mirror of
https://github.com/Z3Prover/z3
synced 2025-04-10 19:27:06 +00:00
working on duality
This commit is contained in:
parent
a93f8b04e5
commit
a3462ba6aa
|
@ -142,6 +142,7 @@ namespace Duality {
|
|||
context *ctx; /** Z3 context for formulas */
|
||||
solver *slvr; /** Z3 solver */
|
||||
bool need_goals; /** Can the solver use the goal tree to optimize interpolants? */
|
||||
solver aux_solver; /** For temporary use -- don't leave assertions here. */
|
||||
|
||||
/** Tree interpolation. This method assumes the formulas in TermTree
|
||||
"assumptions" are currently asserted in the solver. The return
|
||||
|
@ -178,6 +179,8 @@ namespace Duality {
|
|||
/** Cancel, throw Canceled object if possible. */
|
||||
virtual void cancel(){ }
|
||||
|
||||
LogicSolver(context &c) : aux_solver(c){}
|
||||
|
||||
virtual ~LogicSolver(){}
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -215,7 +218,7 @@ namespace Duality {
|
|||
}
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
iZ3LogicSolver(context &c){
|
||||
iZ3LogicSolver(context &c) : LogicSolver(c) {
|
||||
ctx = ictx = &c;
|
||||
slvr = islvr = new interpolating_solver(*ictx);
|
||||
need_goals = false;
|
||||
|
@ -287,9 +290,9 @@ namespace Duality {
|
|||
literals dualLabels;
|
||||
std::list<stack_entry> stack;
|
||||
std::vector<Term> axioms; // only saved here for printing purposes
|
||||
solver aux_solver;
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
solver &aux_solver;
|
||||
hash_set<ast> *proof_core;
|
||||
|
||||
public:
|
||||
|
||||
/** Construct an RPFP graph with a given interpolating prover context. It is allowed to
|
||||
|
@ -299,13 +302,14 @@ namespace Duality {
|
|||
inherit the axioms.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
||||
RPFP(LogicSolver *_ls) : Z3User(*(_ls->ctx), *(_ls->slvr)), dualModel(*(_ls->ctx)), aux_solver(*(_ls->ctx))
|
||||
RPFP(LogicSolver *_ls) : Z3User(*(_ls->ctx), *(_ls->slvr)), dualModel(*(_ls->ctx)), aux_solver(_ls->aux_solver)
|
||||
{
|
||||
ls = _ls;
|
||||
nodeCount = 0;
|
||||
edgeCount = 0;
|
||||
stack.push_back(stack_entry());
|
||||
HornClauses = false;
|
||||
proof_core = 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
~RPFP();
|
||||
|
@ -606,9 +610,13 @@ namespace Duality {
|
|||
|
||||
lbool Solve(Node *root, int persist);
|
||||
|
||||
/** Same as Solve, but annotates only a single node. */
|
||||
|
||||
lbool SolveSingleNode(Node *root, Node *node);
|
||||
|
||||
/** Get the constraint tree (but don't solve it) */
|
||||
|
||||
TermTree *GetConstraintTree(Node *root);
|
||||
TermTree *GetConstraintTree(Node *root, Node *skip_descendant = 0);
|
||||
|
||||
/** Dispose of the dual model (counterexample) if there is one. */
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -678,6 +686,12 @@ namespace Duality {
|
|||
/** Pop a scope (see Push). Note, you cannot pop axioms. */
|
||||
|
||||
void Pop(int num_scopes);
|
||||
|
||||
/** Return true if the given edge is used in the proof of unsat.
|
||||
Can be called only after Solve or Check returns an unsat result. */
|
||||
|
||||
bool EdgeUsedInProof(Edge *edge);
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
/** Convert a collection of clauses to Nodes and Edges in the RPFP.
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -762,8 +776,19 @@ namespace Duality {
|
|||
|
||||
// int GetLabelsRec(hash_map<ast,int> *memo, const Term &f, std::vector<symbol> &labels, bool labpos);
|
||||
|
||||
/** Compute and save the proof core for future calls to
|
||||
EdgeUsedInProof. You only need to call this if you will pop
|
||||
the solver before calling EdgeUsedInProof.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
void ComputeProofCore();
|
||||
|
||||
private:
|
||||
|
||||
void ClearProofCore(){
|
||||
if(proof_core)
|
||||
delete proof_core;
|
||||
proof_core = 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
Term SuffixVariable(const Term &t, int n);
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -779,10 +804,14 @@ namespace Duality {
|
|||
|
||||
Term ReducedDualEdge(Edge *e);
|
||||
|
||||
TermTree *ToTermTree(Node *root);
|
||||
TermTree *ToTermTree(Node *root, Node *skip_descendant = 0);
|
||||
|
||||
TermTree *ToGoalTree(Node *root);
|
||||
|
||||
void CollapseTermTreeRec(TermTree *root, TermTree *node);
|
||||
|
||||
TermTree *CollapseTermTree(TermTree *node);
|
||||
|
||||
void DecodeTree(Node *root, TermTree *interp, int persist);
|
||||
|
||||
Term GetUpperBound(Node *n);
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -185,6 +185,7 @@ namespace Duality {
|
|||
return clone_quantifier(t,new_body);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
RPFP::Term RPFP::LocalizeRec(Edge *e, hash_map<ast,Term> &memo, const Term &t)
|
||||
{
|
||||
std::pair<ast,Term> foo(t,expr(ctx));
|
||||
|
@ -274,13 +275,15 @@ namespace Duality {
|
|||
return implies(b, Localize(e, e->F.Formula));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
TermTree *RPFP::ToTermTree(Node *root)
|
||||
TermTree *RPFP::ToTermTree(Node *root, Node *skip_descendant)
|
||||
{
|
||||
if(skip_descendant && root == skip_descendant)
|
||||
return new TermTree(ctx.bool_val(true));
|
||||
Edge *e = root->Outgoing;
|
||||
if(!e) return new TermTree(ctx.bool_val(true), std::vector<TermTree *>());
|
||||
std::vector<TermTree *> children(e->Children.size());
|
||||
for(unsigned i = 0; i < children.size(); i++)
|
||||
children[i] = ToTermTree(e->Children[i]);
|
||||
children[i] = ToTermTree(e->Children[i],skip_descendant);
|
||||
// Term top = ReducedDualEdge(e);
|
||||
Term top = e->dual.null() ? ctx.bool_val(true) : e->dual;
|
||||
TermTree *res = new TermTree(top, children);
|
||||
|
@ -623,6 +626,7 @@ namespace Duality {
|
|||
TermTree *goals = NULL;
|
||||
if(ls->need_goals)
|
||||
goals = GetGoalTree(root);
|
||||
ClearProofCore();
|
||||
|
||||
// if (dualModel != null) dualModel.Dispose();
|
||||
// if (dualLabels != null) dualLabels.Dispose();
|
||||
|
@ -644,11 +648,54 @@ namespace Duality {
|
|||
return res;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
void RPFP::CollapseTermTreeRec(TermTree *root, TermTree *node){
|
||||
root->addTerm(node->getTerm());
|
||||
std::vector<Term> &cnsts = node->getTerms();
|
||||
for(unsigned i = 0; i < cnsts.size(); i++)
|
||||
root->addTerm(cnsts[i]);
|
||||
std::vector<TermTree *> &chs = node->getChildren();
|
||||
for(unsigned i = 0; i < chs.size(); i++){
|
||||
CollapseTermTreeRec(root,chs[i]);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
TermTree *RPFP::CollapseTermTree(TermTree *node){
|
||||
std::vector<TermTree *> &chs = node->getChildren();
|
||||
for(unsigned i = 0; i < chs.size(); i++)
|
||||
CollapseTermTreeRec(node,chs[i]);
|
||||
for(unsigned i = 0; i < chs.size(); i++)
|
||||
delete chs[i];
|
||||
chs.clear();
|
||||
return node;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
lbool RPFP::SolveSingleNode(Node *root, Node *node)
|
||||
{
|
||||
timer_start("Solve");
|
||||
TermTree *tree = CollapseTermTree(GetConstraintTree(root,node));
|
||||
tree->getChildren().push_back(CollapseTermTree(ToTermTree(node)));
|
||||
TermTree *interpolant = NULL;
|
||||
ClearProofCore();
|
||||
|
||||
timer_start("interpolate_tree");
|
||||
lbool res = ls->interpolate_tree(tree, interpolant, dualModel,0,true);
|
||||
timer_stop("interpolate_tree");
|
||||
if (res == l_false)
|
||||
{
|
||||
DecodeTree(node, interpolant->getChildren()[0], 0);
|
||||
delete interpolant;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
delete tree;
|
||||
timer_stop("Solve");
|
||||
return res;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/** Get the constraint tree (but don't solve it) */
|
||||
|
||||
TermTree *RPFP::GetConstraintTree(Node *root)
|
||||
TermTree *RPFP::GetConstraintTree(Node *root, Node *skip_descendant)
|
||||
{
|
||||
return AddUpperBound(root, ToTermTree(root));
|
||||
return AddUpperBound(root, ToTermTree(root,skip_descendant));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/** Dispose of the dual model (counterexample) if there is one. */
|
||||
|
@ -677,6 +724,7 @@ namespace Duality {
|
|||
|
||||
check_result RPFP::Check(Node *root, std::vector<Node *> underapproxes, std::vector<Node *> *underapprox_core )
|
||||
{
|
||||
ClearProofCore();
|
||||
// if (dualModel != null) dualModel.Dispose();
|
||||
check_result res;
|
||||
if(!underapproxes.size())
|
||||
|
@ -713,6 +761,7 @@ namespace Duality {
|
|||
|
||||
check_result RPFP::CheckUpdateModel(Node *root, std::vector<expr> assumps){
|
||||
// check_result temp1 = slvr.check(); // no idea why I need to do this
|
||||
ClearProofCore();
|
||||
check_result res = slvr.check_keep_model(assumps.size(),&assumps[0]);
|
||||
dualModel = slvr.get_model();
|
||||
return res;
|
||||
|
@ -1760,9 +1809,9 @@ namespace Duality {
|
|||
expr conj = ctx.make(And,conjuncts);
|
||||
s.add(conj);
|
||||
check_result res = s.check();
|
||||
s.pop(1);
|
||||
if(res != unsat)
|
||||
throw "should be unsat";
|
||||
s.pop(1);
|
||||
|
||||
for(unsigned i = 0; i < conjuncts.size(); ){
|
||||
std::swap(conjuncts[i],conjuncts.back());
|
||||
|
@ -2276,8 +2325,28 @@ namespace Duality {
|
|||
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
void RPFP::ComputeProofCore(){
|
||||
if(!proof_core){
|
||||
std::vector<expr> assumps;
|
||||
slvr.get_proof().get_assumptions(assumps);
|
||||
proof_core = new hash_set<ast>;
|
||||
for(unsigned i = 0; i < assumps.size(); i++)
|
||||
proof_core->insert(assumps[i]);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
bool RPFP::EdgeUsedInProof(Edge *edge){
|
||||
ComputeProofCore();
|
||||
if(!edge->dual.null() && proof_core->find(edge->dual) != proof_core->end())
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
for(unsigned i = 0; i < edge->constraints.size(); i++)
|
||||
if(proof_core->find(edge->constraints[i]) != proof_core->end())
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
RPFP::~RPFP(){
|
||||
ClearProofCore();
|
||||
for(unsigned i = 0; i < nodes.size(); i++)
|
||||
delete nodes[i];
|
||||
for(unsigned i = 0; i < edges.size(); i++)
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -184,7 +184,7 @@ namespace Duality {
|
|||
best.insert(*it);
|
||||
}
|
||||
#else
|
||||
virtual void ChooseExpand(const std::set<RPFP::Node *> &choices, std::set<RPFP::Node *> &best, bool high_priority=false){
|
||||
virtual void ChooseExpand(const std::set<RPFP::Node *> &choices, std::set<RPFP::Node *> &best, bool high_priority=false, bool best_only=false){
|
||||
if(high_priority) return;
|
||||
int best_score = INT_MAX;
|
||||
int worst_score = 0;
|
||||
|
@ -194,13 +194,13 @@ namespace Duality {
|
|||
best_score = std::min(best_score,score);
|
||||
worst_score = std::max(worst_score,score);
|
||||
}
|
||||
int cutoff = best_score + (worst_score-best_score)/2;
|
||||
int cutoff = best_only ? best_score : (best_score + (worst_score-best_score)/2);
|
||||
for(std::set<Node *>::iterator it = choices.begin(), en = choices.end(); it != en; ++it)
|
||||
if(scores[(*it)->map].updates <= cutoff)
|
||||
best.insert(*it);
|
||||
}
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
/** Called when done expanding a tree */
|
||||
virtual void Done() {}
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
@ -1607,12 +1607,12 @@ namespace Duality {
|
|||
heuristic->ChooseExpand(choices, best);
|
||||
}
|
||||
#else
|
||||
void ExpansionChoicesFull(std::set<Node *> &best, bool high_priority){
|
||||
void ExpansionChoicesFull(std::set<Node *> &best, bool high_priority, bool best_only = false){
|
||||
std::set<Node *> choices;
|
||||
for(std::list<RPFP::Node *>::iterator it = leaves.begin(), en = leaves.end(); it != en; ++it)
|
||||
if (high_priority || !tree->Empty(*it)) // if used in the counter-model
|
||||
choices.insert(*it);
|
||||
heuristic->ChooseExpand(choices, best, high_priority);
|
||||
heuristic->ChooseExpand(choices, best, high_priority, best_only);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
void ExpansionChoicesRec(std::vector <Node *> &unused_set, std::vector <Node *> &used_set,
|
||||
|
@ -1650,9 +1650,9 @@ namespace Duality {
|
|||
|
||||
std::set<Node *> old_choices;
|
||||
|
||||
void ExpansionChoices(std::set<Node *> &best, bool high_priority){
|
||||
void ExpansionChoices(std::set<Node *> &best, bool high_priority, bool best_only = false){
|
||||
if(!underapprox || constrained || high_priority){
|
||||
ExpansionChoicesFull(best, high_priority);
|
||||
ExpansionChoicesFull(best, high_priority,best_only);
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
std::vector <Node *> unused_set, used_set;
|
||||
|
@ -1684,7 +1684,7 @@ namespace Duality {
|
|||
timer_start("ExpandSomeNodes");
|
||||
timer_start("ExpansionChoices");
|
||||
std::set<Node *> choices;
|
||||
ExpansionChoices(choices,high_priority);
|
||||
ExpansionChoices(choices,high_priority,max != INT_MAX);
|
||||
timer_stop("ExpansionChoices");
|
||||
std::list<RPFP::Node *> leaves_copy = leaves; // copy so can modify orig
|
||||
leaves.clear();
|
||||
|
@ -1740,38 +1740,54 @@ namespace Duality {
|
|||
if(slvr_level != stack.back().level)
|
||||
throw "stacks out of sync!";
|
||||
|
||||
res = tree->Solve(top, 1); // incremental solve, keep interpolants for one pop
|
||||
// res = tree->Solve(top, 1); // incremental solve, keep interpolants for one pop
|
||||
check_result foo = tree->Check(top);
|
||||
res = foo == unsat ? l_false : l_true;
|
||||
|
||||
if (res == l_false) {
|
||||
if (stack.empty()) // should never happen
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
|
||||
std::vector<Node *> &expansions = stack.back().expansions;
|
||||
int update_count = 0;
|
||||
for(unsigned i = 0; i < expansions.size(); i++){
|
||||
tree->Generalize(expansions[i]);
|
||||
if(RecordUpdate(expansions[i]))
|
||||
update_count++;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if(update_count == 0)
|
||||
std::cout << "backtracked without learning\n";
|
||||
tree->Pop(1);
|
||||
hash_set<Node *> leaves_to_remove;
|
||||
for(unsigned i = 0; i < expansions.size(); i++){
|
||||
Node *node = expansions[i];
|
||||
// if(node != top)
|
||||
// tree->ConstrainParent(node->Incoming[0],node);
|
||||
std::vector<Node *> &cs = node->Outgoing->Children;
|
||||
for(unsigned i = 0; i < cs.size(); i++){
|
||||
leaves_to_remove.insert(cs[i]);
|
||||
UnmapNode(cs[i]);
|
||||
if(std::find(updated_nodes.begin(),updated_nodes.end(),cs[i]) != updated_nodes.end())
|
||||
throw "help!";
|
||||
{
|
||||
std::vector<Node *> &expansions = stack.back().expansions;
|
||||
int update_count = 0;
|
||||
for(unsigned i = 0; i < expansions.size(); i++){
|
||||
Node *node = expansions[i];
|
||||
tree->SolveSingleNode(top,node);
|
||||
tree->Generalize(node);
|
||||
if(RecordUpdate(node))
|
||||
update_count++;
|
||||
}
|
||||
RemoveExpansion(node);
|
||||
if(update_count == 0)
|
||||
std::cout << "backtracked without learning\n";
|
||||
}
|
||||
RemoveLeaves(leaves_to_remove);
|
||||
stack.pop_back();
|
||||
tree->ComputeProofCore(); // need to compute the proof core before popping solver
|
||||
while(1) {
|
||||
std::vector<Node *> &expansions = stack.back().expansions;
|
||||
bool prev_level_used = LevelUsedInProof(stack.size()-2); // need to compute this before pop
|
||||
tree->Pop(1);
|
||||
hash_set<Node *> leaves_to_remove;
|
||||
for(unsigned i = 0; i < expansions.size(); i++){
|
||||
Node *node = expansions[i];
|
||||
// if(node != top)
|
||||
// tree->ConstrainParent(node->Incoming[0],node);
|
||||
std::vector<Node *> &cs = node->Outgoing->Children;
|
||||
for(unsigned i = 0; i < cs.size(); i++){
|
||||
leaves_to_remove.insert(cs[i]);
|
||||
UnmapNode(cs[i]);
|
||||
if(std::find(updated_nodes.begin(),updated_nodes.end(),cs[i]) != updated_nodes.end())
|
||||
throw "help!";
|
||||
}
|
||||
RemoveExpansion(node);
|
||||
}
|
||||
RemoveLeaves(leaves_to_remove);
|
||||
stack.pop_back();
|
||||
if(prev_level_used || stack.size() == 1) break;
|
||||
RemoveUpdateNodesAtCurrentLevel(); // this level is about to be deleted -- remove its children from update list
|
||||
std::vector<Node *> &unused_ex = stack.back().expansions;
|
||||
for(unsigned i = 0; i < unused_ex.size(); i++)
|
||||
heuristic->Update(unused_ex[i]->map); // make it less likely to expand this node in future
|
||||
}
|
||||
HandleUpdatedNodes();
|
||||
if(stack.size() == 1)
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
|
@ -1782,8 +1798,10 @@ namespace Duality {
|
|||
for(unsigned i = 0; i < expansions.size(); i++){
|
||||
tree->FixCurrentState(expansions[i]->Outgoing);
|
||||
}
|
||||
#if 0
|
||||
if(tree->slvr.check() == unsat)
|
||||
throw "help!";
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
stack.push_back(stack_entry());
|
||||
stack.back().level = tree->slvr.get_scope_level();
|
||||
if(ExpandSomeNodes(false,1)){
|
||||
|
@ -1798,6 +1816,27 @@ namespace Duality {
|
|||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
bool LevelUsedInProof(unsigned level){
|
||||
std::vector<Node *> &expansions = stack[level].expansions;
|
||||
for(unsigned i = 0; i < expansions.size(); i++)
|
||||
if(tree->EdgeUsedInProof(expansions[i]->Outgoing))
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
void RemoveUpdateNodesAtCurrentLevel() {
|
||||
for(std::list<Node *>::iterator it = updated_nodes.begin(), en = updated_nodes.end(); it != en;){
|
||||
Node *node = *it;
|
||||
if(AtCurrentStackLevel(node->Incoming[0]->Parent)){
|
||||
std::list<Node *>::iterator victim = it;
|
||||
++it;
|
||||
updated_nodes.erase(victim);
|
||||
}
|
||||
else
|
||||
++it;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
void RemoveLeaves(hash_set<Node *> &leaves_to_remove){
|
||||
std::list<RPFP::Node *> leaves_copy;
|
||||
leaves_copy.swap(leaves);
|
||||
|
@ -2270,7 +2309,7 @@ namespace Duality {
|
|||
return name;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
virtual void ChooseExpand(const std::set<RPFP::Node *> &choices, std::set<RPFP::Node *> &best, bool high_priority){
|
||||
virtual void ChooseExpand(const std::set<RPFP::Node *> &choices, std::set<RPFP::Node *> &best, bool high_priority, bool best_only){
|
||||
if(!high_priority || !old_cex.tree){
|
||||
Heuristic::ChooseExpand(choices,best,false);
|
||||
return;
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -481,9 +481,9 @@ expr context::make_quant(decl_kind op, const std::vector<sort> &_sorts, const st
|
|||
for(unsigned i = 0; i < theory.size(); i++)
|
||||
_theory[i] = theory[i];
|
||||
|
||||
push();
|
||||
|
||||
if(!incremental){
|
||||
push();
|
||||
for(unsigned i = 0; i < linear_assumptions.size(); i++)
|
||||
for(unsigned j = 0; j < linear_assumptions[i].size(); j++)
|
||||
add(linear_assumptions[i][j]);
|
||||
|
@ -522,7 +522,8 @@ expr context::make_quant(decl_kind op, const std::vector<sort> &_sorts, const st
|
|||
}
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
pop();
|
||||
if(!incremental)
|
||||
pop();
|
||||
|
||||
return (res == unsat) ? l_false : ((res == sat) ? l_true : l_undef);
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -554,6 +555,29 @@ expr context::make_quant(decl_kind op, const std::vector<sort> &_sorts, const st
|
|||
return "";
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
static void get_assumptions_rec(stl_ext::hash_set<ast> &memo, const proof &pf, std::vector<expr> &assumps){
|
||||
if(memo.find(pf) != memo.end())return;
|
||||
memo.insert(pf);
|
||||
pfrule dk = pf.rule();
|
||||
if(dk == PR_ASSERTED){
|
||||
expr con = pf.conc();
|
||||
assumps.push_back(con);
|
||||
}
|
||||
else {
|
||||
unsigned nprems = pf.num_prems();
|
||||
for(unsigned i = 0; i < nprems; i++){
|
||||
proof arg = pf.prem(i);
|
||||
get_assumptions_rec(memo,arg,assumps);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
void proof::get_assumptions(std::vector<expr> &assumps){
|
||||
stl_ext::hash_set<ast> memo;
|
||||
get_assumptions_rec(memo,*this,assumps);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
void ast::show() const{
|
||||
std::cout << mk_pp(raw(), m()) << std::endl;
|
||||
|
@ -564,6 +588,15 @@ expr context::make_quant(decl_kind op, const std::vector<sort> &_sorts, const st
|
|||
std::cout << std::endl;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
void solver::show() {
|
||||
unsigned n = m_solver->get_num_assertions();
|
||||
if(!n)
|
||||
return;
|
||||
ast_smt_pp pp(m());
|
||||
for (unsigned i = 0; i < n-1; ++i)
|
||||
pp.add_assumption(m_solver->get_assertion(i));
|
||||
pp.display_smt2(std::cout, m_solver->get_assertion(n-1));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
void include_ast_show(ast &a){
|
||||
a.show();
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -393,6 +393,7 @@ namespace Duality {
|
|||
sort array_range() const;
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class func_decl : public ast {
|
||||
public:
|
||||
func_decl() : ast() {}
|
||||
|
@ -593,6 +594,36 @@ namespace Duality {
|
|||
};
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
typedef ::decl_kind pfrule;
|
||||
|
||||
class proof : public ast {
|
||||
public:
|
||||
proof(context & c):ast(c) {}
|
||||
proof(context & c, ::proof *s):ast(c, s) {}
|
||||
proof(proof const & s):ast(s) {}
|
||||
operator ::proof*() const { return to_app(raw()); }
|
||||
proof & operator=(proof const & s) { return static_cast<proof&>(ast::operator=(s)); }
|
||||
|
||||
pfrule rule() const {
|
||||
::func_decl *d = to_app(raw())->get_decl();
|
||||
return d->get_decl_kind();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
unsigned num_prems() const {
|
||||
return to_app(raw())->get_num_args() - 1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
expr conc() const {
|
||||
return ctx().cook(to_app(raw())->get_arg(num_prems()));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
proof prem(unsigned i) const {
|
||||
return proof(ctx(),to_app(to_app(raw())->get_arg(i)));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
void get_assumptions(std::vector<expr> &assumps);
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
#if 0
|
||||
|
||||
#if Z3_MAJOR_VERSION > 4 || Z3_MAJOR_VERSION == 4 && Z3_MINOR_VERSION >= 3
|
||||
|
@ -870,6 +901,12 @@ namespace Duality {
|
|||
|
||||
unsigned get_scope_level(){return m_solver->get_scope_level();}
|
||||
|
||||
void show();
|
||||
|
||||
proof get_proof(){
|
||||
return proof(ctx(),m_solver->get_proof());
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
#if 0
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -501,5 +501,3 @@ void interpolation_options_struct::apply(iz3base &b){
|
|||
b.set_option((*it).first,(*it).second);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -359,6 +359,12 @@ class iz3mgr {
|
|||
return fid == m().get_basic_family_id() && k == BOOL_SORT;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
bool is_array_type(type t){
|
||||
family_id fid = to_sort(t)->get_family_id();
|
||||
decl_kind k = to_sort(t)->get_decl_kind();
|
||||
return fid == m_array_fid && k == ARRAY_SORT;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
type get_range_type(symb s){
|
||||
return to_func_decl(s)->get_range();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -473,7 +473,12 @@ class iz3proof_itp_impl : public iz3proof_itp {
|
|||
hash_map<ast,ast> simplify_memo;
|
||||
|
||||
ast simplify(const ast &t){
|
||||
return simplify_rec(t);
|
||||
ast res = normalize(simplify_rec(t));
|
||||
#ifdef BOGUS_QUANTS
|
||||
if(localization_vars.size())
|
||||
res = add_quants(z3_simplify(res));
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
return res;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
ast simplify_rec(const ast &e){
|
||||
|
@ -550,11 +555,11 @@ class iz3proof_itp_impl : public iz3proof_itp {
|
|||
}
|
||||
|
||||
ast simplify_sum(std::vector<ast> &args){
|
||||
ast cond = mk_true();
|
||||
ast Aproves = mk_true(), Bproves = mk_true();
|
||||
ast ineq = args[0];
|
||||
if(!is_normal_ineq(ineq)) throw cannot_simplify();
|
||||
sum_cond_ineq(ineq,cond,args[1],args[2]);
|
||||
return my_implies(cond,ineq);
|
||||
sum_cond_ineq(ineq,args[1],args[2],Aproves,Bproves);
|
||||
return my_and(Aproves,my_implies(Bproves,ineq));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
ast simplify_rotate_sum(const ast &pl, const ast &pf){
|
||||
|
@ -567,38 +572,42 @@ class iz3proof_itp_impl : public iz3proof_itp {
|
|||
return sym(chain) == concat;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
ast ineq_from_chain(const ast &chain, ast &cond){
|
||||
if(sym(chain) == normal)
|
||||
throw "normalized inequalities not supported here";
|
||||
if(is_rewrite_chain(chain)){
|
||||
ast last = chain_last(chain);
|
||||
ast rest = chain_rest(chain);
|
||||
if(is_true(rest) && is_rewrite_side(LitA,last)
|
||||
&& is_true(rewrite_lhs(last))){
|
||||
cond = my_and(cond,rewrite_cond(last));
|
||||
return rewrite_rhs(last);
|
||||
}
|
||||
if(is_rewrite_side(LitB,last) && is_true(rewrite_cond(last)))
|
||||
return ineq_from_chain(rest,cond);
|
||||
#if 0
|
||||
ast ineq_from_chain_simple(const ast &chain, ast &cond){
|
||||
if(is_true(chain))
|
||||
return chain;
|
||||
ast last = chain_last(chain);
|
||||
ast rest = chain_rest(chain);
|
||||
if(is_true(rest) && is_rewrite_side(LitA,last)
|
||||
&& is_true(rewrite_lhs(last))){
|
||||
cond = my_and(cond,rewrite_cond(last));
|
||||
return rewrite_rhs(last);
|
||||
}
|
||||
if(is_rewrite_side(LitB,last) && is_true(rewrite_cond(last)))
|
||||
return ineq_from_chain_simple(rest,cond);
|
||||
return chain;
|
||||
}
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
ast ineq_from_chain(const ast &chain, ast &Aproves, ast &Bproves){
|
||||
if(is_rewrite_chain(chain))
|
||||
return rewrite_chain_to_normal_ineq(chain,Aproves,Bproves);
|
||||
return chain;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
void sum_cond_ineq(ast &ineq, ast &cond, const ast &coeff2, const ast &ineq2){
|
||||
|
||||
void sum_cond_ineq(ast &ineq, const ast &coeff2, const ast &ineq2, ast &Aproves, ast &Bproves){
|
||||
opr o = op(ineq2);
|
||||
if(o == Implies){
|
||||
sum_cond_ineq(ineq,cond,coeff2,arg(ineq2,1));
|
||||
cond = my_and(cond,arg(ineq2,0));
|
||||
sum_cond_ineq(ineq,coeff2,arg(ineq2,1),Aproves,Bproves);
|
||||
Bproves = my_and(Bproves,arg(ineq2,0));
|
||||
}
|
||||
else {
|
||||
if(sym(ineq) == normal || sym(ineq2) == normal){
|
||||
ast Aproves = mk_true();
|
||||
sum_normal_ineq(ineq,coeff2,ineq2,Aproves,cond);
|
||||
if(!is_true(Aproves))
|
||||
throw "Aproves not handled in sum_cond_ineq";
|
||||
ast the_ineq = ineq_from_chain(ineq2,Aproves,Bproves);
|
||||
if(sym(ineq) == normal || sym(the_ineq) == normal){
|
||||
sum_normal_ineq(ineq,coeff2,the_ineq,Aproves,Bproves);
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
ast the_ineq = ineq_from_chain(ineq2,cond);
|
||||
if(is_ineq(the_ineq))
|
||||
linear_comb(ineq,coeff2,the_ineq);
|
||||
else
|
||||
|
@ -621,10 +630,10 @@ class iz3proof_itp_impl : public iz3proof_itp {
|
|||
ast in1,in2,n1,n2;
|
||||
destruct_normal(ineq,in1,n1);
|
||||
destruct_normal(ineq2,in2,n2);
|
||||
ast dummy;
|
||||
sum_cond_ineq(in1,dummy,coeff2,in2);
|
||||
ast dummy1, dummy2;
|
||||
sum_cond_ineq(in1,coeff2,in2,dummy1,dummy2);
|
||||
n1 = merge_normal_chains(n1,n2, Aproves, Bproves);
|
||||
ineq = make(normal,in1,n1);
|
||||
ineq = make_normal(in1,n1);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
bool is_ineq(const ast &ineq){
|
||||
|
@ -639,7 +648,7 @@ class iz3proof_itp_impl : public iz3proof_itp {
|
|||
ast in1,n1;
|
||||
destruct_normal(ineq1,in1,n1);
|
||||
in1 = idiv_ineq(in1,divisor);
|
||||
return make(normal,in1,n1);
|
||||
return make_normal(in1,n1);
|
||||
}
|
||||
if(divisor == make_int(rational(1)))
|
||||
return ineq1;
|
||||
|
@ -649,17 +658,23 @@ class iz3proof_itp_impl : public iz3proof_itp {
|
|||
return make(op(ineq),mk_idiv(arg(ineq,0),divisor),mk_idiv(arg(ineq,1),divisor));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
ast rotate_sum_rec(const ast &pl, const ast &pf, ast &cond, ast &ineq){
|
||||
ast rotate_sum_rec(const ast &pl, const ast &pf, ast &Bproves, ast &ineq){
|
||||
if(pf == pl)
|
||||
return my_implies(cond,simplify_ineq(ineq));
|
||||
return my_implies(Bproves,simplify_ineq(ineq));
|
||||
if(op(pf) == Uninterpreted && sym(pf) == sum){
|
||||
if(arg(pf,2) == pl){
|
||||
sum_cond_ineq(ineq,cond,make_int("1"),arg(pf,0));
|
||||
ast Aproves = mk_true();
|
||||
sum_cond_ineq(ineq,make_int("1"),arg(pf,0),Aproves,Bproves);
|
||||
if(!is_true(Aproves))
|
||||
throw "help!";
|
||||
ineq = idiv_ineq(ineq,arg(pf,1));
|
||||
return my_implies(cond,ineq);
|
||||
return my_implies(Bproves,ineq);
|
||||
}
|
||||
sum_cond_ineq(ineq,cond,arg(pf,1),arg(pf,2));
|
||||
return rotate_sum_rec(pl,arg(pf,0),cond,ineq);
|
||||
ast Aproves = mk_true();
|
||||
sum_cond_ineq(ineq,arg(pf,1),arg(pf,2),Aproves,Bproves);
|
||||
if(!is_true(Aproves))
|
||||
throw "help!";
|
||||
return rotate_sum_rec(pl,arg(pf,0),Bproves,ineq);
|
||||
}
|
||||
throw cannot_simplify();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -669,28 +684,30 @@ class iz3proof_itp_impl : public iz3proof_itp {
|
|||
ast equality = arg(neg_equality,0);
|
||||
ast x = arg(equality,0);
|
||||
ast y = arg(equality,1);
|
||||
ast cond1 = mk_true();
|
||||
ast xleqy = round_ineq(ineq_from_chain(arg(pf,1),cond1));
|
||||
ast yleqx = round_ineq(ineq_from_chain(arg(pf,2),cond1));
|
||||
ast Aproves1 = mk_true(), Bproves1 = mk_true();
|
||||
ast xleqy = round_ineq(ineq_from_chain(arg(pf,1),Aproves1,Bproves1));
|
||||
ast yleqx = round_ineq(ineq_from_chain(arg(pf,2),Aproves1,Bproves1));
|
||||
ast ineq1 = make(Leq,make_int("0"),make_int("0"));
|
||||
sum_cond_ineq(ineq1,cond1,make_int("-1"),xleqy);
|
||||
sum_cond_ineq(ineq1,cond1,make_int("-1"),yleqx);
|
||||
cond1 = my_and(cond1,z3_simplify(ineq1));
|
||||
ast cond2 = mk_true();
|
||||
sum_cond_ineq(ineq1,make_int("-1"),xleqy,Aproves1,Bproves1);
|
||||
sum_cond_ineq(ineq1,make_int("-1"),yleqx,Aproves1,Bproves1);
|
||||
Bproves1 = my_and(Bproves1,z3_simplify(ineq1));
|
||||
ast Aproves2 = mk_true(), Bproves2 = mk_true();
|
||||
ast ineq2 = make(Leq,make_int("0"),make_int("0"));
|
||||
sum_cond_ineq(ineq2,cond2,make_int("1"),xleqy);
|
||||
sum_cond_ineq(ineq2,cond2,make_int("1"),yleqx);
|
||||
cond2 = z3_simplify(ineq2);
|
||||
sum_cond_ineq(ineq2,make_int("1"),xleqy,Aproves2,Bproves2);
|
||||
sum_cond_ineq(ineq2,make_int("1"),yleqx,Aproves2,Bproves2);
|
||||
Bproves2 = z3_simplify(ineq2);
|
||||
if(!is_true(Aproves1) || !is_true(Aproves2))
|
||||
throw "help!";
|
||||
if(get_term_type(x) == LitA){
|
||||
ast iter = z3_simplify(make(Plus,x,get_ineq_rhs(xleqy)));
|
||||
ast rewrite1 = make_rewrite(LitA,top_pos,cond1,make(Equal,x,iter));
|
||||
ast rewrite2 = make_rewrite(LitB,top_pos,cond2,make(Equal,iter,y));
|
||||
ast rewrite1 = make_rewrite(LitA,top_pos,Bproves1,make(Equal,x,iter));
|
||||
ast rewrite2 = make_rewrite(LitB,top_pos,Bproves2,make(Equal,iter,y));
|
||||
return chain_cons(chain_cons(mk_true(),rewrite1),rewrite2);
|
||||
}
|
||||
if(get_term_type(y) == LitA){
|
||||
ast iter = z3_simplify(make(Plus,y,get_ineq_rhs(yleqx)));
|
||||
ast rewrite2 = make_rewrite(LitA,top_pos,cond1,make(Equal,iter,y));
|
||||
ast rewrite1 = make_rewrite(LitB,top_pos,cond2,make(Equal,x,iter));
|
||||
ast rewrite2 = make_rewrite(LitA,top_pos,Bproves1,make(Equal,iter,y));
|
||||
ast rewrite1 = make_rewrite(LitB,top_pos,Bproves2,make(Equal,x,iter));
|
||||
return chain_cons(chain_cons(mk_true(),rewrite1),rewrite2);
|
||||
}
|
||||
throw cannot_simplify();
|
||||
|
@ -723,7 +740,7 @@ class iz3proof_itp_impl : public iz3proof_itp {
|
|||
}
|
||||
else {
|
||||
ast itp = make(Leq,make_int(rational(0)),make_int(rational(0)));
|
||||
return make(normal,itp,cons_normal(fix_normal(lhs,rhs,equa),mk_true()));
|
||||
return make_normal(itp,cons_normal(fix_normal(lhs,rhs,equa),mk_true()));
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -852,7 +869,7 @@ class iz3proof_itp_impl : public iz3proof_itp {
|
|||
ast sub_chain = extract_rewrites(chain,pos);
|
||||
if(is_true(sub_chain))
|
||||
throw "bad inequality rewriting";
|
||||
ast new_normal = make_normal(ineq2,ineq1,reverse_chain(sub_chain));
|
||||
ast new_normal = make_normal_step(ineq2,ineq1,reverse_chain(sub_chain));
|
||||
normals = merge_normal_chains(normals,cons_normal(new_normal,mk_true()), Aproves, Bproves);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -876,7 +893,7 @@ class iz3proof_itp_impl : public iz3proof_itp {
|
|||
ast mc = z3_simplify(chain_side_proves(LitA,pref));
|
||||
Aproves = my_and(Aproves,mc);
|
||||
}
|
||||
return make(normal,itp,nc);
|
||||
return make_normal(itp,nc);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* Given a chain rewrite chain deriving not P and a rewrite chain deriving P, return an interpolant. */
|
||||
|
@ -913,7 +930,7 @@ class iz3proof_itp_impl : public iz3proof_itp {
|
|||
ast interp;
|
||||
if(is_normal_ineq(Q2)){ // inequalities are special
|
||||
ast nQ2 = rewrite_chain_to_normal_ineq(chain,Aproves,Bproves);
|
||||
sum_cond_ineq(nQ2,Bproves,make_int(rational(1)),Q2);
|
||||
sum_cond_ineq(nQ2,make_int(rational(1)),Q2,Aproves,Bproves);
|
||||
interp = normalize(nQ2);
|
||||
}
|
||||
else
|
||||
|
@ -1549,7 +1566,7 @@ class iz3proof_itp_impl : public iz3proof_itp {
|
|||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
if(op(ineq) == Leq){
|
||||
if(op(ineq) == Leq || op(ineq) == Geq){
|
||||
lhs = srhs;
|
||||
rhs = arg(ineq,1);
|
||||
return;
|
||||
|
@ -1604,7 +1621,7 @@ class iz3proof_itp_impl : public iz3proof_itp {
|
|||
}
|
||||
|
||||
ast normal_lhs(const ast &t){
|
||||
return arg(arg(t,0),1);
|
||||
return arg(arg(t,0),0);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
ast normal_rhs(const ast &t){
|
||||
|
@ -1615,16 +1632,22 @@ class iz3proof_itp_impl : public iz3proof_itp {
|
|||
return arg(t,1);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
ast make_normal(const ast &lhs, const ast &rhs, const ast &proof){
|
||||
ast make_normal_step(const ast &lhs, const ast &rhs, const ast &proof){
|
||||
return make(normal_step,make_equiv(lhs,rhs),proof);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
ast make_normal(const ast &ineq, const ast &nrml){
|
||||
if(!is_ineq(ineq))
|
||||
throw "what?";
|
||||
return make(normal,ineq,nrml);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
ast fix_normal(const ast &lhs, const ast &rhs, const ast &proof){
|
||||
LitType rhst = get_term_type(rhs);
|
||||
if(rhst != LitMixed || ast_id(lhs) < ast_id(rhs))
|
||||
return make_normal(lhs,rhs,proof);
|
||||
return make_normal_step(lhs,rhs,proof);
|
||||
else
|
||||
return make_normal(rhs,lhs,reverse_chain(proof));
|
||||
return make_normal_step(rhs,lhs,reverse_chain(proof));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
ast chain_side_proves(LitType side, const ast &chain){
|
||||
|
@ -1658,7 +1681,7 @@ class iz3proof_itp_impl : public iz3proof_itp {
|
|||
if(t1 == LitMixed && (t2 != LitMixed || tid2 > tid1)){
|
||||
ast new_proof = concat_rewrite_chain(reverse_chain(pf1),pf2);
|
||||
new_normal = f2;
|
||||
trans[rhs1] = make_normal(rhs1,rhs2,new_proof);
|
||||
trans[rhs1] = make_normal_step(rhs1,rhs2,new_proof);
|
||||
}
|
||||
else if(t2 == LitMixed && (t1 != LitMixed || tid1 > tid2))
|
||||
return merge_normal_chains_rec(chain2,chain1,trans,Aproves,Bproves);
|
||||
|
@ -1671,7 +1694,7 @@ class iz3proof_itp_impl : public iz3proof_itp {
|
|||
Aproves = my_and(Aproves,mcB);
|
||||
ast rep = apply_rewrite_chain(rhs1,Aproof);
|
||||
new_proof = concat_rewrite_chain(pf1,Aproof);
|
||||
new_normal = make_normal(rhs1,rep,new_proof);
|
||||
new_normal = make_normal_step(rhs1,rep,new_proof);
|
||||
}
|
||||
else if(t1 == LitA && t2 == LitB)
|
||||
return merge_normal_chains_rec(chain2,chain1,trans,Aproves,Bproves);
|
||||
|
@ -1701,7 +1724,7 @@ class iz3proof_itp_impl : public iz3proof_itp {
|
|||
if(it != trans.end()){
|
||||
const ast &f2 = it->second;
|
||||
ast pf = concat_rewrite_chain(normal_proof(f),normal_proof(f2));
|
||||
new_normal = make_normal(normal_lhs(f),normal_rhs(f2),pf);
|
||||
new_normal = make_normal_step(normal_lhs(f),normal_rhs(f2),pf);
|
||||
}
|
||||
else
|
||||
new_normal = f;
|
||||
|
@ -1715,9 +1738,36 @@ class iz3proof_itp_impl : public iz3proof_itp {
|
|||
return res;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
ast normalize(const ast &t){
|
||||
bool destruct_cond_ineq(ast t, ast &Aproves, ast &Bproves, ast&ineq){
|
||||
if(op(t) == And){
|
||||
Aproves = arg(t,0);
|
||||
t = arg(t,1);
|
||||
}
|
||||
else
|
||||
Aproves = mk_true();
|
||||
if(op(t) == Implies){
|
||||
Bproves = arg(t,0);
|
||||
t = arg(t,1);
|
||||
}
|
||||
else
|
||||
Bproves = mk_true();
|
||||
if(is_normal_ineq(t)){
|
||||
ineq = t;
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
ast cons_cond_ineq(const ast &Aproves, const ast &Bproves, const ast &ineq){
|
||||
return my_and(Aproves,my_implies(Bproves,ineq));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
ast normalize(const ast &ct){
|
||||
ast Aproves,Bproves,t;
|
||||
if(!destruct_cond_ineq(ct,Aproves,Bproves,t))
|
||||
return ct;
|
||||
if(sym(t) != normal)
|
||||
return t;
|
||||
return ct;
|
||||
ast chain = arg(t,1);
|
||||
hash_map<ast,ast> map;
|
||||
for(ast c = chain; !is_true(c); c = normal_rest(c)){
|
||||
|
@ -1727,7 +1777,7 @@ class iz3proof_itp_impl : public iz3proof_itp {
|
|||
map[lhs] = rhs;
|
||||
}
|
||||
ast res = subst(map,arg(t,0));
|
||||
return res;
|
||||
return cons_cond_ineq(Aproves,Bproves,res);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/** Make an assumption node. The given clause is assumed in the given frame. */
|
||||
|
@ -1848,8 +1898,7 @@ class iz3proof_itp_impl : public iz3proof_itp {
|
|||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/** Make an axiom node. The conclusion must be an instance of an axiom. */
|
||||
virtual node make_axiom(const std::vector<ast> &conclusion){
|
||||
prover::range frng = pv->range_full();
|
||||
virtual node make_axiom(const std::vector<ast> &conclusion, prover::range frng){
|
||||
int nargs = conclusion.size();
|
||||
std::vector<ast> largs(nargs);
|
||||
std::vector<ast> eqs;
|
||||
|
@ -1874,6 +1923,10 @@ class iz3proof_itp_impl : public iz3proof_itp {
|
|||
return itp;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
virtual node make_axiom(const std::vector<ast> &conclusion){
|
||||
return make_axiom(conclusion,pv->range_full());
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/** Make a Contra node. This rule takes a derivation of the form
|
||||
Gamma |- False and produces |- \/~Gamma. */
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -2299,7 +2352,8 @@ class iz3proof_itp_impl : public iz3proof_itp {
|
|||
int nargs = num_args(e);
|
||||
if(nargs > 0 /* && (!is_local(e) || flo <= hi || fhi >= lo) */){
|
||||
prover::range frng = rng;
|
||||
if(op(e) == Uninterpreted){
|
||||
opr o = op(e);
|
||||
if(o == Uninterpreted){
|
||||
symb f = sym(e);
|
||||
prover::range srng = pv->sym_range(f);
|
||||
if(pv->ranges_intersect(srng,rng)) // localize to desired range if possible
|
||||
|
@ -2307,6 +2361,9 @@ class iz3proof_itp_impl : public iz3proof_itp {
|
|||
else
|
||||
frng = srng; // this term will be localized
|
||||
}
|
||||
else if(o == Plus || o == Times){ // don't want bound variables inside arith ops
|
||||
frng = erng; // this term will be localized
|
||||
}
|
||||
std::vector<ast> largs(nargs);
|
||||
std::vector<ast> eqs;
|
||||
std::vector<ast> pfs;
|
||||
|
@ -2333,6 +2390,9 @@ class iz3proof_itp_impl : public iz3proof_itp {
|
|||
if(pv->ranges_intersect(pv->ast_scope(e),rng))
|
||||
return e; // this term occurs in range, so it's O.K.
|
||||
|
||||
if(is_array_type(get_type(e)))
|
||||
throw "help!";
|
||||
|
||||
// choose a frame for the constraint that is close to range
|
||||
int frame = pv->range_near(pv->ast_scope(e),rng);
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -2362,7 +2422,11 @@ class iz3proof_itp_impl : public iz3proof_itp {
|
|||
/* Return an interpolant from a proof of false */
|
||||
ast interpolate(const node &pf){
|
||||
// proof of false must be a formula, with quantified symbols
|
||||
#ifndef BOGUS_QUANTS
|
||||
return add_quants(z3_simplify(pf));
|
||||
#else
|
||||
return z3_simplify(pf);
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
ast resolve_with_quantifier(const ast &pivot1, const ast &conj1,
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -70,6 +70,9 @@ class iz3proof_itp : public iz3mgr {
|
|||
/** Make an axiom node. The conclusion must be an instance of an axiom. */
|
||||
virtual node make_axiom(const std::vector<ast> &conclusion) = 0;
|
||||
|
||||
/** Make an axiom node. The conclusion must be an instance of an axiom. Localize axiom instance to range*/
|
||||
virtual node make_axiom(const std::vector<ast> &conclusion, prover::range) = 0;
|
||||
|
||||
/** Make a Contra node. This rule takes a derivation of the form
|
||||
Gamma |- False and produces |- \/~Gamma. */
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -1364,6 +1364,18 @@ public:
|
|||
return eq2;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
bool get_store_array(const ast &t, ast &res){
|
||||
if(op(t) == Store){
|
||||
res = t;
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
int nargs = num_args(t);
|
||||
for(int i = 0; i < nargs; i++)
|
||||
if(get_store_array(arg(t,i),res))
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// translate a Z3 proof term into interpolating proof system
|
||||
|
||||
Iproof::node translate_main(ast proof, bool expect_clause = true){
|
||||
|
@ -1578,9 +1590,13 @@ public:
|
|||
throw unsupported();
|
||||
}
|
||||
break;
|
||||
case ArrayTheory: // nothing fancy for this
|
||||
res = iproof->make_axiom(lits);
|
||||
case ArrayTheory: {// nothing fancy for this
|
||||
ast store_array;
|
||||
if(!get_store_array(con,store_array))
|
||||
throw unsupported();
|
||||
res = iproof->make_axiom(lits,ast_scope(store_array));
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
default:
|
||||
throw unsupported();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -472,7 +472,7 @@ static proof_ref extract_proof(dl_interface *d, Solver::Counterexample &cex) {
|
|||
expr conc = f(args);
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
::vector<proof *> pprems;
|
||||
::vector< ::proof *> pprems;
|
||||
for(unsigned i = 0; i < prems.size(); i++)
|
||||
pprems.push_back(prems[i].get());
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue