mirror of
https://github.com/Z3Prover/z3
synced 2025-04-23 09:05:31 +00:00
create proofs folder, move proof-post-order utility to proofs directory, fix regression with proofs
Signed-off-by: Nikolaj Bjorner <nbjorner@microsoft.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
72c9134424
commit
d67f3c1466
19 changed files with 53 additions and 54 deletions
|
@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
|
|||
z3_add_component(proof_checker
|
||||
z3_add_component(proofs
|
||||
SOURCES
|
||||
proof_checker.cpp
|
||||
proof_utils.cpp
|
||||
COMPONENT_DEPENDENCIES
|
||||
rewriter
|
||||
)
|
||||
)
|
|
@ -4,10 +4,9 @@ Copyright (c) 2015 Microsoft Corporation
|
|||
|
||||
--*/
|
||||
|
||||
#include "ast/proof_checker/proof_checker.h"
|
||||
#include "ast/proofs/proof_checker.h"
|
||||
#include "ast/ast_ll_pp.h"
|
||||
#include "ast/ast_pp.h"
|
||||
// include "spc_decl_plugin.h"
|
||||
#include "ast/ast_smt_pp.h"
|
||||
#include "ast/arith_decl_plugin.h"
|
||||
#include "ast/rewriter/th_rewriter.h"
|
333
src/ast/proofs/proof_utils.cpp
Normal file
333
src/ast/proofs/proof_utils.cpp
Normal file
|
@ -0,0 +1,333 @@
|
|||
/*++
|
||||
Copyright (c) 2017 Arie Gurfinkel
|
||||
|
||||
Module Name:
|
||||
|
||||
proof_utils.cpp
|
||||
|
||||
Abstract:
|
||||
Utilities to traverse and manipulate proofs
|
||||
|
||||
Author:
|
||||
Bernhard Gleiss
|
||||
Arie Gurfinkel
|
||||
|
||||
Revision History:
|
||||
|
||||
--*/
|
||||
|
||||
#include "ast/ast_util.h"
|
||||
#include "ast/ast_pp.h"
|
||||
#include "ast/proofs/proof_utils.h"
|
||||
#include "ast/proofs/proof_checker.h"
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
proof_post_order::proof_post_order(proof* root, ast_manager& manager) : m(manager)
|
||||
{m_todo.push_back(root);}
|
||||
|
||||
bool proof_post_order::hasNext()
|
||||
{return !m_todo.empty();}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* iterative post-order depth-first search (DFS) through the proof DAG
|
||||
*/
|
||||
proof* proof_post_order::next()
|
||||
{
|
||||
while (!m_todo.empty()) {
|
||||
proof* currentNode = m_todo.back();
|
||||
|
||||
// if we haven't already visited the current unit
|
||||
if (!m_visited.is_marked(currentNode)) {
|
||||
bool existsUnvisitedParent = false;
|
||||
|
||||
// add unprocessed premises to stack for DFS.
|
||||
// If there is at least one unprocessed premise, don't compute the result
|
||||
// for currentProof now, but wait until those unprocessed premises are processed.
|
||||
for (unsigned i = 0; i < m.get_num_parents(currentNode); ++i) {
|
||||
SASSERT(m.is_proof(currentNode->get_arg(i)));
|
||||
proof* premise = to_app(currentNode->get_arg(i));
|
||||
|
||||
// if we haven't visited the current premise yet
|
||||
if (!m_visited.is_marked(premise)) {
|
||||
// add it to the stack
|
||||
m_todo.push_back(premise);
|
||||
existsUnvisitedParent = true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// if we already visited all parent-inferences, we can visit the inference too
|
||||
if (!existsUnvisitedParent) {
|
||||
m_visited.mark(currentNode, true);
|
||||
m_todo.pop_back();
|
||||
return currentNode;
|
||||
}
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
m_todo.pop_back();
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
// we have already iterated through all inferences
|
||||
return nullptr;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class reduce_hypotheses {
|
||||
ast_manager &m;
|
||||
// tracking all created expressions
|
||||
expr_ref_vector m_pinned;
|
||||
|
||||
// cache for the transformation
|
||||
obj_map<proof, proof*> m_cache;
|
||||
|
||||
// map from unit literals to their hypotheses-free derivations
|
||||
obj_map<expr, proof*> m_units;
|
||||
|
||||
// -- all hypotheses in the the proof
|
||||
obj_hashtable<expr> m_hyps;
|
||||
|
||||
// marks hypothetical proofs
|
||||
ast_mark m_hypmark;
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
// stack
|
||||
ptr_vector<proof> m_todo;
|
||||
|
||||
void reset()
|
||||
{
|
||||
m_cache.reset();
|
||||
m_units.reset();
|
||||
m_hyps.reset();
|
||||
m_hypmark.reset();
|
||||
m_pinned.reset();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
bool compute_mark1(proof *pr)
|
||||
{
|
||||
bool hyp_mark = false;
|
||||
// lemmas clear all hypotheses
|
||||
if (!m.is_lemma(pr)) {
|
||||
for (unsigned i = 0, sz = m.get_num_parents(pr); i < sz; ++i) {
|
||||
if (m_hypmark.is_marked(m.get_parent(pr, i))) {
|
||||
hyp_mark = true;
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
m_hypmark.mark(pr, hyp_mark);
|
||||
return hyp_mark;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
void compute_marks(proof* pr) {
|
||||
proof *p;
|
||||
proof_post_order pit(pr, m);
|
||||
while (pit.hasNext()) {
|
||||
p = pit.next();
|
||||
if (m.is_hypothesis(p)) {
|
||||
m_hypmark.mark(p, true);
|
||||
m_hyps.insert(m.get_fact(p));
|
||||
}
|
||||
else {
|
||||
bool hyp_mark = compute_mark1(p);
|
||||
// collect units that are hyp-free and are used as hypotheses somewhere
|
||||
if (!hyp_mark && m.has_fact(p) && m_hyps.contains(m.get_fact(p))) {
|
||||
m_units.insert(m.get_fact(p), p);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
void find_units(proof *pr)
|
||||
{
|
||||
// optional. not implemented yet.
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
void reduce(proof* pf, proof_ref &out)
|
||||
{
|
||||
proof *res = NULL;
|
||||
|
||||
m_todo.reset();
|
||||
m_todo.push_back(pf);
|
||||
ptr_buffer<proof> args;
|
||||
bool dirty = false;
|
||||
|
||||
while (!m_todo.empty()) {
|
||||
proof *p, *tmp, *pp;
|
||||
unsigned todo_sz;
|
||||
|
||||
p = m_todo.back();
|
||||
if (m_cache.find(p, tmp)) {
|
||||
res = tmp;
|
||||
m_todo.pop_back();
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
dirty = false;
|
||||
args.reset();
|
||||
todo_sz = m_todo.size();
|
||||
for (unsigned i = 0, sz = m.get_num_parents(p); i < sz; ++i) {
|
||||
pp = m.get_parent(p, i);
|
||||
if (m_cache.find(pp, tmp)) {
|
||||
args.push_back(tmp);
|
||||
dirty = dirty || pp != tmp;
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
m_todo.push_back(pp);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (todo_sz < m_todo.size()) { continue; }
|
||||
else { m_todo.pop_back(); }
|
||||
|
||||
if (m.is_hypothesis(p)) {
|
||||
// hyp: replace by a corresponding unit
|
||||
if (m_units.find(m.get_fact(p), tmp)) {
|
||||
res = tmp;
|
||||
} else { res = p; }
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
else if (!dirty) { res = p; }
|
||||
|
||||
else if (m.is_lemma(p)) {
|
||||
//lemma: reduce the premise; remove reduced consequences from conclusion
|
||||
SASSERT(args.size() == 1);
|
||||
res = mk_lemma_core(args.get(0), m.get_fact(p));
|
||||
compute_mark1(res);
|
||||
} else if (m.is_unit_resolution(p)) {
|
||||
// unit: reduce untis; reduce the first premise; rebuild unit resolution
|
||||
res = mk_unit_resolution_core(args.size(), args.c_ptr());
|
||||
compute_mark1(res);
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
// other: reduce all premises; reapply
|
||||
if (m.has_fact(p)) { args.push_back(to_app(m.get_fact(p))); }
|
||||
SASSERT(p->get_decl()->get_arity() == args.size());
|
||||
res = m.mk_app(p->get_decl(), args.size(), (expr * const*)args.c_ptr());
|
||||
m_pinned.push_back(res);
|
||||
compute_mark1(res);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
SASSERT(res);
|
||||
m_cache.insert(p, res);
|
||||
|
||||
if (m.has_fact(res) && m.is_false(m.get_fact(res))) { break; }
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
out = res;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// returns true if (hypothesis (not a)) would be reduced
|
||||
bool is_reduced(expr *a)
|
||||
{
|
||||
expr_ref e(m);
|
||||
if (m.is_not(a)) { e = to_app(a)->get_arg(0); }
|
||||
else { e = m.mk_not(a); }
|
||||
|
||||
return m_units.contains(e);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
proof *mk_lemma_core(proof *pf, expr *fact)
|
||||
{
|
||||
ptr_buffer<expr> args;
|
||||
expr_ref lemma(m);
|
||||
|
||||
if (m.is_or(fact)) {
|
||||
for (unsigned i = 0, sz = to_app(fact)->get_num_args(); i < sz; ++i) {
|
||||
expr *a = to_app(fact)->get_arg(i);
|
||||
if (!is_reduced(a))
|
||||
{ args.push_back(a); }
|
||||
}
|
||||
} else if (!is_reduced(fact))
|
||||
{ args.push_back(fact); }
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
if (args.size() == 0) { return pf; }
|
||||
else if (args.size() == 1) {
|
||||
lemma = args.get(0);
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
lemma = m.mk_or(args.size(), args.c_ptr());
|
||||
}
|
||||
proof* res = m.mk_lemma(pf, lemma);
|
||||
m_pinned.push_back(res);
|
||||
|
||||
if (m_hyps.contains(lemma))
|
||||
{ m_units.insert(lemma, res); }
|
||||
return res;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
proof *mk_unit_resolution_core(unsigned num_args, proof* const *args)
|
||||
{
|
||||
|
||||
ptr_buffer<proof> pf_args;
|
||||
pf_args.push_back(args [0]);
|
||||
|
||||
app *cls_fact = to_app(m.get_fact(args[0]));
|
||||
ptr_buffer<expr> cls;
|
||||
if (m.is_or(cls_fact)) {
|
||||
for (unsigned i = 0, sz = cls_fact->get_num_args(); i < sz; ++i)
|
||||
{ cls.push_back(cls_fact->get_arg(i)); }
|
||||
} else { cls.push_back(cls_fact); }
|
||||
|
||||
// construct new resovent
|
||||
ptr_buffer<expr> new_fact_cls;
|
||||
bool found;
|
||||
// XXX quadratic
|
||||
for (unsigned i = 0, sz = cls.size(); i < sz; ++i) {
|
||||
found = false;
|
||||
for (unsigned j = 1; j < num_args; ++j) {
|
||||
if (m.is_complement(cls.get(i), m.get_fact(args [j]))) {
|
||||
found = true;
|
||||
pf_args.push_back(args [j]);
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (!found) {
|
||||
new_fact_cls.push_back(cls.get(i));
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
SASSERT(new_fact_cls.size() + pf_args.size() - 1 == cls.size());
|
||||
expr_ref new_fact(m);
|
||||
new_fact = mk_or(m, new_fact_cls.size(), new_fact_cls.c_ptr());
|
||||
|
||||
// create new proof step
|
||||
proof *res = m.mk_unit_resolution(pf_args.size(), pf_args.c_ptr(), new_fact);
|
||||
m_pinned.push_back(res);
|
||||
return res;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// reduce all units, if any unit reduces to false return true and put its proof into out
|
||||
bool reduce_units(proof_ref &out)
|
||||
{
|
||||
proof_ref res(m);
|
||||
for (auto entry : m_units) {
|
||||
reduce(entry.get_value(), res);
|
||||
if (m.is_false(m.get_fact(res))) {
|
||||
out = res;
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
res.reset();
|
||||
}
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
public:
|
||||
reduce_hypotheses(ast_manager &m) : m(m), m_pinned(m) {}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
void operator()(proof_ref &pr)
|
||||
{
|
||||
compute_marks(pr);
|
||||
if (!reduce_units(pr)) {
|
||||
reduce(pr.get(), pr);
|
||||
}
|
||||
reset();
|
||||
}
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
void reduce_hypotheses(proof_ref &pr) {
|
||||
ast_manager &m = pr.get_manager();
|
||||
class reduce_hypotheses hypred(m);
|
||||
hypred(pr);
|
||||
DEBUG_CODE(proof_checker pc(m);
|
||||
expr_ref_vector side(m);
|
||||
SASSERT(pc.check(pr, side));
|
||||
);
|
||||
}
|
42
src/ast/proofs/proof_utils.h
Normal file
42
src/ast/proofs/proof_utils.h
Normal file
|
@ -0,0 +1,42 @@
|
|||
/*++
|
||||
Copyright (c) 2017 Arie Gurfinkel
|
||||
|
||||
Module Name:
|
||||
|
||||
proof_utils.h
|
||||
|
||||
Abstract:
|
||||
Utilities to traverse and manipulate proofs
|
||||
|
||||
Author:
|
||||
Bernhard Gleiss
|
||||
Arie Gurfinkel
|
||||
|
||||
Revision History:
|
||||
|
||||
--*/
|
||||
|
||||
#ifndef _PROOF_UTILS_H_
|
||||
#define _PROOF_UTILS_H_
|
||||
#include "ast/ast.h"
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* iterator, which traverses the proof in depth-first post-order.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
||||
class proof_post_order {
|
||||
public:
|
||||
proof_post_order(proof* refutation, ast_manager& manager);
|
||||
bool hasNext();
|
||||
proof* next();
|
||||
|
||||
private:
|
||||
ptr_vector<proof> m_todo;
|
||||
ast_mark m_visited; // the proof nodes we have already visited
|
||||
ast_manager& m;
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
void reduce_hypotheses(proof_ref &pr);
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
#endif
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue