3
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/Z3Prover/z3 synced 2025-04-28 19:35:50 +00:00

proof format

Signed-off-by: Nikolaj Bjorner <nbjorner@microsoft.com>
This commit is contained in:
Nikolaj Bjorner 2022-06-06 07:18:33 -07:00
parent ea365de820
commit b629960afb
8 changed files with 144 additions and 62 deletions

View file

@ -80,6 +80,33 @@ namespace arith {
if (m_nla) m_nla->collect_statistics(st);
}
void solver::add_assumptions() {
m_arith_hint.reset();
unsigned i = 0;
for (auto const & ev : m_explanation) {
++i;
auto idx = ev.ci();
if (UINT_MAX == idx)
continue;
switch (m_constraint_sources[idx]) {
case inequality_source: {
literal lit = m_inequalities[idx];
m_arith_hint.m_literals.push_back({ev.coeff(), lit});
break;
}
case equality_source: {
auto [u, v] = m_equalities[idx];
ctx.drat_log_expr(u->get_expr());
ctx.drat_log_expr(v->get_expr());
m_arith_hint.m_eqs.push_back({u->get_expr_id(), v->get_expr_id()});
break;
}
default:
break;
}
}
}
/**
* It may be necessary to use the following assumption when checking Farkas claims
* generated from bounds propagation:
@ -91,34 +118,19 @@ namespace arith {
sat::proof_hint const* solver::explain(sat::hint_type ty, sat::literal lit) {
if (!ctx.use_drat())
return nullptr;
m_bounds_pragma.m_ty = ty;
m_bounds_pragma.m_literals.reset();
m_bounds_pragma.m_eqs.reset();
unsigned i = 0;
for (auto const & ev : m_explanation) {
++i;
auto idx = ev.ci();
if (UINT_MAX == idx)
continue;
switch (m_constraint_sources[idx]) {
case inequality_source: {
literal lit = m_inequalities[idx];
m_bounds_pragma.m_literals.push_back({ev.coeff(), lit});
break;
}
case equality_source: {
auto [u, v] = m_equalities[idx];
ctx.drat_log_expr(u->get_expr());
ctx.drat_log_expr(v->get_expr());
m_bounds_pragma.m_eqs.push_back({ev.coeff(), u->get_expr_id(), v->get_expr_id()});
break;
}
default:
break;
}
}
m_arith_hint.m_ty = ty;
add_assumptions();
if (lit != sat::null_literal)
m_bounds_pragma.m_literals.push_back({rational(1), ~lit});
return &m_bounds_pragma;
m_arith_hint.m_literals.push_back({rational(1), ~lit});
return &m_arith_hint;
}
sat::proof_hint const* solver::explain_implied_eq(euf::enode* a, euf::enode* b) {
if (!ctx.use_drat())
return nullptr;
m_arith_hint.m_ty = sat::hint_type::implied_eq_h;
add_assumptions();
m_arith_hint.m_diseqs.push_back({a->get_expr_id(), b->get_expr_id()});
return &m_arith_hint;
}
}