mirror of
https://github.com/Z3Prover/z3
synced 2025-04-10 19:27:06 +00:00
add facility to add lemmas
Signed-off-by: Nikolaj Bjorner <nbjorner@microsoft.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
af6ebbcd92
commit
ce592d7716
|
@ -258,6 +258,16 @@ extern "C" {
|
|||
to_solver_ref(s)->assert_expr(to_expr(a), to_expr(p));
|
||||
Z3_CATCH;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
void Z3_API Z3_solver_assert_lemma(Z3_context c, Z3_solver s, Z3_ast a) {
|
||||
Z3_TRY;
|
||||
LOG_Z3_solver_assert_lemma(c, s, a);
|
||||
RESET_ERROR_CODE();
|
||||
init_solver(c, s);
|
||||
CHECK_FORMULA(a,);
|
||||
to_solver_ref(s)->assert_lemma(to_expr(a));
|
||||
Z3_CATCH;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
Z3_ast_vector Z3_API Z3_solver_get_assertions(Z3_context c, Z3_solver s) {
|
||||
Z3_TRY;
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -181,6 +181,21 @@ namespace Microsoft.Z3
|
|||
Native.Z3_solver_assert_and_track(Context.nCtx, NativeObject, constraint.NativeObject, p.NativeObject);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// <summary>
|
||||
/// Assert a lemma (or multiple) into the solver.
|
||||
/// </summary>
|
||||
public void AssertLemma(params BoolExpr[] constraints)
|
||||
{
|
||||
Contract.Requires(constraints != null);
|
||||
Contract.Requires(Contract.ForAll(constraints, c => c != null));
|
||||
|
||||
Context.CheckContextMatch<BoolExpr>(constraints);
|
||||
foreach (BoolExpr a in constraints)
|
||||
{
|
||||
Native.Z3_solver_assert_lemma(Context.nCtx, NativeObject, a.NativeObject);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// <summary>
|
||||
/// The number of assertions in the solver.
|
||||
/// </summary>
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -5949,6 +5949,16 @@ extern "C" {
|
|||
*/
|
||||
void Z3_API Z3_solver_assert_and_track(Z3_context c, Z3_solver s, Z3_ast a, Z3_ast p);
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
\brief add a lemma. A lemma is a assumed to be a consequence of the current assertions.
|
||||
Adding a lemma should therefore be a logical no-op. Solvers are free to ignore lemmas.
|
||||
|
||||
\pre \c a must be a Boolean expression
|
||||
|
||||
def_API('Z3_solver_assert_lemma', VOID, (_in(CONTEXT), _in(SOLVER), _in(AST)))
|
||||
*/
|
||||
void Z3_API Z3_solver_assert_lemma(Z3_context c, Z3_solver s, Z3_ast a);
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
\brief Return the set of asserted formulas on the solver.
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -92,6 +92,7 @@ namespace opt {
|
|||
virtual void collect_param_descrs(param_descrs & r);
|
||||
virtual void collect_statistics(statistics & st) const;
|
||||
virtual void assert_expr(expr * t);
|
||||
virtual void assert_lemma(expr* t) {}
|
||||
virtual void push_core();
|
||||
virtual void pop_core(unsigned n);
|
||||
virtual lbool check_sat_core(unsigned num_assumptions, expr * const * assumptions);
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -209,7 +209,7 @@ namespace sat {
|
|||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
void solver::mk_clause(unsigned num_lits, literal * lits) {
|
||||
void solver::mk_clause(unsigned num_lits, literal * lits, bool learned) {
|
||||
m_model_is_current = false;
|
||||
DEBUG_CODE({
|
||||
for (unsigned i = 0; i < num_lits; i++)
|
||||
|
@ -217,24 +217,24 @@ namespace sat {
|
|||
});
|
||||
|
||||
if (m_user_scope_literals.empty()) {
|
||||
mk_clause_core(num_lits, lits, false);
|
||||
mk_clause_core(num_lits, lits, learned);
|
||||
}
|
||||
else {
|
||||
m_aux_literals.reset();
|
||||
m_aux_literals.append(num_lits, lits);
|
||||
m_aux_literals.append(m_user_scope_literals);
|
||||
mk_clause_core(m_aux_literals.size(), m_aux_literals.c_ptr(), false);
|
||||
mk_clause_core(m_aux_literals.size(), m_aux_literals.c_ptr(), learned);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
void solver::mk_clause(literal l1, literal l2) {
|
||||
void solver::mk_clause(literal l1, literal l2, bool learned) {
|
||||
literal ls[2] = { l1, l2 };
|
||||
mk_clause(2, ls);
|
||||
mk_clause(2, ls, learned);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
void solver::mk_clause(literal l1, literal l2, literal l3) {
|
||||
void solver::mk_clause(literal l1, literal l2, literal l3, bool learned) {
|
||||
literal ls[3] = { l1, l2, l3 };
|
||||
mk_clause(3, ls);
|
||||
mk_clause(3, ls, learned);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
void solver::del_clause(clause& c) {
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -203,10 +203,10 @@ namespace sat {
|
|||
//
|
||||
// -----------------------
|
||||
bool_var mk_var(bool ext = false, bool dvar = true);
|
||||
void mk_clause(literal_vector const& lits) { mk_clause(lits.size(), lits.c_ptr()); }
|
||||
void mk_clause(unsigned num_lits, literal * lits);
|
||||
void mk_clause(literal l1, literal l2);
|
||||
void mk_clause(literal l1, literal l2, literal l3);
|
||||
void mk_clause(literal_vector const& lits, bool learned = false) { mk_clause(lits.size(), lits.c_ptr(), learned); }
|
||||
void mk_clause(unsigned num_lits, literal * lits, bool learned = false);
