mirror of
https://github.com/Z3Prover/z3
synced 2025-04-23 17:15:31 +00:00
Merge branch 'bvsls' of https://git01.codeplex.com/z3 into opt
This commit is contained in:
commit
3ab1766588
30 changed files with 1664 additions and 838 deletions
|
@ -74,6 +74,8 @@ def_module_params('fixedpoint',
|
|||
('stratified_inlining', BOOL, False, 'DUALITY: Use stratified inlining'),
|
||||
('recursion_bound', UINT, UINT_MAX, 'DUALITY: Recursion bound for stratified inlining'),
|
||||
('profile', BOOL, False, 'DUALITY: profile run time'),
|
||||
('mbqi', BOOL, True, 'DUALITY: use model-based quantifier instantion'),
|
||||
('batch_expand', BOOL, False, 'DUALITY: use batch expansion'),
|
||||
('dump_aig', SYMBOL, '', 'Dump clauses in AIG text format (AAG) to the given file name'),
|
||||
))
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -64,20 +64,22 @@ namespace Duality {
|
|||
std::vector<expr> clauses;
|
||||
std::vector<std::vector<RPFP::label_struct> > clause_labels;
|
||||
hash_map<RPFP::Edge *,int> map; // edges to clauses
|
||||
Solver *old_rs;
|
||||
Solver::Counterexample cex;
|
||||
|
||||
duality_data(ast_manager &_m) : ctx(_m,config(params_ref())) {
|
||||
ls = 0;
|
||||
rpfp = 0;
|
||||
status = StatusNull;
|
||||
old_rs = 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
~duality_data(){
|
||||
if(old_rs)
|
||||
dealloc(old_rs);
|
||||
if(rpfp)
|
||||
dealloc(rpfp);
|
||||
if(ls)
|
||||
dealloc(ls);
|
||||
if(cex.tree)
|
||||
delete cex.tree;
|
||||
}
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -132,15 +134,18 @@ lbool dl_interface::query(::expr * query) {
|
|||
m_ctx.ensure_opened();
|
||||
|
||||
// if there is old data, get the cex and dispose (later)
|
||||
Solver::Counterexample old_cex;
|
||||
duality_data *old_data = _d;
|
||||
if(old_data)
|
||||
old_cex = old_data->cex;
|
||||
Solver *old_rs = 0;
|
||||
if(old_data){
|
||||
old_rs = old_data->old_rs;
|
||||
old_rs->GetCounterexample().swap(old_data->cex);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
scoped_proof generate_proofs_please(m_ctx.get_manager());
|
||||
|
||||
// make a new problem and solver
|
||||
_d = alloc(duality_data,m_ctx.get_manager());
|
||||
_d->ctx.set("mbqi",m_ctx.get_params().mbqi());
|
||||
_d->ls = alloc(RPFP::iZ3LogicSolver,_d->ctx);
|
||||
_d->rpfp = alloc(RPFP,_d->ls);
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -195,8 +200,9 @@ lbool dl_interface::query(::expr * query) {
|
|||
|
||||
Solver *rs = Solver::Create("duality", _d->rpfp);
|
||||
|
||||
rs->LearnFrom(old_cex); // new solver gets hints from old cex
|
||||
|
||||
if(old_rs)
|
||||
rs->LearnFrom(old_rs); // new solver gets hints from old solver
|
||||
|
||||
// set its options
|
||||
IF_VERBOSE(1, rs->SetOption("report","1"););
|
||||
rs->SetOption("full_expand",m_ctx.get_params().full_expand() ? "1" : "0");
|
||||
|
@ -204,6 +210,7 @@ lbool dl_interface::query(::expr * query) {
|
|||
rs->SetOption("feasible_edges",m_ctx.get_params().feasible_edges() ? "1" : "0");
|
||||
rs->SetOption("use_underapprox",m_ctx.get_params().use_underapprox() ? "1" : "0");
|
||||
rs->SetOption("stratified_inlining",m_ctx.get_params().stratified_inlining() ? "1" : "0");
|
||||
rs->SetOption("batch_expand",m_ctx.get_params().batch_expand() ? "1" : "0");
|
||||
unsigned rb = m_ctx.get_params().recursion_bound();
|
||||
if(rb != UINT_MAX){
|
||||
std::ostringstream os; os << rb;
|
||||
|
@ -229,15 +236,14 @@ lbool dl_interface::query(::expr * query) {
|
|||
|
||||
// save the result and counterexample if there is one
|
||||
_d->status = ans ? StatusModel : StatusRefutation;
|
||||
_d->cex = rs->GetCounterexample();
|
||||
_d->cex.swap(rs->GetCounterexample()); // take ownership of cex
|
||||
_d->old_rs = rs; // save this for later hints
|
||||
|
||||
if(old_data){
|
||||
old_data->cex.tree = 0; // we own it now
|
||||
dealloc(old_data);
|
||||
dealloc(old_data); // this deallocates the old solver if there is one
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
dealloc(rs);
|
||||
// dealloc(rs); this is now owned by data
|
||||
|
||||
// true means the RPFP problem is SAT, so the query is UNSAT
|
||||
return ans ? l_false : l_true;
|
||||
|
@ -265,18 +271,16 @@ void dl_interface::reset_statistics() {
|
|||
|
||||
static hash_set<func_decl> *local_func_decls;
|
||||
|
||||
static void print_proof(dl_interface *d, std::ostream& out, Solver::Counterexample &cex) {
|
||||
static void print_proof(dl_interface *d, std::ostream& out, RPFP *tree, RPFP::Node *root) {
|
||||
context &ctx = d->dd()->ctx;
|
||||
RPFP::Node &node = *cex.root;
|
||||
RPFP::Node &node = *root;
|
||||
RPFP::Edge &edge = *node.Outgoing;
|
||||
|
||||
// first, prove the children (that are actually used)
|
||||
|
||||
for(unsigned i = 0; i < edge.Children.size(); i++){
|
||||
if(!cex.tree->Empty(edge.Children[i])){
|
||||
Solver::Counterexample foo = cex;
|
||||
foo.root = edge.Children[i];
|
||||
print_proof(d,out,foo);
|
||||
if(!tree->Empty(edge.Children[i])){
|
||||
print_proof(d,out,tree,edge.Children[i]);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -285,7 +289,7 @@ static void print_proof(dl_interface *d, std::ostream& out, Solver::Counterexamp
|
|||
out << "(step s!" << node.number;
|
||||
out << " (" << node.Name.name();
|
||||
for(unsigned i = 0; i < edge.F.IndParams.size(); i++)
|
||||
out << " " << cex.tree->Eval(&edge,edge.F.IndParams[i]);
|
||||
out << " " << tree->Eval(&edge,edge.F.IndParams[i]);
|
||||
out << ")\n";
|
||||
|
||||
// print the rule number
|
||||
|
@ -307,8 +311,8 @@ static void print_proof(dl_interface *d, std::ostream& out, Solver::Counterexamp
|
|||
sort the_sort = t.get_quantifier_bound_sort(j);
|
||||
symbol name = t.get_quantifier_bound_name(j);
|
||||
expr skolem = ctx.constant(symbol(ctx,name),sort(ctx,the_sort));
|
||||
out << " (= " << skolem << " " << cex.tree->Eval(&edge,skolem) << ")\n";
|
||||
expr local_skolem = cex.tree->Localize(&edge,skolem);
|
||||
out << " (= " << skolem << " " << tree->Eval(&edge,skolem) << ")\n";
|
||||
expr local_skolem = tree->Localize(&edge,skolem);
|
||||
(*local_func_decls).insert(local_skolem.decl());
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -316,7 +320,7 @@ static void print_proof(dl_interface *d, std::ostream& out, Solver::Counterexamp
|
|||
|
||||
out << " (labels";
|
||||
std::vector<symbol> labels;
|
||||
cex.tree->GetLabels(&edge,labels);
|
||||
tree->GetLabels(&edge,labels);
|
||||
for(unsigned j = 0; j < labels.size(); j++){
|
||||
out << " " << labels[j];
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -328,7 +332,7 @@ static void print_proof(dl_interface *d, std::ostream& out, Solver::Counterexamp
|
|||
|
||||
out << " (ref ";
|
||||
for(unsigned i = 0; i < edge.Children.size(); i++){
|
||||
if(!cex.tree->Empty(edge.Children[i]))
|
||||
if(!tree->Empty(edge.Children[i]))
|
||||
out << " s!" << edge.Children[i]->number;
|
||||
else
|
||||
out << " true";
|
||||
|
@ -353,11 +357,11 @@ void dl_interface::display_certificate_non_const(std::ostream& out) {
|
|||
// negation of the query is the last clause -- prove it
|
||||
hash_set<func_decl> locals;
|
||||
local_func_decls = &locals;
|
||||
print_proof(this,out,_d->cex);
|
||||
print_proof(this,out,_d->cex.get_tree(),_d->cex.get_root());
|
||||
out << ")\n";
|
||||
out << "(model \n\"";
|
||||
::model mod(m_ctx.get_manager());
|
||||
model orig_model = _d->cex.tree->dualModel;
|
||||
model orig_model = _d->cex.get_tree()->dualModel;
|
||||
for(unsigned i = 0; i < orig_model.num_consts(); i++){
|
||||
func_decl cnst = orig_model.get_const_decl(i);
|
||||
if(locals.find(cnst) == locals.end()){
|
||||
|
@ -428,10 +432,10 @@ model_ref dl_interface::get_model() {
|
|||
return md;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static proof_ref extract_proof(dl_interface *d, Solver::Counterexample &cex) {
|
||||
static proof_ref extract_proof(dl_interface *d, RPFP *tree, RPFP::Node *root) {
|
||||
context &ctx = d->dd()->ctx;
|
||||
ast_manager &mgr = ctx.m();
|
||||
RPFP::Node &node = *cex.root;
|
||||
RPFP::Node &node = *root;
|
||||
RPFP::Edge &edge = *node.Outgoing;
|
||||
RPFP::Edge *orig_edge = edge.map;
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -453,21 +457,19 @@ static proof_ref extract_proof(dl_interface *d, Solver::Counterexample &cex) {
|
|||
sort the_sort = t.get_quantifier_bound_sort(j);
|
||||
symbol name = t.get_quantifier_bound_name(j);
|
||||
expr skolem = ctx.constant(symbol(ctx,name),sort(ctx,the_sort));
|
||||
expr val = cex.tree->Eval(&edge,skolem);
|
||||
expr val = tree->Eval(&edge,skolem);
|
||||
expr_ref thing(ctx.uncook(val),mgr);
|
||||
substs[0].push_back(thing);
|
||||
expr local_skolem = cex.tree->Localize(&edge,skolem);
|
||||
expr local_skolem = tree->Localize(&edge,skolem);
|
||||
(*local_func_decls).insert(local_skolem.decl());
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
svector<std::pair<unsigned, unsigned> > pos;
|
||||
for(unsigned i = 0; i < edge.Children.size(); i++){
|
||||
if(!cex.tree->Empty(edge.Children[i])){
|
||||
if(!tree->Empty(edge.Children[i])){
|
||||
pos.push_back(std::pair<unsigned,unsigned>(i+1,0));
|
||||
Solver::Counterexample foo = cex;
|
||||
foo.root = edge.Children[i];
|
||||
proof_ref prem = extract_proof(d,foo);
|
||||
proof_ref prem = extract_proof(d,tree,edge.Children[i]);
|
||||
prems.push_back(prem);
|
||||
substs.push_back(expr_ref_vector(mgr));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -476,7 +478,7 @@ static proof_ref extract_proof(dl_interface *d, Solver::Counterexample &cex) {
|
|||
func_decl f = node.Name;
|
||||
std::vector<expr> args;
|
||||
for(unsigned i = 0; i < edge.F.IndParams.size(); i++)
|
||||
args.push_back(cex.tree->Eval(&edge,edge.F.IndParams[i]));
|
||||
args.push_back(tree->Eval(&edge,edge.F.IndParams[i]));
|
||||
expr conc = f(args);
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -493,7 +495,7 @@ proof_ref dl_interface::get_proof() {
|
|||
if(_d->status == StatusRefutation){
|
||||
hash_set<func_decl> locals;
|
||||
local_func_decls = &locals;
|
||||
return extract_proof(this,_d->cex);
|
||||
return extract_proof(this,_d->cex.get_tree(),_d->cex.get_root());
|
||||
}
|
||||
else
|
||||
return proof_ref(m_ctx.get_manager());
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue