mirror of
https://github.com/Z3Prover/z3
synced 2025-04-24 01:25:31 +00:00
hypothesis_reducer: worked around propositional literals
propositional formulas (disjunctions) can appear as literals. This makes it tricky to recognize whether a formula is a unit clause when re-building unit resolution. Added work-around that identifies whether a formula is a literal based on its appearance in previous unit resolution step.
This commit is contained in:
parent
b39c532f19
commit
5a6bd5e782
2 changed files with 43 additions and 31 deletions
|
@ -363,7 +363,7 @@ proof* hypothesis_reducer::reduce_core(proof* pf) {
|
|||
else if (m.is_unit_resolution(p)) {
|
||||
// unit: reduce untis; reduce the first premise; rebuild
|
||||
// unit resolution
|
||||
res = mk_unit_resolution_core(args);
|
||||
res = mk_unit_resolution_core(p, args);
|
||||
// -- re-compute hypsets
|
||||
compute_hypsets(res);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -420,12 +420,13 @@ proof* hypothesis_reducer::mk_lemma_core(proof* premise, expr *fact) {
|
|||
return res;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
proof* hypothesis_reducer::mk_unit_resolution_core(ptr_buffer<proof>& args) {
|
||||
proof* hypothesis_reducer::mk_unit_resolution_core(proof *ures,
|
||||
ptr_buffer<proof>& args) {
|
||||
// if any literal is false, we don't need a unit resolution step
|
||||
// This can be the case due to some previous transformations
|
||||
for (unsigned i = 1, sz = args.size(); i < sz; ++i) {
|
||||
if (m.is_false(m.get_fact(args[i]))) {
|
||||
// XXX just in case
|
||||
// XXX pin just in case
|
||||
m_pinned.push_back(args[i]);
|
||||
return args[i];
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -434,48 +435,58 @@ proof* hypothesis_reducer::mk_unit_resolution_core(ptr_buffer<proof>& args) {
|
|||
proof* arg0 = args[0];
|
||||
app *fact0 = to_app(m.get_fact(arg0));
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
ptr_buffer<proof> pf_args;
|
||||
ptr_buffer<expr> pf_fact;
|
||||
|
||||
pf_args.push_back(arg0);
|
||||
|
||||
// check if fact0 can be resolved as a unit
|
||||
// this is required for handling literals with OR
|
||||
for (unsigned j = 1; j < args.size(); ++j) {
|
||||
if (m.is_complement(fact0, m.get_fact(args[j]))) {
|
||||
pf_args.push_back(args[j]);
|
||||
break;
|
||||
// compute literals to be resolved
|
||||
ptr_buffer<expr> lits;
|
||||
|
||||
// fact0 is a literal whenever the original resolution was a
|
||||
// binary resolution to an empty clause
|
||||
if (m.get_num_parents(ures) == 2 && m.is_false(m.get_fact(ures))) {
|
||||
lits.push_back(fact0);
|
||||
}
|
||||
// fact0 is a literal unless it is a dijsunction
|
||||
else if (!m.is_or(fact0)) {
|
||||
lits.push_back(fact0);
|
||||
}
|
||||
// fact0 is a literal only if it appears as a literal in the
|
||||
// original resolution
|
||||
else {
|
||||
lits.reset();
|
||||
app* ures_fact = to_app(m.get_fact(m.get_parent(ures, 0)));
|
||||
for (unsigned i = 0, sz = ures_fact->get_num_args(); i < sz; ++i) {
|
||||
if (ures_fact->get_arg(i) == fact0) {
|
||||
lits.push_back(fact0);
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (lits.empty()) {
|
||||
lits.append(fact0->get_num_args(), fact0->get_args());
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
// if failed to find a resolvent, and the fact is a disjunction,
|
||||
// attempt to resolve each disjunct
|
||||
if (pf_args.size() == 1 && m.is_or(fact0)) {
|
||||
ptr_buffer<expr> cls;
|
||||
for (unsigned i = 0, sz = fact0->get_num_args(); i < sz; ++i)
|
||||
cls.push_back(fact0->get_arg(i));
|
||||
|
||||
// -- find all literals that are resolved on
|
||||
// XXX quadratic implementation
|
||||
for (unsigned i = 0, sz = cls.size(); i < sz; ++i) {
|
||||
bool found = false;
|
||||
for (unsigned j = 1; j < args.size(); ++j) {
|
||||
if (m.is_complement(cls.get(i), m.get_fact(args[j]))) {
|
||||
found = true;
|
||||
pf_args.push_back(args[j]);
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
// -- find all literals that are resolved on
|
||||
for (unsigned i = 0, sz = lits.size(); i < sz; ++i) {
|
||||
bool found = false;
|
||||
for (unsigned j = 1; j < args.size(); ++j) {
|
||||
if (m.is_complement(lits.get(i), m.get_fact(args[j]))) {
|
||||
found = true;
|
||||
pf_args.push_back(args[j]);
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (!found) pf_fact.push_back(cls.get(i));
|
||||
}
|
||||
SASSERT(pf_fact.size() + pf_args.size() - 1 == cls.size());
|
||||
if (!found) {pf_fact.push_back(lits.get(i));}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// unit resolution got reduced to noop
|
||||
if (pf_args.size() == 1) {
|
||||
// XXX pin just in case
|
||||
m_pinned.push_back(arg0);
|
||||
|
||||
return arg0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -484,6 +495,7 @@ proof* hypothesis_reducer::mk_unit_resolution_core(ptr_buffer<proof>& args) {
|
|||
tmp = mk_or(m, pf_fact.size(), pf_fact.c_ptr());
|
||||
proof* res = m.mk_unit_resolution(pf_args.size(), pf_args.c_ptr(), tmp);
|
||||
m_pinned.push_back(res);
|
||||
|
||||
return res;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -96,7 +96,7 @@ private:
|
|||
proof* reduce_core(proof* pf);
|
||||
|
||||
proof* mk_lemma_core(proof *pf, expr *fact);
|
||||
proof* mk_unit_resolution_core(ptr_buffer<proof>& args);
|
||||
proof* mk_unit_resolution_core(proof* ures, ptr_buffer<proof>& args);
|
||||
proof* mk_proof_core(proof* old, ptr_buffer<proof>& args);
|
||||
};
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue