mirrors/z3
3
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/Z3Prover/z3 synced 2025-04-06 09:34:08 +00:00
Code Activity

fix mixup between constraint indices and lpvar explanations fixes various newly reported unsoundness bugs

Browse source 
Signed-off-by: Nikolaj Bjorner <nbjorner@microsoft.com>
This commit is contained in:
Nikolaj Bjorner 2020-05-11 13:07:28 -07:00
parent 9c972521c4
commit 81b3c440ce
4 changed files with 40 additions and 24 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

4
src/math/lp/lar_constraints.h
View file

@ -251,8 +251,8 @@ public:
std::ostream& display(std::ostream& out) const {
out << "number of constraints = " << m_constraints.size() << std::endl;
for (auto const& c : active()) {
display(out, c);
for (auto const& c : indices()) {
display(out << "(" << c << ") ", *m_constraints[c]);
}
return out;
}

4
src/math/lp/nla_basics_lemmas.cpp
View file

@ -200,7 +200,7 @@ void basics::add_fixed_zero_lemma(const monic& m, lpvar j) {
}
void basics::negate_strict_sign(new_lemma& lemma, lpvar j) {
TRACE("nla_solver_details", tout << pp_var(c(), j) << "\n";);
TRACE("nla_solver_details", tout << pp_var(c(), j) << " " << val(j).is_zero() << "\n";);
if (!val(j).is_zero()) {
int sign = nla::rat_sign(val(j));
lemma |= ineq(j, (sign == 1? llc::LE : llc::GE), 0);
@ -635,7 +635,7 @@ bool basics::basic_lemma_for_mon_neutral_monic_to_factor_model_based(const monic
new_lemma lemma(c(), __FUNCTION__);
lemma |= ineq(mon_var, llc::EQ, 0);
lemma |= ineq(term(u, rational(val(u) == -val(mon_var) ? 1 : -1), mon_var), llc::NE, 0);
lemma |= ineq(v, llc::EQ, 1);
lemma |= ineq(v, llc::EQ, 1);
lemma |= ineq(v, llc::EQ, -1);
lemma &= rm; // NSB review: is this dependency required?
lemma &= f;

53
src/math/lp/nla_core.cpp
View file

@ -1100,8 +1100,9 @@ new_lemma& new_lemma::operator|=(ineq const& ineq) {
}
new_lemma::~new_lemma() {
static int i = 0;
// code for checking lemma can be added here
TRACE("nla_solver", tout << name << "\n" << *this; );
TRACE("nla_solver", tout << name << " " << (++i) << "\n" << *this; );
}
lemma& new_lemma::current() const {
@ -1143,8 +1144,8 @@ new_lemma& new_lemma::operator&=(lpvar j) {
new_lemma& new_lemma::explain_fixed(lpvar j) {
SASSERT(c.var_is_fixed(j));
*this &= c.m_lar_solver.get_column_upper_bound_witness(j);
*this &= c.m_lar_solver.get_column_lower_bound_witness(j);
explain_existing_lower_bound(j);
explain_existing_upper_bound(j);
return *this;
}
@ -1164,21 +1165,26 @@ new_lemma& new_lemma::explain_var_separated_from_zero(lpvar j) {
SASSERT(c.var_is_separated_from_zero(j));
if (c.m_lar_solver.column_has_upper_bound(j) &&
(c.m_lar_solver.get_upper_bound(j)< lp::zero_of_type<lp::impq>()))
*this &= c.m_lar_solver.get_column_upper_bound_witness(j);
explain_existing_upper_bound(j);
else
*this &= c.m_lar_solver.get_column_lower_bound_witness(j);
explain_existing_lower_bound(j);
return *this;
}
new_lemma& new_lemma::explain_existing_lower_bound(lpvar j) {
SASSERT(c.has_lower_bound(j));
*this &= c.m_lar_solver.get_column_lower_bound_witness(j);
lp::explanation ex;
ex.add(c.m_lar_solver.get_column_lower_bound_witness(j));
*this &= ex;
TRACE("nla_solver", tout << j << ": " << *this << "\n";);
return *this;
}
new_lemma& new_lemma::explain_existing_upper_bound(lpvar j) {
SASSERT(c.has_upper_bound(j));
*this &= c.m_lar_solver.get_column_upper_bound_witness(j);
lp::explanation ex;
ex.add(c.m_lar_solver.get_column_upper_bound_witness(j));
*this &= ex;
return *this;
}
@ -1468,14 +1474,28 @@ lbool core::check(vector<lemma>& l_vec) {
}
}
if (!done())
incremental_linearization(true);
TRACE("nla_solver_details", print_terms(tout); tout << m_lar_solver.constraints(););
if (!done())
m_basics.basic_lemma(true);
if (!done() && m_lemma_vec->empty())
incremental_linearization(false);
TRACE("nla_solver", tout << "passed constraint_derived and basic lemmas\n";);
SASSERT(elists_are_consistent(true));
lbool ret = !m_lemma_vec->empty() && !lp_settings().get_cancel_flag() ? l_false : l_undef;
TRACE("nla_solver", tout << "ret = " << ret << ", lemmas count = " << m_lemma_vec->size() << "\n";);
if (l_vec.empty() && !done())
m_basics.basic_lemma(false);
if (l_vec.empty() && !done())
m_order.order_lemma();
if (l_vec.empty() && !done()) {
if (!done())
m_monotone.monotonicity_lemma();
if (!done())
m_tangents.tangent_lemma();
}
lbool ret = !l_vec.empty() && !lp_settings().get_cancel_flag() ? l_false : l_undef;
TRACE("nla_solver", tout << "ret = " << ret << ", lemmas count = " << l_vec.size() << "\n";);
IF_VERBOSE(2, if(ret == l_undef) {verbose_stream() << "Monomials\n"; print_monics(verbose_stream());});
CTRACE("nla_solver", ret == l_undef, tout << "Monomials\n"; print_monics(tout););
return ret;
@ -1840,15 +1860,10 @@ unsigned core::get_var_weight(lpvar j) const {
return k;
}
bool core::is_nl_var(lpvar j) const {
if (is_monic_var(j))
return true;
return m_emons.is_used_in_monic(j);
return is_monic_var(j) || m_emons.is_used_in_monic(j);
}
bool core::influences_nl_var(lpvar j) const {
if (lp::tv::is_term(j))
j = lp::tv::unmask_term(j);

3
src/math/lp/nla_core.h
View file

@ -90,7 +90,6 @@ class new_lemma {
char const* name;
core& c;
lemma& current() const;
lp::explanation& expl() { return current().expl(); }
public:
new_lemma(core& c, char const* name);
@ -110,6 +109,8 @@ public:
new_lemma& explain_existing_upper_bound(lpvar j);
new_lemma& explain_separation_from_zero(lpvar j);
lp::explanation& expl() { return current().expl(); }
unsigned num_ineqs() const { return current().ineqs().size(); }
};