mirror of
https://github.com/Z3Prover/z3
synced 2025-04-13 12:28:44 +00:00
add theory case split support to smt_context
This commit is contained in:
parent
f655e1976e
commit
2f56d128b0
|
@ -62,6 +62,7 @@ namespace smt {
|
|||
m_is_diseq_tmp(0),
|
||||
m_units_to_reassert(m_manager),
|
||||
m_qhead(0),
|
||||
m_th_case_split_qhead(0),
|
||||
m_simp_qhead(0),
|
||||
m_simp_counter(0),
|
||||
m_bvar_inc(1.0),
|
||||
|
@ -339,6 +340,7 @@ namespace smt {
|
|||
|
||||
bool context::bcp() {
|
||||
SASSERT(!inconsistent());
|
||||
m_th_case_split_qhead = m_qhead;
|
||||
while (m_qhead < m_assigned_literals.size()) {
|
||||
if (get_cancel_flag()) {
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
|
@ -1768,6 +1770,8 @@ namespace smt {
|
|||
unsigned qhead = m_qhead;
|
||||
if (!bcp())
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
if (!propagate_th_case_split())
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
if (get_cancel_flag()) {
|
||||
m_qhead = qhead;
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
|
@ -2960,6 +2964,125 @@ namespace smt {
|
|||
assert_expr_core(e, pr);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
class case_split_insert_trail : public trail<context> {
|
||||
literal l;
|
||||
public:
|
||||
case_split_insert_trail(literal l):
|
||||
l(l) {
|
||||
}
|
||||
virtual void undo(context & ctx) {
|
||||
ctx.undo_th_case_split(l);
|
||||
}
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
void context::mk_th_case_split(unsigned num_lits, literal * lits) {
|
||||
TRACE("theory_case_split", display_literals_verbose(tout << "theory case split: ", num_lits, lits); tout << std::endl;);
|
||||
// If we don't use the theory case split heuristic,
|
||||
// for each pair of literals (l1, l2) we add the clause (~l1 OR ~l2)
|
||||
// to enforce the condition that more than one literal can't be
|
||||
// assigned 'true' simultaneously.
|
||||
if (!m_fparams.m_theory_case_split) {
|
||||
for (unsigned i = 0; i < num_lits; ++i) {
|
||||
for (unsigned j = i+1; j < num_lits; ++j) {
|
||||
literal l1 = lits[i];
|
||||
literal l2 = lits[j];
|
||||
literal excl[2] = {~l1, ~l2};
|
||||
justification * j_excl = 0;
|
||||
mk_clause(2, excl, j_excl);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
literal_vector new_case_split;
|
||||
for (unsigned i = 0; i < num_lits; ++i) {
|
||||
literal l = lits[i];
|
||||
SASSERT(!m_all_th_case_split_literals.contains(l.index()));
|
||||
m_all_th_case_split_literals.insert(l.index());
|
||||
push_trail(case_split_insert_trail(l));
|
||||
new_case_split.push_back(l);
|
||||
}
|
||||
m_th_case_split_sets.push_back(new_case_split);
|
||||
push_trail(push_back_vector<context, vector<literal_vector> >(m_th_case_split_sets));
|
||||
for (unsigned i = 0; i < num_lits; ++i) {
|
||||
literal l = lits[i];
|
||||
if (!m_literal2casesplitsets.contains(l.index())) {
|
||||
m_literal2casesplitsets.insert(l.index(), vector<literal_vector>());
|
||||
}
|
||||
m_literal2casesplitsets[l.index()].push_back(new_case_split);
|
||||
}
|
||||
TRACE("theory_case_split", tout << "tracking case split literal set { ";
|
||||
for (unsigned i = 0; i < num_lits; ++i) {
|
||||
tout << lits[i].index() << " ";
|
||||
}
|
||||
tout << "}" << std::endl;
|
||||
);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
void context::undo_th_case_split(literal l) {
|
||||
m_all_th_case_split_literals.remove(l.index());
|
||||
if (m_literal2casesplitsets.contains(l.index())) {
|
||||
if (!m_literal2casesplitsets[l.index()].empty()) {
|
||||
m_literal2casesplitsets[l.index()].pop_back();
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
bool context::propagate_th_case_split() {
|
||||
if (m_all_th_case_split_literals.empty())
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
|
||||
// iterate over all literals assigned since the last time this method was called,
|
||||
// not counting any literals that get assigned by this method
|
||||
// this relies on bcp() to give us its old m_qhead and therefore
|
||||
// bcp() should always be called before this method
|
||||
unsigned assigned_literal_idx = m_th_case_split_qhead;
|
||||
unsigned assigned_literal_end = m_assigned_literals.size();
|
||||
while(assigned_literal_idx < assigned_literal_end) {
|
||||
literal l = m_assigned_literals[assigned_literal_idx];
|
||||
TRACE("theory_case_split", tout << "check literal " << l.index() << std::endl; display_literal_verbose(tout, l); tout << std::endl;);
|
||||
++assigned_literal_idx;
|
||||
// check if this literal participates in any theory case split
|
||||
if (m_all_th_case_split_literals.contains(l.index())) {
|
||||
TRACE("theory_case_split", tout << "assigned literal " << l.index() << " is a theory case split literal" << std::endl;);
|
||||
// now find the sets of literals which contain l
|
||||
vector<literal_vector> case_split_sets = m_literal2casesplitsets.get(l.index(), vector<literal_vector>());
|
||||
for (vector<literal_vector>::const_iterator it = case_split_sets.begin(); it != case_split_sets.end(); ++it) {
|
||||
literal_vector case_split_set = *it;
|
||||
TRACE("theory_case_split", tout << "found case split set { ";
|
||||
for(literal_vector::iterator set_it = case_split_set.begin(); set_it != case_split_set.end(); ++set_it) {
|
||||
tout << set_it->index() << " ";
|
||||
}
|
||||
tout << "}" << std::endl;);
|
||||
for(literal_vector::iterator set_it = case_split_set.begin(); set_it != case_split_set.end(); ++set_it) {
|
||||
literal l2 = *set_it;
|
||||
if (l2 != l) {
|
||||
b_justification js(l);
|
||||
switch (get_assignment(l2)) {
|
||||
case l_false:
|
||||
TRACE("theory_case_split", tout << "case split literal " << l2.index() << " is already assigned False" << std::endl;);
|
||||
break;
|
||||
case l_undef:
|
||||
TRACE("theory_case_split", tout << "case split literal " << l2.index() << " is not assigned" << std::endl;);
|
||||
assign(~l2, js);
|
||||
break;
|
||||
case l_true:
|
||||
TRACE("theory_case_split", tout << "case split literal " << l2.index() << " is already assigned True" << std::endl;);
|
||||
assign(~l2, js);
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (inconsistent()) {
|
||||
TRACE("theory_case_split", tout << "conflict detected!" << std::endl;);
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
// if we get here without detecting a conflict, we're fine
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
bool context::reduce_assertions() {
|
||||
if (!m_asserted_formulas.inconsistent()) {
|
||||
SASSERT(at_base_level());
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -226,6 +226,16 @@ namespace smt {
|
|||
literal2assumption m_literal2assumption; // maps an expression associated with a literal to the original assumption
|
||||
expr_ref_vector m_unsat_core;
|
||||
|
||||
// -----------------------------------
|
||||
//
|
||||
// Theory case split
|
||||
//
|
||||
// -----------------------------------
|
||||
uint_set m_all_th_case_split_literals;
|
||||
vector<literal_vector> m_th_case_split_sets;
|
||||
u_map< vector<literal_vector> > m_literal2casesplitsets; // returns the case split literal sets that a literal participates in
|
||||
unsigned m_th_case_split_qhead;
|
||||
|
||||
// -----------------------------------
|
||||
//
|
||||
// Accessors
|
||||
|
@ -820,6 +830,21 @@ namespace smt {
|
|||
|
||||
void mk_th_axiom(theory_id tid, literal l1, literal l2, literal l3, unsigned num_params = 0, parameter * params = 0);
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Provide a hint to the core solver that the specified literals form a "theory case split".
|
||||
* The core solver will enforce the condition that exactly one of these literals can be
|
||||
* assigned 'true' at any time.
|
||||
* We assume that the theory solver has already asserted the disjunction of these literals
|
||||
* or some other axiom that means at least one of them must be assigned 'true'.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
void mk_th_case_split(unsigned num_lits, literal * lits);
|
||||
|
||||
public:
|
||||
|
||||
// helper function for trail
|
||||
void undo_th_case_split(literal l);
|
||||
|
||||
bool propagate_th_case_split();
|
||||
|
||||
bool_var mk_bool_var(expr * n);
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue