mirror of
https://github.com/Z3Prover/z3
synced 2026-02-19 15:04:42 +00:00
Standardize for-loop increments to prefix form (++i) (#8199)
* Initial plan * Convert postfix to prefix increment in for loops Co-authored-by: NikolajBjorner <3085284+NikolajBjorner@users.noreply.github.com> * Fix member variable increment conversion bug Co-authored-by: NikolajBjorner <3085284+NikolajBjorner@users.noreply.github.com> * Update API generator to produce prefix increments Co-authored-by: NikolajBjorner <3085284+NikolajBjorner@users.noreply.github.com> --------- Co-authored-by: copilot-swe-agent[bot] <198982749+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: NikolajBjorner <3085284+NikolajBjorner@users.noreply.github.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
851b8ea31c
commit
317dd92105
475 changed files with 3237 additions and 3237 deletions
|
|
@ -345,7 +345,7 @@ bool asserted_formulas::invoke(simplify_fmls& s) {
|
|||
|
||||
void asserted_formulas::display(std::ostream & out) const {
|
||||
out << "asserted formulas:\n";
|
||||
for (unsigned i = 0; i < m_formulas.size(); i++) {
|
||||
for (unsigned i = 0; i < m_formulas.size(); ++i) {
|
||||
if (i == m_qhead)
|
||||
out << "[HEAD] ==>\n";
|
||||
out << mk_pp(m_formulas[i].fml(), m) << "\n";
|
||||
|
|
@ -453,7 +453,7 @@ void asserted_formulas::nnf_cnf() {
|
|||
unsigned i = m_qhead;
|
||||
unsigned sz = m_formulas.size();
|
||||
TRACE(nnf_bug, tout << "i: " << i << " sz: " << sz << "\n";);
|
||||
for (; i < sz; i++) {
|
||||
for (; i < sz; ++i) {
|
||||
expr * n = m_formulas[i].fml();
|
||||
TRACE(nnf_bug, tout << "processing:\n" << mk_pp(n, m) << "\n";);
|
||||
proof_ref pr(m_formulas[i].pr(), m);
|
||||
|
|
@ -472,7 +472,7 @@ void asserted_formulas::nnf_cnf() {
|
|||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
unsigned sz2 = push_todo.size();
|
||||
for (unsigned k = 0; k < sz2; k++) {
|
||||
for (unsigned k = 0; k < sz2; ++k) {
|
||||
expr * n = push_todo.get(k);
|
||||
pr = nullptr;
|
||||
m_rewriter(n, r1, pr1);
|
||||
|
|
@ -491,7 +491,7 @@ void asserted_formulas::nnf_cnf() {
|
|||
void asserted_formulas::simplify_fmls::operator()() {
|
||||
vector<justified_expr> new_fmls;
|
||||
unsigned sz = af.m_formulas.size();
|
||||
for (unsigned i = af.m_qhead; i < sz; i++) {
|
||||
for (unsigned i = af.m_qhead; i < sz; ++i) {
|
||||
auto& j = af.m_formulas[i];
|
||||
expr_ref result(m);
|
||||
proof_ref result_pr(m);
|
||||
|
|
@ -548,7 +548,7 @@ void asserted_formulas::propagate_values() {
|
|||
unsigned prop = num_prop;
|
||||
TRACE(propagate_values, display(tout << "before:\n"););
|
||||
unsigned i = m_qhead;
|
||||
for (; i < sz; i++) {
|
||||
for (; i < sz; ++i) {
|
||||
prop += propagate_values(i);
|
||||
}
|
||||
flush_cache();
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -303,7 +303,7 @@ struct check_logic::imp {
|
|||
return; // nothing to check
|
||||
unsigned num_args = n->get_num_args();
|
||||
bool found_non_numeral = false;
|
||||
for (unsigned i = 0; i < num_args; i++) {
|
||||
for (unsigned i = 0; i < num_args; ++i) {
|
||||
if (!is_numeral(n->get_arg(i))) {
|
||||
if (found_non_numeral)
|
||||
fail("logic does not support nonlinear arithmetic");
|
||||
|
|
@ -337,7 +337,7 @@ struct check_logic::imp {
|
|||
if (num_args == 0)
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
expr * arg = t->get_arg(0);
|
||||
for (unsigned i = 1; i < num_args; i++) {
|
||||
for (unsigned i = 1; i < num_args; ++i) {
|
||||
if (t->get_arg(i) != arg)
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
@ -352,7 +352,7 @@ struct check_logic::imp {
|
|||
while (true) {
|
||||
expr * non_numeral = nullptr;
|
||||
unsigned num_args = t->get_num_args();
|
||||
for (unsigned i = 0; i < num_args; i++) {
|
||||
for (unsigned i = 0; i < num_args; ++i) {
|
||||
expr * arg = t->get_arg(i);
|
||||
if (is_numeral(arg))
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
|
|
@ -418,7 +418,7 @@ struct check_logic::imp {
|
|||
// Check if the arith args of n are of the form (t + k) where k is a numeral.
|
||||
void check_diff_args(app * n) {
|
||||
unsigned num_args = n->get_num_args();
|
||||
for (unsigned i = 0; i < num_args; i++) {
|
||||
for (unsigned i = 0; i < num_args; ++i) {
|
||||
if (is_arith(n))
|
||||
check_diff_arg(n);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
@ -510,7 +510,7 @@ struct check_logic::imp {
|
|||
if (arity > 0) {
|
||||
if (!m_uf && f->get_family_id() == null_family_id)
|
||||
fail("logic does not support uninterpreted functions");
|
||||
for (unsigned i = 0; i < arity; i++)
|
||||
for (unsigned i = 0; i < arity; ++i)
|
||||
check_sort(f->get_domain(i));
|
||||
}
|
||||
check_sort(f->get_range());
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -96,7 +96,7 @@ private:
|
|||
|
||||
bool has_quantifiers() const {
|
||||
unsigned sz = get_num_assertions();
|
||||
for (unsigned i = 0; i < sz; i++) {
|
||||
for (unsigned i = 0; i < sz; ++i) {
|
||||
if (::has_quantifiers(get_assertion(i)))
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ void extract_clauses_and_dependencies(goal_ref const& g, expr_ref_vector& clause
|
|||
ast_manager& m = g->m();
|
||||
expr_ref_vector clause(m);
|
||||
unsigned sz = g->size();
|
||||
for (unsigned i = 0; i < sz; i++) {
|
||||
for (unsigned i = 0; i < sz; ++i) {
|
||||
expr * f = g->form(i);
|
||||
expr_dependency * d = g->dep(i);
|
||||
if (d == nullptr || !g->unsat_core_enabled()) {
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -233,7 +233,7 @@ lbool tactic2solver::check_sat_core2(unsigned num_assumptions, expr * const * as
|
|||
for (expr* e : m_assertions) {
|
||||
g->assert_expr(e);
|
||||
}
|
||||
for (unsigned i = 0; i < num_assumptions; i++) {
|
||||
for (unsigned i = 0; i < num_assumptions; ++i) {
|
||||
proof_ref pr(m.mk_asserted(assumptions[i]), m);
|
||||
expr_dependency_ref ans(m.mk_leaf(assumptions[i]), m);
|
||||
g->assert_expr(assumptions[i], pr, ans);
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue