mirror of
https://github.com/Z3Prover/z3
synced 2025-08-21 02:30:23 +00:00
updated consequence finder to fix bug in processing enumeration types
Signed-off-by: Nikolaj Bjorner <nbjorner@microsoft.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
237fde1f76
commit
4d9aadde35
5 changed files with 112 additions and 65 deletions
|
@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ Revision History:
|
|||
--*/
|
||||
#include "smt_context.h"
|
||||
#include "ast_util.h"
|
||||
#include "datatype_decl_plugin.h"
|
||||
|
||||
namespace smt {
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -31,74 +32,85 @@ namespace smt {
|
|||
return mk_and(premises);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
void context::extract_fixed_consequences(unsigned start, obj_map<expr, expr*>& vars, uint_set const& assumptions, expr_ref_vector& conseq) {
|
||||
void context::extract_fixed_consequences(literal lit, obj_map<expr, expr*>& vars, uint_set const& assumptions, expr_ref_vector& conseq) {
|
||||
ast_manager& m = m_manager;
|
||||
datatype_util dt(m);
|
||||
expr* e1, *e2;
|
||||
expr_ref fml(m);
|
||||
if (lit == true_literal) return;
|
||||
expr* e = bool_var2expr(lit.var());
|
||||
uint_set s;
|
||||
if (assumptions.contains(lit.var())) {
|
||||
s.insert(lit.var());
|
||||
}
|
||||
else {
|
||||
b_justification js = get_justification(lit.var());
|
||||
switch (js.get_kind()) {
|
||||
case b_justification::CLAUSE: {
|
||||
clause * cls = js.get_clause();
|
||||
unsigned num_lits = cls->get_num_literals();
|
||||
for (unsigned j = 0; j < num_lits; ++j) {
|
||||
literal lit2 = cls->get_literal(j);
|
||||
if (lit2.var() != lit.var()) {
|
||||
s |= m_antecedents.find(lit2.var());
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
case b_justification::BIN_CLAUSE: {
|
||||
s |= m_antecedents.find(js.get_literal().var());
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
case b_justification::AXIOM: {
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
case b_justification::JUSTIFICATION: {
|
||||
literal_vector literals;
|
||||
m_conflict_resolution->justification2literals(js.get_justification(), literals);
|
||||
for (unsigned j = 0; j < literals.size(); ++j) {
|
||||
s |= m_antecedents.find(literals[j].var());
|
||||
}
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
m_antecedents.insert(lit.var(), s);
|
||||
TRACE("context", display_literal_verbose(tout, lit); tout << " " << s << "\n";);
|
||||
bool found = false;
|
||||
if (vars.contains(e)) {
|
||||
found = true;
|
||||
fml = lit.sign() ? m.mk_not(e) : e;
|
||||
vars.erase(e);
|
||||
}
|
||||
else if (!lit.sign() && m.is_eq(e, e1, e2)) {
|
||||
if (vars.contains(e2)) {
|
||||
std::swap(e1, e2);
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (vars.contains(e1) && m.is_value(e2)) {
|
||||
found = true;
|
||||
fml = e;
|
||||
vars.erase(e1);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
else if (!lit.sign() && is_app(e) && dt.is_recognizer(to_app(e)->get_decl())) {
|
||||
if (vars.contains(to_app(e)->get_arg(0))) {
|
||||
found = true;
|
||||
fml = m.mk_eq(to_app(e)->get_arg(0), m.mk_const(dt.get_recognizer_constructor(to_app(e)->get_decl())));
|
||||
vars.erase(to_app(e)->get_arg(0));
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (found) {
|
||||
fml = m.mk_implies(antecedent2fml(s), fml);
|
||||
conseq.push_back(fml);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
void context::extract_fixed_consequences(unsigned start, obj_map<expr, expr*>& vars, uint_set const& assumptions, expr_ref_vector& conseq) {
|
||||
pop_to_search_lvl();
|
||||
literal_vector const& lits = assigned_literals();
|
||||
unsigned sz = lits.size();
|
||||
expr* e1, *e2;
|
||||
expr_ref fml(m);
|
||||
for (unsigned i = start; i < sz; ++i) {
|
||||
literal lit = lits[i];
|
||||
if (lit == true_literal) continue;
|
||||
expr* e = bool_var2expr(lit.var());
|
||||
uint_set s;
|
||||
if (assumptions.contains(lit.var())) {
|
||||
s.insert(lit.var());
|
||||
}
|
||||
else {
|
||||
b_justification js = get_justification(lit.var());
|
||||
switch (js.get_kind()) {
|
||||
case b_justification::CLAUSE: {
|
||||
clause * cls = js.get_clause();
|
||||
unsigned num_lits = cls->get_num_literals();
|
||||
for (unsigned j = 0; j < num_lits; ++j) {
|
||||
literal lit2 = cls->get_literal(j);
|
||||
if (lit2.var() != lit.var()) {
|
||||
s |= m_antecedents.find(lit2.var());
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
case b_justification::BIN_CLAUSE: {
|
||||
s |= m_antecedents.find(js.get_literal().var());
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
case b_justification::AXIOM: {
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
case b_justification::JUSTIFICATION: {
|
||||
literal_vector literals;
|
||||
m_conflict_resolution->justification2literals(js.get_justification(), literals);
|
||||
for (unsigned j = 0; j < literals.size(); ++j) {
|
||||
s |= m_antecedents.find(literals[j].var());
|
||||
}
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
m_antecedents.insert(lit.var(), s);
|
||||
TRACE("context", display_literal_verbose(tout, lit); tout << " " << s << "\n";);
|
||||
bool found = false;
|
||||
if (vars.contains(e)) {
|
||||
found = true;
|
||||
fml = lit.sign()?m.mk_not(e):e;
|
||||
vars.erase(e);
|
||||
}
|
||||
else if (!lit.sign() && m.is_eq(e, e1, e2)) {
|
||||
if (vars.contains(e2)) {
|
||||
std::swap(e1, e2);
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (vars.contains(e1) && m.is_value(e2)) {
|
||||
found = true;
|
||||
fml = e;
|
||||
vars.erase(e1);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (found) {
|
||||
fml = m.mk_implies(antecedent2fml(s), fml);
|
||||
conseq.push_back(fml);
|
||||
}
|
||||
extract_fixed_consequences(lits[i], vars, assumptions, conseq);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -240,6 +252,7 @@ namespace smt {
|
|||
lit = literal(get_bool_var(e), m.is_true(val));
|
||||
}
|
||||
else {
|
||||
TRACE("context", tout << mk_pp(e, m) << " " << mk_pp(val, m) << "\n";);
|
||||
eq = mk_eq_atom(e, val);
|
||||
internalize_formula(eq, false);
|
||||
lit = literal(get_bool_var(eq), true);
|
||||
|
@ -259,9 +272,10 @@ namespace smt {
|
|||
}
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (get_assignment(lit) == l_true) {
|
||||
if (is_sat == l_true && get_assignment(lit) == l_true) {
|
||||
var2val.erase(e);
|
||||
unfixed.push_back(e);
|
||||
TRACE("context", tout << mk_pp(e, m) << " is unfixed\n";);
|
||||
}
|
||||
else if (get_assign_level(lit) > get_search_level()) {
|
||||
TRACE("context", tout << "Retry fixing: " << mk_pp(e, m) << "\n";);
|
||||
|
@ -305,10 +319,15 @@ namespace smt {
|
|||
<< " unfixed-deleted: " << num_unfixed
|
||||
<< ")\n";);
|
||||
}
|
||||
TRACE("context", tout << "finishing " << mk_pp(e, m) << "\n";);
|
||||
if (var2val.contains(e)) {
|
||||
TRACE("context", tout << "Fixed value to " << mk_pp(e, m) << " was not processed\n";);
|
||||
expr_ref fml(m);
|
||||
fml = m.mk_eq(e, var2val.find(e));
|
||||
if (!m_antecedents.contains(lit.var()))
|
||||
{
|
||||
extract_fixed_consequences(lit, var2val, _assumptions, conseq);
|
||||
}
|
||||
fml = m.mk_implies(antecedent2fml(m_antecedents[lit.var()]), fml);
|
||||
conseq.push_back(fml);
|
||||
var2val.erase(e);
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue