mirror of
https://github.com/Z3Prover/z3
synced 2025-04-25 01:55:32 +00:00
more on saturation
Signed-off-by: Nikolaj Bjorner <nbjorner@microsoft.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
58276e2569
commit
c7129d2537
2 changed files with 92 additions and 54 deletions
|
@ -101,18 +101,29 @@ namespace polysat {
|
|||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
// TODO: needs to be justified by the reason lemma that is created on the fly.
|
||||
void inf_saturate::push_l(conflict_core& core, unsigned lvl, bool is_strict, pdd const& lhs, pdd const& rhs) {
|
||||
signed_constraint inf_saturate::ineq(unsigned lvl, bool is_strict, pdd const& lhs, pdd const& rhs) {
|
||||
if (is_strict)
|
||||
core.insert(s().m_constraints.ult(lvl, lhs, rhs));
|
||||
return s().m_constraints.ult(lvl, lhs, rhs);
|
||||
else
|
||||
core.insert(s().m_constraints.ule(lvl, lhs, rhs));
|
||||
return s().m_constraints.ule(lvl, lhs, rhs);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
void inf_saturate::push_c(conflict_core& core, signed_constraint const& c, clause_builder& reason) {
|
||||
core.insert(c);
|
||||
clause_ref lemma = reason.build();
|
||||
s().add_lemma(lemma);
|
||||
s().propagate_bool(c.blit(), lemma.get());
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
void inf_saturate::push_l(conflict_core& core, unsigned lvl, bool is_strict, pdd const& lhs, pdd const& rhs, clause_builder& reason) {
|
||||
signed_constraint c = ineq(lvl, is_strict, lhs, rhs);
|
||||
push_c(core, c, reason);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// Add Ω*(x, y) to the conflict state.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// @param[in] p bit width
|
||||
bool inf_saturate::push_omega_mul(conflict_core& core, unsigned level, pdd const& x, pdd const& y) {
|
||||
bool inf_saturate::push_omega_mul(conflict_core& core, clause_builder & reason, unsigned level, pdd const& x, pdd const& y) {
|
||||
LOG_H3("Omega^*(x, y)");
|
||||
LOG("x = " << x);
|
||||
LOG("y = " << y);
|
||||
|
@ -123,20 +134,22 @@ namespace polysat {
|
|||
unsigned k = p / 2;
|
||||
|
||||
rational x_val;
|
||||
if (s().try_eval(x, x_val)) {
|
||||
unsigned x_bits = x_val.bitsize();
|
||||
LOG("eval x: " << x << " := " << x_val << " (x_bits: " << x_bits << ")");
|
||||
SASSERT(x_val < rational::power_of_two(x_bits));
|
||||
min_k = x_bits;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (!s().try_eval(x, x_val))
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
|
||||
rational y_val;
|
||||
if (s().try_eval(y, y_val)) {
|
||||
unsigned y_bits = y_val.bitsize();
|
||||
LOG("eval y: " << y << " := " << y_val << " (y_bits: " << y_bits << ")");
|
||||
SASSERT(y_val < rational::power_of_two(y_bits));
|
||||
max_k = p - y_bits;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (!s().try_eval(y, y_val))
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
|
||||
unsigned x_bits = x_val.bitsize();
|
||||
LOG("eval x: " << x << " := " << x_val << " (x_bits: " << x_bits << ")");
|
||||
SASSERT(x_val < rational::power_of_two(x_bits));
|
||||
min_k = x_bits;
|
||||
|
||||
unsigned y_bits = y_val.bitsize();
|
||||
LOG("eval y: " << y << " := " << y_val << " (y_bits: " << y_bits << ")");
|
||||
SASSERT(y_val < rational::power_of_two(y_bits));
|
||||
max_k = p - y_bits;
|
||||
|
||||
if (min_k > max_k) {
|
||||
// In this case, we cannot choose k such that both literals are false.
|
||||
|
@ -153,17 +166,30 @@ namespace polysat {
|
|||
else
|
||||
k = min_k;
|
||||
|
||||
LOG("k = " << k << "; min_k = " << min_k << "; max_k = " << max_k << "; p = " << p);
|
||||
SASSERT(min_k <= k && k <= max_k);
|
||||
|
||||
// x >= 2^k
|
||||
auto c1 = s().m_constraints.ule(level, pddm.mk_val(rational::power_of_two(k)), x);
|
||||
// y > 2^{p-k}
|
||||
auto c2 = s().m_constraints.ult(level, pddm.mk_val(rational::power_of_two(p - k)), y);
|
||||
// x < 2^k
|
||||
auto c1 = s().m_constraints.ult(level, x, pddm.mk_val(rational::power_of_two(k)));
|
||||
// y <= 2^{p-k}
|
||||
auto c2 = s().m_constraints.ule(level, y, pddm.mk_val(rational::power_of_two(p - k)));
|
||||
|
||||
// TODO: these need to be justified as well.
|
||||
core.insert(~c1);
|
||||
core.insert(~c2);
|
||||
// bail-out explanation uses equality constraint based on current assignment to variables.
|
||||
// TODO: extract stronger explanations.
|
||||
// for example if they appear already in Gamma
|
||||
// or if some strengthening appears in gamma
|
||||
// or using the current value assignment
|
||||
|
||||
clause_builder bound(s());
|
||||
bound.push(s().m_constraints.eq(level, x - pddm.mk_val(x_val)));
|
||||
push_c(core, c1, bound);
|
||||
bound.reset();
|
||||
|
||||
bound.push(s().m_constraints.eq(level, y - pddm.mk_val(y_val)));
|
||||
push_c(core, c2, bound);
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
reason.push(c1);
|
||||
reason.push(c2);
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -186,7 +212,7 @@ namespace polysat {
|
|||
*/
|
||||
bool inf_saturate::is_Y_l_Ax(pvar x, inequality const& d, pdd& a, pdd& y) {
|
||||
y = d.lhs;
|
||||
return d.rhs.degree(x) == 1 && d.rhs.factor(x, 1, a);
|
||||
return is_xY(x, d.rhs, a);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
bool inf_saturate::verify_Y_l_Ax(pvar x, inequality const& d, pdd const& a, pdd const& y) {
|
||||
|
@ -197,10 +223,7 @@ namespace polysat {
|
|||
* Match [v] v*x <= z*x
|
||||
*/
|
||||
bool inf_saturate::is_Xy_l_XZ(pvar v, inequality const& c, pdd& x, pdd& z) {
|
||||
if (c.lhs.degree(v) != 1)
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
|
||||
if (!c.lhs.factor(v, 1, x))
|
||||
if (!is_xY(v, c.lhs, x))
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
|
||||
// TODO: in principle, 'x' could be any polynomial. However, we need to divide the lhs by x, and we don't have general polynomial division yet.
|
||||
|
@ -227,9 +250,7 @@ namespace polysat {
|
|||
* Match [z] yx <= zx
|
||||
*/
|
||||
bool inf_saturate::is_YX_l_zX(pvar z, inequality const& c, pdd& x, pdd& y) {
|
||||
if (c.rhs.degree(z) != 1)
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
if (!c.rhs.factor(z, 1, x))
|
||||
if (!is_xY(z, c.rhs, x))
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
// TODO: in principle, 'x' could be any polynomial. However, we need to divide the lhs by x, and we don't have general polynomial division yet.
|
||||
// so for now we just allow the form 'value*variable'.
|
||||
|
@ -247,31 +268,39 @@ namespace polysat {
|
|||
return c.lhs == y * x && c.rhs == s().var(z) * x;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* Match [x] xY <= xZ
|
||||
*/
|
||||
bool inf_saturate::is_xY_l_xZ(pvar x, inequality const& c, pdd& y, pdd& z) {
|
||||
return is_xY(x, c.lhs, y) && is_xY(x, c.rhs, z);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* Match xy = x * Y
|
||||
*/
|
||||
bool inf_saturate::is_xY(pvar x, pdd const& xy, pdd& y) {
|
||||
return xy.degree(x) == 1 && xy.factor(x, 1, y);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* Implement the inferences
|
||||
* [x] zx > yx ==> Ω*(x,y) \/ z > y
|
||||
* [x] yx <= zx ==> Ω*(x,y) \/ y <= z
|
||||
*/
|
||||
bool inf_saturate::try_ugt_x(pvar v, conflict_core& core, inequality const& c) {
|
||||
if (c.lhs.degree(v) != 1)
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
if (c.rhs.degree(v) != 1)
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
pdd const x = s().var(v);
|
||||
|
||||
pdd x = s().var(v);
|
||||
pdd y = x;
|
||||
if (!c.lhs.factor(v, 1, y))
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
pdd z = x;
|
||||
if (!c.rhs.factor(v, 1, z))
|
||||
if (!is_xY_l_xZ(v, c, y, z))
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
|
||||
unsigned const lvl = c.src->level();
|
||||
|
||||
clause_builder reason(s());
|
||||
// Omega^*(x, y)
|
||||
if (!push_omega_mul(core, lvl, x, y))
|
||||
if (!push_omega_mul(core, reason, lvl, x, y))
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
push_l(core, lvl, c.is_strict, y, z);
|
||||
push_l(core, lvl, c.is_strict, y, z, reason);
|
||||
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -288,12 +317,13 @@ namespace polysat {
|
|||
unsigned const lvl = std::max(yx_l_zx.src->level(), le_y.src->level());
|
||||
pdd const& z_prime = le_y.lhs;
|
||||
|
||||
clause_builder reason(s());
|
||||
// Omega^*(x, y)
|
||||
if (!push_omega_mul(core, lvl, x, y))
|
||||
if (!push_omega_mul(core, reason, lvl, x, y))
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
|
||||
// z'x <= zx
|
||||
push_l(core, lvl, yx_l_zx.is_strict || le_y.is_strict, z_prime * x, z * x);
|
||||
push_l(core, lvl, yx_l_zx.is_strict || le_y.is_strict, z_prime * x, z * x, reason);
|
||||
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -334,9 +364,10 @@ namespace polysat {
|
|||
SASSERT(verify_Y_l_Ax(x, y_l_ax, a, y));
|
||||
pdd z = x_l_z.rhs;
|
||||
unsigned const lvl = std::max(x_l_z.src->level(), y_l_ax.src->level());
|
||||
if (!push_omega_mul(core, lvl, a, z))
|
||||
clause_builder reason(s());
|
||||
if (!push_omega_mul(core, reason, lvl, a, z))
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
push_l(core, lvl, x_l_z.is_strict || y_l_ax.is_strict, y, a * z);
|
||||
push_l(core, lvl, x_l_z.is_strict || y_l_ax.is_strict, y, a * z, reason);
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -360,15 +391,14 @@ namespace polysat {
|
|||
bool inf_saturate::try_ugt_z(pvar z, conflict_core& core, inequality const& c, inequality const& d, pdd const& x, pdd const& y) {
|
||||
SASSERT(is_g_v(z, c));
|
||||
SASSERT(verify_YX_l_zX(z, d, x, y));
|
||||
|
||||
unsigned const lvl = std::max(c.src->level(), d.src->level());
|
||||
pdd const& y_prime = c.rhs;
|
||||
|
||||
clause_builder reason(s());
|
||||
// Omega^*(x, y')
|
||||
if (!push_omega_mul(core, lvl, x, y_prime))
|
||||
if (!push_omega_mul(core, reason, lvl, x, y_prime))
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
// yx <= y'x
|
||||
push_l(core, lvl, c.is_strict || d.is_strict, y * x, y_prime * x);
|
||||
push_l(core, lvl, c.is_strict || d.is_strict, y * x, y_prime * x, reason);
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -41,8 +41,10 @@ namespace polysat {
|
|||
};
|
||||
|
||||
class inf_saturate : public inference_engine {
|
||||
bool push_omega_mul(conflict_core& core, unsigned level, pdd const& x, pdd const& y);
|
||||
void push_l(conflict_core& core, unsigned level, bool strict, pdd const& lhs, pdd const& rhs);
|
||||
bool push_omega_mul(conflict_core& core, clause_builder& reason, unsigned level, pdd const& x, pdd const& y);
|
||||
signed_constraint ineq(unsigned level, bool strict, pdd const& lhs, pdd const& rhs);
|
||||
void push_c(conflict_core& core, signed_constraint const& c, clause_builder& reason);
|
||||
void push_l(conflict_core& core, unsigned level, bool strict, pdd const& lhs, pdd const& rhs, clause_builder& reason);
|
||||
|
||||
bool try_ugt_x(pvar v, conflict_core& core, inequality const& c);
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -74,6 +76,12 @@ namespace polysat {
|
|||
bool is_YX_l_zX(pvar z, inequality const& c, pdd& x, pdd& y);
|
||||
bool verify_YX_l_zX(pvar z, inequality const& c, pdd const& x, pdd const& y);
|
||||
|
||||
// c := xY <= xZ
|
||||
bool is_xY_l_xZ(pvar x, inequality const& c, pdd& y, pdd& z);
|
||||
|
||||
// xy := x * Y
|
||||
bool is_xY(pvar x, pdd const& xy, pdd& y);
|
||||
|
||||
public:
|
||||
|
||||
bool perform(pvar v, conflict_core& core) override;
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue