo) 2012-01-13.
Revision History:
--*/
#ifndef _NLSAT_EXPLAIN_H_
#define _NLSAT_EXPLAIN_H_
#include"nlsat_solver.h"
#include"nlsat_scoped_literal_vector.h"
#include"polynomial_cache.h"
namespace nlsat {
class evaluator;
class explain {
struct imp;
imp * m_imp;
public:
explain(solver & s, assignment const & x2v, polynomial::cache & u, atom_vector const & atoms, atom_vector const & x2eq,
evaluator & ev);
~explain();
void reset();
void set_simplify_cores(bool f);
void set_full_dimensional(bool f);
void set_minimize_cores(bool f);
/**
\brief Given a set of literals ls[0], ... ls[n-1] s.t.
- n > 0
- all of them are arithmetic literals.
- all of them have the same maximal variable.
- (ls[0] and ... and ls[n-1]) is infeasible in the current interpretation.
Let x be the maximal variable in {ls[0], ..., ls[n-1]}.
Remark: the current interpretation assigns all variables in ls[0], ..., ls[n-1] but x.
This procedure stores in result a set of literals: s_1, ..., s_m
s.t.
- (s_1 or ... or s_m or ~ls[0] or ... or ~ls[n-1]) is a valid clause
- s_1, ..., s_m do not contain variable x.
- s_1, ..., s_m are false in the current interpretation
*/
void operator()(unsigned n, literal const * ls, scoped_literal_vector & result);
};
};
#endif