mirror of
https://github.com/Z3Prover/z3
synced 2025-04-24 01:25:31 +00:00
Fix compiler warnings
This commit is contained in:
parent
4b6921dffb
commit
7c727ee922
6 changed files with 79 additions and 74 deletions
|
@ -158,6 +158,7 @@ void unsat_core_generalizer::operator()(lemma_ref &lemma)
|
|||
|
||||
unsigned old_sz = lemma->get_cube().size();
|
||||
unsigned old_level = lemma->level();
|
||||
(void)old_level;
|
||||
|
||||
unsigned uses_level;
|
||||
expr_ref_vector core(m);
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -279,7 +279,7 @@ void itp_solver::get_itp_core (expr_ref_vector &core)
|
|||
else
|
||||
{
|
||||
proof_ref res(get_proof(),m);
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
// new code
|
||||
if (m_old_hyp_reducer)
|
||||
{
|
||||
|
@ -290,10 +290,10 @@ void itp_solver::get_itp_core (expr_ref_vector &core)
|
|||
verbose_stream() << "\nStats before transformation:";
|
||||
iuc_before.print_farkas_stats();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
proof_utils::reduce_hypotheses(res);
|
||||
proof_utils::permute_unit_resolution(res);
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
if (m_print_farkas_stats)
|
||||
{
|
||||
iuc_proof iuc_after(m, res.get(), B);
|
||||
|
@ -310,13 +310,13 @@ void itp_solver::get_itp_core (expr_ref_vector &core)
|
|||
verbose_stream() << "\nStats before transformation:";
|
||||
iuc_before.print_farkas_stats();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
theory_axiom_reducer ta_reducer(m);
|
||||
proof_ref pr_without_theory_lemmas = ta_reducer.reduce(res.get());
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
hypothesis_reducer hyp_reducer(m);
|
||||
proof_ref pr_with_less_hypothesis = hyp_reducer.reduce(pr_without_theory_lemmas);
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
if (m_print_farkas_stats)
|
||||
{
|
||||
iuc_proof iuc_after(m, pr_with_less_hypothesis.get(), B);
|
||||
|
@ -328,9 +328,9 @@ void itp_solver::get_itp_core (expr_ref_vector &core)
|
|||
|
||||
// construct proof object with contains partition information
|
||||
iuc_proof iuc_pr(m, res, B);
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
// configure learner
|
||||
unsat_core_learner learner(m, iuc_pr, m_print_farkas_stats, m_iuc_debug_proof);
|
||||
unsat_core_learner learner(m, iuc_pr);
|
||||
|
||||
if (m_iuc_arith == 0 || m_iuc_arith > 3)
|
||||
{
|
||||
|
@ -352,7 +352,7 @@ void itp_solver::get_itp_core (expr_ref_vector &core)
|
|||
unsat_core_plugin_farkas_lemma_bounded* plugin_farkas_lemma_bounded = alloc(unsat_core_plugin_farkas_lemma_bounded, learner,m);
|
||||
learner.register_plugin(plugin_farkas_lemma_bounded);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
if (m_iuc == 2)
|
||||
{
|
||||
unsat_core_plugin_min_cut* plugin_min_cut = alloc(unsat_core_plugin_min_cut, learner, m);
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -61,7 +61,6 @@ private:
|
|||
unsigned m_iuc;
|
||||
unsigned m_iuc_arith;
|
||||
bool m_print_farkas_stats;
|
||||
bool m_iuc_debug_proof;
|
||||
bool m_old_hyp_reducer;
|
||||
bool is_proxy(expr *e, app_ref &def);
|
||||
void undo_proxies_in_core(ptr_vector<expr> &v);
|
||||
|
@ -69,7 +68,7 @@ private:
|
|||
app* fresh_proxy();
|
||||
void elim_proxies(expr_ref_vector &v);
|
||||
public:
|
||||
itp_solver(solver &solver, unsigned iuc, unsigned iuc_arith, bool print_farkas_stats, bool iuc_debug_proof, bool old_hyp_reducer, bool split_literals = false) :
|
||||
itp_solver(solver &solver, unsigned iuc, unsigned iuc_arith, bool print_farkas_stats, bool old_hyp_reducer, bool split_literals = false) :
|
||||
m(solver.get_manager()),
|
||||
m_solver(solver),
|
||||
m_proxies(m),
|
||||
|
@ -83,7 +82,6 @@ public:
|
|||
m_iuc(iuc),
|
||||
m_iuc_arith(iuc_arith),
|
||||
m_print_farkas_stats(print_farkas_stats),
|
||||
m_iuc_debug_proof(iuc_debug_proof),
|
||||
m_old_hyp_reducer(old_hyp_reducer)
|
||||
{}
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ Revision History:
|
|||
#include "muz/base/dl_util.h"
|
||||
|
||||
namespace spacer {
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
// arith lemmas: second parameter specifies exact type of lemma, could be "farkas", "triangle-eq", "eq-propagate", "assign-bounds", maybe also something else
|
||||
bool is_arith_lemma(ast_manager& m, proof* pr)
|
||||
{
|
||||
|
@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ namespace spacer {
|
|||
}
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
bool is_farkas_lemma(ast_manager& m, proof* pr)
|
||||
{
|
||||
if (pr->get_decl_kind() == PR_TH_LEMMA)
|
||||
|
@ -126,28 +126,28 @@ proof* ProofIteratorPostOrder::next()
|
|||
// open temporary dot-file
|
||||
std::string dotfile_path = "proof.dot";
|
||||
std::ofstream dotstream(dotfile_path);
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
// dump dot representation to stream
|
||||
pp_proof_dot_to_stream(m, dotstream, pr, iuc_pr);
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
// post process dot-file, TODO: factor this out to a different place
|
||||
pp_proof_post_process_dot(dotfile_path,dotstream);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
void pp_proof_dot_to_stream(ast_manager& m, std::ofstream& dotstream, proof* pr, iuc_proof* iuc_pr)
|
||||
{
|
||||
dotstream << "digraph proof { \n";
|
||||
std::unordered_map<unsigned, unsigned> id_to_small_id;
|
||||
unsigned counter = 0;
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
ProofIteratorPostOrder it2(pr, m);
|
||||
while (it2.hasNext())
|
||||
{
|
||||
proof* currentNode = it2.next();
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
SASSERT(id_to_small_id.find(currentNode->get_id()) == id_to_small_id.end());
|
||||
id_to_small_id.insert(std::make_pair(currentNode->get_id(), counter));
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
std::string color = "white";
|
||||
if (iuc_pr != nullptr)
|
||||
{
|
||||
|
@ -169,11 +169,11 @@ proof* ProofIteratorPostOrder::next()
|
|||
params_ref p;
|
||||
p.set_uint("max_depth", 4294967295u);
|
||||
p.set_uint("min_alias_size", 4294967295u);
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
std::ostringstream label_ostream;
|
||||
label_ostream << mk_pp(m.get_fact(currentNode),m,p) << "\n";
|
||||
std::string label = escape_dot(label_ostream.str());
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
// compute edge-label
|
||||
std::string edge_label = "";
|
||||
if (m.get_num_parents(currentNode) == 0)
|
||||
|
@ -223,7 +223,7 @@ proof* ProofIteratorPostOrder::next()
|
|||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
// generate entry for node in dot-file
|
||||
dotstream << "node_" << counter << " "
|
||||
<< "["
|
||||
|
@ -231,7 +231,7 @@ proof* ProofIteratorPostOrder::next()
|
|||
<< "label=\"" << edge_label << " " << label << "\", "
|
||||
<< "fillcolor=\"" << color << "\""
|
||||
<< "]\n";
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
// add entry for each edge to that node
|
||||
for (unsigned i = m.get_num_parents(currentNode); i > 0 ; --i)
|
||||
{
|
||||
|
@ -242,12 +242,12 @@ proof* ProofIteratorPostOrder::next()
|
|||
<< "node_" << counter
|
||||
<< ";\n";
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
++counter;
|
||||
}
|
||||
dotstream << "\n}" << std::endl;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
std::string escape_dot(const std::string &s)
|
||||
{
|
||||
std::string res;
|
||||
|
@ -260,7 +260,7 @@ proof* ProofIteratorPostOrder::next()
|
|||
}
|
||||
return res;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
void pp_proof_post_process_dot(std::string dot_filepath, std::ofstream &dotstream)
|
||||
{
|
||||
// replace variables in the dotfiles with nicer descriptions (hack: hard coded replacement for now)
|
||||
|
@ -269,7 +269,7 @@ proof* ProofIteratorPostOrder::next()
|
|||
predicates.push_back(l1);
|
||||
std::vector<std::string> l2 = {"L2","j","m","B"};
|
||||
predicates.push_back(l2);
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
for(auto& predicate : predicates)
|
||||
{
|
||||
std::string predicate_name = predicate[0];
|
||||
|
@ -278,17 +278,17 @@ proof* ProofIteratorPostOrder::next()
|
|||
std::string new_name = predicate[i+1];
|
||||
std::string substring0 = predicate_name + "_" + std::to_string(i) + "_0";
|
||||
std::string substringN = predicate_name + "_" + std::to_string(i) + "_n";
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
std::string command0 = "sed -i '.bak' 's/" + substring0 + "/" + new_name + "/g' " + dot_filepath;
|
||||
verbose_stream() << command0 << std::endl;
|
||||
system(command0.c_str());
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
std::string commandN = "sed -i '.bak' s/" + substringN + "/" + new_name + "\\'" + "/g " + dot_filepath;
|
||||
verbose_stream() << commandN << std::endl;
|
||||
system(commandN.c_str());
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
verbose_stream() << "end of postprocessing";
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -297,20 +297,20 @@ proof* ProofIteratorPostOrder::next()
|
|||
* methods for transforming proofs
|
||||
* ====================================
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
void theory_axiom_reducer::reset()
|
||||
{
|
||||
m_cache.reset();
|
||||
m_pinned.reset();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
proof_ref theory_axiom_reducer::reduce(proof* pr)
|
||||
{
|
||||
ProofIteratorPostOrder pit(pr, m);
|
||||
while (pit.hasNext())
|
||||
{
|
||||
proof* p = pit.next();
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
if (m.get_num_parents(p) == 0 && is_arith_lemma(m, p))
|
||||
{
|
||||
// we have an arith-theory-axiom and want to get rid of it
|
||||
|
@ -321,7 +321,7 @@ proof* ProofIteratorPostOrder::next()
|
|||
for (unsigned i = 0, sz = cls_fact->get_num_args(); i < sz; ++i)
|
||||
{ cls.push_back(cls_fact->get_arg(i)); }
|
||||
} else { cls.push_back(cls_fact); }
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
// 1a) create hypothesis'
|
||||
ptr_buffer<proof> hyps;
|
||||
for (unsigned i=0; i < cls.size(); ++i)
|
||||
|
@ -331,7 +331,7 @@ proof* ProofIteratorPostOrder::next()
|
|||
m_pinned.push_back(hyp);
|
||||
hyps.push_back(hyp);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
// 1b) create farkas lemma: need to rebuild parameters since mk_th_lemma adds tid as first parameter
|
||||
unsigned num_params = p->get_decl()->get_num_parameters();
|
||||
parameter const* params = p->get_decl()->get_parameters();
|
||||
|
@ -339,14 +339,14 @@ proof* ProofIteratorPostOrder::next()
|
|||
for (unsigned i = 1; i < num_params; ++i) {
|
||||
parameters.push_back(params[i]);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
SASSERT(params[0].is_symbol());
|
||||
family_id tid = m.mk_family_id(params[0].get_symbol());
|
||||
SASSERT(tid != null_family_id);
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
proof* th_lemma = m.mk_th_lemma(tid, m.mk_false(),hyps.size(), hyps.c_ptr(), num_params-1, parameters.c_ptr());
|
||||
SASSERT(is_arith_lemma(m, th_lemma));
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
// 1c) create lemma
|
||||
proof* res = m.mk_lemma(th_lemma, cls_fact);
|
||||
SASSERT(m.get_fact(res) == m.get_fact(p));
|
||||
|
@ -386,15 +386,14 @@ proof* ProofIteratorPostOrder::next()
|
|||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
proof* res;
|
||||
bool found = m_cache.find(pr,res);
|
||||
SASSERT(found);
|
||||
VERIFY(m_cache.find(pr,res));
|
||||
DEBUG_CODE(proof_checker pc(m);
|
||||
expr_ref_vector side(m);
|
||||
SASSERT(pc.check(res, side));
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
return proof_ref(res,m);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -408,16 +407,16 @@ proof* ProofIteratorPostOrder::next()
|
|||
m_pinned_parent_hyps.reset();
|
||||
m_pinned.reset();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
void hypothesis_reducer::compute_hypsets(proof* pr)
|
||||
{
|
||||
ptr_vector<proof> todo;
|
||||
todo.push_back(pr);
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
while (!todo.empty())
|
||||
{
|
||||
proof* p = todo.back();
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
if (m_active_hyps.contains(p))
|
||||
{
|
||||
SASSERT(m_parent_hyps.contains(p));
|
||||
|
@ -427,13 +426,13 @@ proof* ProofIteratorPostOrder::next()
|
|||
else
|
||||
{
|
||||
bool existsUnvisitedParent = false;
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
// add unprocessed premises to stack for DFS. If there is at least one unprocessed premise, don't compute the result
|
||||
// for p now, but wait until those unprocessed premises are processed.
|
||||
for (unsigned i = 0; i < m.get_num_parents(p); ++i) {
|
||||
SASSERT(m.is_proof(p->get_arg(i)));
|
||||
proof* premise = to_app(p->get_arg(i));
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
// if we haven't visited the premise yet
|
||||
if (!m_active_hyps.contains(premise))
|
||||
{
|
||||
|
@ -443,7 +442,7 @@ proof* ProofIteratorPostOrder::next()
|
|||
existsUnvisitedParent = true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
// if we already visited all premises, we can visit p too
|
||||
if (!existsUnvisitedParent)
|
||||
{
|
||||
|
@ -453,11 +452,11 @@ proof* ProofIteratorPostOrder::next()
|
|||
proof_set* active_hyps = alloc(proof_set);
|
||||
m_pinned_active_hyps.insert(active_hyps);
|
||||
m_active_hyps.insert(p, active_hyps);
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
expr_set* parent_hyps = alloc(expr_set);
|
||||
m_pinned_parent_hyps.insert(parent_hyps);
|
||||
m_parent_hyps.insert(p, parent_hyps);
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
// fill both sets
|
||||
if (m.is_hypothesis(p))
|
||||
{
|
||||
|
@ -481,7 +480,7 @@ proof* ProofIteratorPostOrder::next()
|
|||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
// collect all units that are hyp-free and are used as hypotheses somewhere
|
||||
// requires that m_active_hyps and m_parent_hyps have been computed
|
||||
void hypothesis_reducer::collect_units(proof* pr)
|
||||
|
@ -510,12 +509,12 @@ proof* ProofIteratorPostOrder::next()
|
|||
{
|
||||
compute_hypsets(pr);
|
||||
collect_units(pr);
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
proof* res = compute_transformed_proof(pr);
|
||||
SASSERT(res != nullptr);
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
proof_ref res_ref(res,m);
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
reset();
|
||||
DEBUG_CODE(proof_checker pc(m);
|
||||
expr_ref_vector side(m);
|
||||
|
@ -523,7 +522,7 @@ proof* ProofIteratorPostOrder::next()
|
|||
);
|
||||
return res_ref;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
proof* hypothesis_reducer::compute_transformed_proof(proof* pf)
|
||||
{
|
||||
proof *res = NULL;
|
||||
|
@ -559,7 +558,7 @@ proof* ProofIteratorPostOrder::next()
|
|||
if (todo_sz < todo.size()) { continue; }
|
||||
else { todo.pop_back(); }
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
// here the proof transformation begins
|
||||
// INV: whenever we visit p, active_hyps and parent_hyps have been computed for the args.
|
||||
if (m.is_hypothesis(p))
|
||||
|
@ -578,7 +577,7 @@ proof* ProofIteratorPostOrder::next()
|
|||
|
||||
// compute hypsets (have not been computed in general, since the unit can be anywhere in the proof)
|
||||
compute_hypsets(proof_of_unit);
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
// if the transformation doesn't create a cycle, perform it
|
||||
SASSERT(m_parent_hyps.contains(proof_of_unit));
|
||||
expr_set* parent_hyps = m_parent_hyps.find(proof_of_unit);
|
||||
|
@ -622,8 +621,8 @@ proof* ProofIteratorPostOrder::next()
|
|||
}
|
||||
|
||||
SASSERT(res);
|
||||
m_cache.insert(p, res);
|
||||
|
||||
m_cache.insert(p, res);
|
||||
|
||||
SASSERT(m_active_hyps.contains(res));
|
||||
proof_set* active_hyps = m_active_hyps.find(res);
|
||||
if (active_hyps->empty() && m.has_fact(res) && m.is_false(m.get_fact(res)))
|
||||
|
@ -634,11 +633,11 @@ proof* ProofIteratorPostOrder::next()
|
|||
UNREACHABLE();
|
||||
return nullptr;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
proof* hypothesis_reducer::mk_lemma_core(proof* premise, expr *fact)
|
||||
{
|
||||
SASSERT(m.is_false(m.get_fact(premise)));
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
SASSERT(m_active_hyps.contains(premise));
|
||||
proof_set* active_hyps = m_active_hyps.find(premise);
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -658,7 +657,7 @@ proof* ProofIteratorPostOrder::next()
|
|||
negated_hyp_fact = m.is_not(hyp_fact) ? to_app(hyp_fact)->get_arg(0) : m.mk_not(hyp_fact);
|
||||
args.push_back(negated_hyp_fact);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
expr_ref lemma(m);
|
||||
if (args.size() == 1)
|
||||
{
|
||||
|
@ -731,7 +730,7 @@ proof* ProofIteratorPostOrder::next()
|
|||
return res;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
proof* hypothesis_reducer::mk_step_core(proof* old_step, ptr_buffer<proof>& args)
|
||||
{
|
||||
// if any of the literals is false, we don't need a step
|
||||
|
@ -742,10 +741,10 @@ proof* ProofIteratorPostOrder::next()
|
|||
return args[i];
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
// otherwise build step
|
||||
args.push_back(to_app(m.get_fact(old_step))); // BUG: I guess this doesn't work with quantifiers (since they are no apps)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
SASSERT(old_step->get_decl()->get_arity() == args.size());
|
||||
proof* res = m.mk_app(old_step->get_decl(), args.size(), (expr * const*)args.c_ptr());
|
||||
m_pinned.push_back(res);
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -60,8 +60,14 @@ prop_solver::prop_solver(manager& pm, fixedpoint_params const& p, symbol const&
|
|||
m_solvers[1] = pm.mk_fresh2();
|
||||
m_fparams[1] = &pm.fparams2();
|
||||
|
||||
m_contexts[0] = alloc(spacer::itp_solver, *(m_solvers[0]), p.spacer_iuc(), p.spacer_iuc_arith(), p.spacer_print_farkas_stats(), p.spacer_iuc_debug_proof(), p.spacer_old_hyp_reducer(), p.spacer_split_farkas_literals());
|
||||
m_contexts[1] = alloc(spacer::itp_solver, *(m_solvers[1]), p.spacer_iuc(), p.spacer_iuc_arith(), p.spacer_print_farkas_stats(), p.spacer_iuc_debug_proof(), p.spacer_old_hyp_reducer(), p.spacer_split_farkas_literals());
|
||||
m_contexts[0] = alloc(spacer::itp_solver, *(m_solvers[0]), p.spacer_iuc(),
|
||||
p.spacer_iuc_arith(),
|
||||
p.spacer_old_hyp_reducer(),
|
||||
p.spacer_split_farkas_literals());
|
||||
m_contexts[1] = alloc(spacer::itp_solver, *(m_solvers[1]), p.spacer_iuc(),
|
||||
p.spacer_iuc_arith(),
|
||||
p.spacer_old_hyp_reducer(),
|
||||
p.spacer_split_farkas_literals());
|
||||
|
||||
for (unsigned i = 0; i < 2; ++i)
|
||||
{ m_contexts[i]->assert_expr(m_pm.get_background()); }
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -32,7 +32,8 @@ namespace spacer {
|
|||
typedef obj_hashtable<expr> expr_set;
|
||||
|
||||
public:
|
||||
unsat_core_learner(ast_manager& m, iuc_proof& pr, bool print_farkas_stats = false, bool iuc_debug_proof = false) : m(m), m_pr(pr), m_unsat_core(m), m_print_farkas_stats(print_farkas_stats), m_iuc_debug_proof(iuc_debug_proof) {};
|
||||
unsat_core_learner(ast_manager& m, iuc_proof& pr) :
|
||||
m(m), m_pr(pr), m_unsat_core(m) {};
|
||||
virtual ~unsat_core_learner();
|
||||
|
||||
ast_manager& m;
|
||||
|
@ -60,7 +61,7 @@ namespace spacer {
|
|||
void set_closed(proof* p, bool value);
|
||||
|
||||
bool is_b_open (proof *p);
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* adds a lemma to the unsat core
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
@ -72,7 +73,9 @@ namespace spacer {
|
|||
ptr_vector<unsat_core_plugin> m_plugins;
|
||||
ast_mark m_closed;
|
||||
|
||||
expr_ref_vector m_unsat_core; // collects the lemmas of the unsat-core, will at the end be inserted into unsat_core.
|
||||
// collects the lemmas of the unsat-core
|
||||
// will at the end be inserted into unsat_core.
|
||||
expr_ref_vector m_unsat_core;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* computes partial core for step by delegating computation to plugins
|
||||
|
@ -83,9 +86,7 @@ namespace spacer {
|
|||
* finalize computation of unsat-core
|
||||
*/
|
||||
void finalize();
|
||||
|
||||
bool m_print_farkas_stats;
|
||||
bool m_iuc_debug_proof;
|
||||
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue