mirror of
				https://github.com/Z3Prover/z3
				synced 2025-11-03 21:09:11 +00:00 
			
		
		
		
	track empty clause during pop
If a theory solver creates the empty clause it gets dropped during pop. By maintaining a variable m_empty_clause, the solver ensures that it retains the information that the search state is inconsistent.
This commit is contained in:
		
							parent
							
								
									ebb7d60c75
								
							
						
					
					
						commit
						5cecd986e2
					
				
					 3 changed files with 8 additions and 2 deletions
				
			
		| 
						 | 
				
			
			@ -75,6 +75,7 @@ namespace smt {
 | 
			
		|||
        m_phase_default(false),
 | 
			
		||||
        m_conflict(null_b_justification),
 | 
			
		||||
        m_not_l(null_literal),
 | 
			
		||||
        m_empty_clause(false),
 | 
			
		||||
        m_conflict_resolution(mk_conflict_resolution(m, *this, m_dyn_ack_manager, p, m_assigned_literals, m_watches)),
 | 
			
		||||
        m_unsat_proof(m),
 | 
			
		||||
        m_dyn_ack_manager(*this, p),
 | 
			
		||||
| 
						 | 
				
			
			@ -2395,9 +2396,10 @@ namespace smt {
 | 
			
		|||
                    m_unsat_proof = nullptr;
 | 
			
		||||
                }
 | 
			
		||||
                m_base_scopes.shrink(new_lvl);
 | 
			
		||||
                m_empty_clause = false;
 | 
			
		||||
            }
 | 
			
		||||
            else {
 | 
			
		||||
                m_conflict = null_b_justification;
 | 
			
		||||
                m_conflict = m_empty_clause ? b_justification::mk_axiom() : null_b_justification;
 | 
			
		||||
                m_not_l = null_literal;
 | 
			
		||||
            }
 | 
			
		||||
            del_clauses(m_aux_clauses, s.m_aux_clauses_lim);
 | 
			
		||||
| 
						 | 
				
			
			
 | 
			
		|||
| 
						 | 
				
			
			@ -188,9 +188,12 @@ namespace smt {
 | 
			
		|||
 | 
			
		||||
        // A conflict is usually a single justification. That is, a justification
 | 
			
		||||
        // for false. If m_not_l is not null_literal, then m_conflict is a
 | 
			
		||||
        // justification for l, and the conflict is union of m_no_l and m_conflict;
 | 
			
		||||
        // justification for l, and the conflict is union of m_not_l and m_conflict;
 | 
			
		||||
        // m_empty_clause is set to ensure that an empty clause generated in deep scope 
 | 
			
		||||
        // levels survives to the base level.
 | 
			
		||||
        b_justification             m_conflict;
 | 
			
		||||
        literal                     m_not_l;
 | 
			
		||||
        bool                        m_empty_clause;
 | 
			
		||||
        scoped_ptr<conflict_resolution> m_conflict_resolution;
 | 
			
		||||
        proof_ref                   m_unsat_proof;
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
| 
						 | 
				
			
			
 | 
			
		|||
| 
						 | 
				
			
			@ -1351,6 +1351,7 @@ namespace smt {
 | 
			
		|||
                m_justifications.push_back(j);
 | 
			
		||||
            TRACE("mk_clause", tout << "empty clause... setting conflict\n";);
 | 
			
		||||
            set_conflict(j == nullptr ? b_justification::mk_axiom() : b_justification(j));
 | 
			
		||||
            m_empty_clause = true;
 | 
			
		||||
            SASSERT(inconsistent());
 | 
			
		||||
            return nullptr;
 | 
			
		||||
        case 1:
 | 
			
		||||
| 
						 | 
				
			
			
 | 
			
		|||
		Loading…
	
	Add table
		Add a link
		
	
		Reference in a new issue