3
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/Z3Prover/z3 synced 2025-04-22 16:45:31 +00:00

bailout for saturation lemmas

This commit is contained in:
Jakob Rath 2022-07-01 11:51:52 +02:00
parent c78007fd1a
commit d473c23e5b
5 changed files with 89 additions and 24 deletions

View file

@ -100,9 +100,6 @@ namespace polysat {
for (auto const& lit : cb)
out_indent() << lit << ": " << s.lit2cnstr(lit) << '\n';
out().flush();
// if (m_conflicts == 9)
// std::exit(0);
}
void end_conflict(search_state const& search, viable const& v) {
@ -197,7 +194,7 @@ namespace polysat {
m_var_occurrences.reset();
m_bail_vars.reset();
m_conflict_var = null_var;
m_bailout = false;
m_kind = conflict_kind_t::ok;
SASSERT(empty());
}
@ -345,12 +342,18 @@ namespace polysat {
return m_literals.contains(lit.index());
}
void conflict::set_bailout() {
SASSERT(!is_bailout());
m_bailout = true;
void conflict::set_bailout_gave_up() {
SASSERT(m_kind == conflict_kind_t::ok);
m_kind = conflict_kind_t::bailout_gave_up;
s.m_stats.m_num_bailouts++;
}
void conflict::set_bailout_lemma() {
SASSERT(m_kind == conflict_kind_t::ok);
m_kind = conflict_kind_t::bailout_lemma;
// s.m_stats.m_num_bailouts++;
}
struct inference_resolve : public inference {
sat::literal m_lit;
clause const& m_clause;
@ -487,6 +490,8 @@ namespace polysat {
SASSERT(v != conflict_var());
bool has_saturated = false;
auto const& j = s.m_justification[v];
if (j.is_decision() && m_bail_vars.contains(v))
@ -517,11 +522,20 @@ namespace polysat {
// TODO: as a last resort, substitute v by m_value[v]?
if (try_eliminate(v))
return true;
if (!try_saturate(v))
LOG("try-saturate v" << v);
if (try_saturate(v))
has_saturated = true;
else
break;
}
LOG("bailout v" << v);
set_bailout();
if (has_saturated) {
// NOTE: current saturation rules create valid lemmas that do not depend on the variable assignment
set_bailout_lemma();
return true;
}
else
set_bailout_gave_up();
bailout:
if (s.is_assigned(v) && j.is_decision())
m_vars.insert(v);

View file

@ -98,6 +98,12 @@ namespace polysat {
std::ostream& display(std::ostream& out) const override { return out << m_name; }
};
enum class conflict_kind_t {
ok,
bailout_gave_up,
bailout_lemma,
};
/** Conflict state, represented as core (~negation of clause). */
class conflict {
solver& s;
@ -106,13 +112,19 @@ namespace polysat {
uint_set m_vars; // variable assignments used as premises
uint_set m_bail_vars;
friend class inference_logger;
scoped_ptr<inference_logger> m_logger;
// If this is not null_var, the conflict was due to empty viable set for this variable.
// Can be treated like "v = x" for any value x.
pvar m_conflict_var = null_var;
/** Whether we are in a bailout state.
* We enter a bailout state when we give up on proper conflict resolution,
* or want to learn a lemma without fine-grained backtracking.
*/
conflict_kind_t m_kind = conflict_kind_t::ok;
friend class inference_logger;
scoped_ptr<inference_logger> m_logger;
bool_vector m_bvar2mark; // mark of Boolean variables
void set_mark(signed_constraint c);
@ -120,9 +132,6 @@ namespace polysat {
void minimize_vars(signed_constraint c);
/** Whether we are in a bailout state. We enter a bailout state when we give up on proper conflict resolution. */
bool m_bailout = false;
constraint_manager& cm() const;
scoped_ptr_vector<explainer> ex_engines;
scoped_ptr_vector<variable_elimination_engine> ve_engines;
@ -143,9 +152,10 @@ namespace polysat {
pvar conflict_var() const { return m_conflict_var; }
bool is_bailout() const { return m_bailout; }
void set_bailout();
bool is_bailout() const { return m_kind != conflict_kind_t::ok; }
bool is_bailout_lemma() const { return m_kind == conflict_kind_t::bailout_lemma; }
void set_bailout_gave_up();
void set_bailout_lemma();
bool empty() const;
void reset();

View file

@ -73,6 +73,7 @@ namespace polysat {
LOG("consequent " << c << " value: " << c.bvalue(s) << " is-false: " << c.is_currently_false(s) << " " << core.contains(~c));
// ensure new core is a conflict
// TODO: don't we need to check the m_new_constraints too? or maybe that is implicit in the rules (should check it)
if (!c.is_currently_false(s) && c.bvalue(s) != l_false)
return false;
@ -99,7 +100,7 @@ namespace polysat {
core.reset();
for (auto d : m_new_constraints)
core.insert(d);
if (c.bvalue(s) != l_false)
if (c.bvalue(s) != l_false) // conflict is due to the evaluation of c, so it depends on the variable values
core.insert_vars(c);
core.insert(~c);
core.log_inference(inf_name);

View file

@ -27,8 +27,6 @@ Author:
namespace polysat {
solver::solver(reslimit& lim):
m_lim(lim),
m_viable(*this),
@ -93,7 +91,6 @@ namespace polysat {
return check_sat();
}
dd::pdd_manager& solver::sz2pdd(unsigned sz) const {
m_pdd.reserve(sz + 1);
if (!m_pdd[sz])
@ -643,6 +640,11 @@ namespace polysat {
revert_decision(v);
return;
}
if (m_conflict.is_bailout_lemma()) {
m_conflict.end_conflict();
backtrack_lemma();
return;
}
m_search.pop_assignment();
}
else {
@ -677,7 +679,44 @@ namespace polysat {
}
/**
* Simpler backracking for forbidden interval lemmas:
* Simple backtracking for lemmas:
* jump to the level where the lemma can be (bool-)propagated,
* even without reverting the last decision.
*/
void solver::backtrack_lemma() {
clause_ref lemma = m_conflict.build_lemma().build();
LOG_H2("backtrack_lemma: " << show_deref(lemma));
SASSERT(lemma);
// find second-highest level of the literals in the lemma
unsigned max_level = 0; // could be simplified if we're sure that always max_level == m_level
unsigned jump_level = 0;
for (auto lit : *lemma) {
if (!m_bvars.is_assigned(lit))
continue;
unsigned lit_level = m_bvars.level(lit);
if (lit_level > max_level) {
jump_level = max_level;
max_level = lit_level;
} else if (max_level > lit_level && lit_level > jump_level) {
jump_level = lit_level;
}
}
jump_level = std::max(jump_level, base_level());
// LOG("current lvl: " << m_level);
// LOG("base level: " << base_level());
// LOG("max_level: " << max_level);
// LOG("jump_level: " << jump_level);
m_conflict.reset();
backjump(jump_level);
learn_lemma(*lemma);
}
/**
* Simpler backtracking for forbidden interval lemmas:
* since forbidden intervals already gives us a lemma where the conflict variable has been eliminated,
* we can backtrack to the last relevant decision and learn this lemma.
*/
@ -914,7 +953,7 @@ namespace polysat {
LOG_H3("Reverting boolean decision: " << lit << " " << m_conflict);
SASSERT(m_bvars.is_decision(var));
clause_builder reason_builder = m_conflict.build_lemma();
clause_builder reason_builder = m_conflict.build_lemma();
SASSERT(std::find(reason_builder.begin(), reason_builder.end(), ~lit));
clause_ref reason = reason_builder.build();

View file

@ -205,6 +205,7 @@ namespace polysat {
void resolve_conflict();
void backtrack_fi();
void backtrack_lemma();
void revert_decision(pvar v);
void revert_bool_decision(sat::literal lit);