|
||||
void mk_clause(literal l1, literal l2, bool learned = false);
|
||||
void mk_clause(literal l1, literal l2, literal l3, bool learned = false);
|
||||
|
||||
protected:
|
||||
void del_clause(clause & c);
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -241,6 +241,16 @@ public:
|
|||
assert_expr(t);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
virtual void assert_lemma(expr* e) {
|
||||
dep2asm_t dep2asm;
|
||||
goal_ref g = alloc(goal, m, true, false); // models, maybe cores are enabled
|
||||
for (unsigned i = m_fmls_head ; i < m_fmls.size(); ++i) {
|
||||
g->assert_expr(m_fmls[i].get());
|
||||
}
|
||||
VERIFY(l_undef != internalize_goal(g, dep2asm, true));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
virtual ast_manager& get_manager() const { return m; }
|
||||
virtual void assert_expr(expr * t) {
|
||||
m_internalized = false;
|
||||
|
@ -501,7 +511,7 @@ public:
|
|||
private:
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
lbool internalize_goal(goal_ref& g, dep2asm_t& dep2asm) {
|
||||
lbool internalize_goal(goal_ref& g, dep2asm_t& dep2asm, bool is_lemma) {
|
||||
m_mc.reset();
|
||||
m_pc.reset();
|
||||
m_dep_core.reset();
|
||||
|
@ -527,7 +537,7 @@ private:
|
|||
g = m_subgoals[0];
|
||||
expr_ref_vector atoms(m);
|
||||
TRACE("sat", g->display_with_dependencies(tout););
|
||||
m_goal2sat(*g, m_params, m_solver, m_map, dep2asm, true);
|
||||
m_goal2sat(*g, m_params, m_solver, m_map, dep2asm, true, is_lemma);
|
||||
m_goal2sat.get_interpreted_atoms(atoms);
|
||||
if (!atoms.empty()) {
|
||||
std::stringstream strm;
|
||||
|
@ -552,7 +562,7 @@ private:
|
|||
for (unsigned i = 0; i < get_num_assumptions(); ++i) {
|
||||
g->assert_expr(get_assumption(i), m.mk_leaf(get_assumption(i)));
|
||||
}
|
||||
lbool res = internalize_goal(g, dep2asm);
|
||||
lbool res = internalize_goal(g, dep2asm, false);
|
||||
if (res == l_true) {
|
||||
extract_assumptions(sz, asms, dep2asm);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -673,7 +683,7 @@ private:
|
|||
for (unsigned i = m_fmls_head ; i < m_fmls.size(); ++i) {
|
||||
g->assert_expr(m_fmls[i].get());
|
||||
}
|
||||
lbool res = internalize_goal(g, dep2asm);
|
||||
lbool res = internalize_goal(g, dep2asm, false);
|
||||
if (res != l_undef) {
|
||||
m_fmls_head = m_fmls.size();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -67,6 +67,7 @@ struct goal2sat::imp {
|
|||
expr_ref_vector m_interpreted_atoms;
|
||||
bool m_default_external;
|
||||
bool m_xor_solver;
|
||||
bool m_is_lemma;
|
||||
|
||||
imp(ast_manager & _m, params_ref const & p, sat::solver & s, atom2bool_var & map, dep2asm_map& dep2asm, bool default_external):
|
||||
m(_m),
|
||||
|
@ -77,7 +78,8 @@ struct goal2sat::imp {
|
|||
m_dep2asm(dep2asm),
|
||||
m_trail(m),
|
||||
m_interpreted_atoms(m),
|
||||
m_default_external(default_external) {
|
||||
m_default_external(default_external),
|
||||
m_is_lemma(false) {
|
||||
updt_params(p);
|
||||
m_true = sat::null_bool_var;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -98,19 +100,21 @@ struct goal2sat::imp {
|
|||
m_solver.mk_clause(1, &l);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
void set_lemma_mode(bool f) { m_is_lemma = f; }
|
||||
|
||||
void mk_clause(sat::literal l1, sat::literal l2) {
|
||||
TRACE("goal2sat", tout << "mk_clause: " << l1 << " " << l2 << "\n";);
|
||||
m_solver.mk_clause(l1, l2);
|
||||
m_solver.mk_clause(l1, l2, m_is_lemma);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
void mk_clause(sat::literal l1, sat::literal l2, sat::literal l3) {
|
||||
TRACE("goal2sat", tout << "mk_clause: " << l1 << " " << l2 << " " << l3 << "\n";);
|
||||
m_solver.mk_clause(l1, l2, l3);
|
||||
m_solver.mk_clause(l1, l2, l3, m_is_lemma);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
void mk_clause(unsigned num, sat::literal * lits) {
|
||||
TRACE("goal2sat", tout << "mk_clause: "; for (unsigned i = 0; i < num; i++) tout << lits[i] << " "; tout << "\n";);
|
||||
m_solver.mk_clause(num, lits);
|
||||
m_solver.mk_clause(num, lits, m_is_lemma);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
sat::bool_var mk_true() {
|
||||
|
@ -863,9 +867,10 @@ struct goal2sat::scoped_set_imp {
|
|||
};
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
void goal2sat::operator()(goal const & g, params_ref const & p, sat::solver & t, atom2bool_var & m, dep2asm_map& dep2asm, bool default_external) {
|
||||
void goal2sat::operator()(goal const & g, params_ref const & p, sat::solver & t, atom2bool_var & m, dep2asm_map& dep2asm, bool default_external, bool is_lemma) {
|
||||
imp proc(g.m(), p, t, m, dep2asm, default_external);
|
||||
scoped_set_imp set(this, &proc);
|
||||
proc.set_lemma_mode(is_lemma);
|
||||
proc(g);
|
||||
dealloc(m_interpreted_atoms);
|
||||
m_interpreted_atoms = alloc(expr_ref_vector, g.m());
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -50,6 +50,7 @@ public:
|
|||
|
||||
static bool has_unsupported_bool(goal const & s);
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
\brief "Compile" the goal into the given sat solver.
|
||||
Store a mapping from atoms to boolean variables into m.
|
||||
|
@ -60,7 +61,7 @@ public:
|
|||
\warning conversion throws a tactic_exception, if it is interrupted (by set_cancel),
|
||||
an unsupported operator is found, or memory consumption limit is reached (set with param :max-memory).
|
||||
*/
|
||||
void operator()(goal const & g, params_ref const & p, sat::solver & t, atom2bool_var & m, dep2asm_map& dep2asm, bool default_external = false);
|
||||
void operator()(goal const & g, params_ref const & p, sat::solver & t, atom2bool_var & m, dep2asm_map& dep2asm, bool default_external = false, bool is_lemma = false);
|
||||
|
||||
void get_interpreted_atoms(expr_ref_vector& atoms);
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -116,6 +116,10 @@ namespace smt {
|
|||
m_name2assertion.insert(a, t);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
virtual void assert_lemma(expr* t) {
|
||||
// no-op
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
virtual void push_core() {
|
||||
m_context.push();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -179,6 +179,12 @@ public:
|
|||
m_solver2->assert_expr(t, a);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
virtual void assert_lemma(expr* t) {
|
||||
m_solver1->assert_lemma(t);
|
||||
if (m_solver2_initialized)
|
||||
m_solver2->assert_lemma(t);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
virtual void push() {
|
||||
switch_inc_mode();
|
||||
m_solver1->push();
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -90,6 +90,12 @@ public:
|
|||
*/
|
||||
virtual void assert_expr(expr * t, expr * a) = 0;
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
\brief Add a lemma to the assertion stack. A lemma is assumed to be a consequence of already
|
||||
asserted formulas. The solver is free to ignore lemmas.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
virtual void assert_lemma(expr * t) = 0;
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
\brief Create a backtracking point.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -55,6 +55,7 @@ public:
|
|||
virtual void set_produce_models(bool f) { m_produce_models = f; }
|
||||
|
||||
virtual void assert_expr(expr * t);
|
||||
virtual void assert_lemma(expr * t);
|
||||
|
||||
virtual void push_core();
|
||||
virtual void pop_core(unsigned n);
|
||||
|
@ -115,6 +116,9 @@ void tactic2solver::assert_expr(expr * t) {
|
|||
m_result = 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
void tactic2solver::assert_lemma(expr * t) {
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
void tactic2solver::push_core() {
|
||||
m_scopes.push_back(m_assertions.size());
|
||||
m_result = 0;
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -93,6 +93,10 @@ public:
|
|||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
virtual void assert_lemma(expr * t) {
|
||||
m_solver->assert_lemma(t);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
virtual void push_core() {
|
||||
flush_assertions();
|
||||
m_solver->push();
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -64,6 +64,16 @@ public:
|
|||
m_solver->assert_expr(bounds);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
virtual void assert_lemma(expr* t) {
|
||||
expr_ref tmp(t, m);
|
||||
expr_ref_vector bounds(m);
|
||||
proof_ref tmp_proof(m);
|
||||
m_rewriter(t, tmp, tmp_proof);
|
||||
m_solver->assert_lemma(tmp);
|
||||
m_rewriter.flush_side_constraints(bounds);
|
||||
m_solver->assert_expr(bounds);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
virtual void push_core() {
|
||||
m_rewriter.push();
|
||||
m_solver->push();
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -56,6 +56,10 @@ public:
|
|||
m_assertions.push_back(t);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
virtual void assert_lemma(expr * t) {
|
||||
m_solver->assert_lemma(t);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
virtual void push_core() {
|
||||
flush_assertions();
|
||||
m_rewriter.push();
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue