mirrors/z3
3
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/Z3Prover/z3 synced 2025-05-12 10:14:42 +00:00
Code Activity

fixing build break, addressing #935

Browse source 
Signed-off-by: Nikolaj Bjorner <nbjorner@microsoft.com>
This commit is contained in:
Nikolaj Bjorner 2017-03-11 18:41:36 +01:00
parent 509f7409ba
commit 228111511c
5 changed files with 64 additions and 13 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

40
src/smt/smt_context.cpp
View file

@ -304,7 +304,6 @@ namespace smt {
TRACE("assign_core", tout << (decision?"decision: ":"propagating: ") << l << " ";
display_literal_verbose(tout, l); tout << " level: " << m_scope_lvl << "\n";
display(tout, j););
SASSERT(l.var() < static_cast<int>(m_b_internalized_stack.size()));
m_assigned_literals.push_back(l);
m_assignment[l.index()] = l_true;
m_assignment[(~l).index()] = l_false;
@ -319,14 +318,23 @@ namespace smt {
d.m_phase_available = true;
d.m_phase = !l.sign();
TRACE("phase_selection", tout << "saving phase, is_pos: " << d.m_phase << " l: " << l << "\n";);
TRACE("relevancy",
tout << "is_atom: " << d.is_atom() << " is relevant: " << is_relevant_core(bool_var2expr(l.var())) << "\n";);
if (d.is_atom() && (m_fparams.m_relevancy_lvl == 0 || (m_fparams.m_relevancy_lvl == 1 && !d.is_quantifier()) || is_relevant_core(bool_var2expr(l.var()))))
tout << "is_atom: " << d.is_atom() << " is relevant: " << is_relevant_core(l) << "\n";);
if (d.is_atom() && (m_fparams.m_relevancy_lvl == 0 || (m_fparams.m_relevancy_lvl == 1 && !d.is_quantifier()) || is_relevant_core(l)))
m_atom_propagation_queue.push_back(l);
if (m_manager.has_trace_stream())
trace_assign(l, j, decision);
m_case_split_queue->assign_lit_eh(l);
// a unit is asserted at search level. Mark it as relevant.
// this addresses bug... where a literal becomes fixed to true (false)
// as a conflict gets assigned misses relevancy (and quantifier instantiation).
//
if (false && !decision && relevancy() && at_search_level() && !is_relevant_core(l)) {
mark_as_relevant(l);
}
}
bool context::bcp() {
@ -1634,7 +1642,7 @@ namespace smt {
m_atom_propagation_queue.push_back(literal(v, val == l_false));
}
}
TRACE("propagate_relevancy", tout << "marking as relevant:\n" << mk_bounded_pp(n, m_manager) << "\n";);
TRACE("propagate_relevancy", tout << "marking as relevant:\n" << mk_bounded_pp(n, m_manager) << " " << m_scope_lvl << "\n";);
#ifndef SMTCOMP
m_case_split_queue->relevant_eh(n);
#endif
@ -3737,7 +3745,9 @@ namespace smt {
// I invoke pop_scope_core instead of pop_scope because I don't want
// to reset cached generations... I need them to rebuild the literals
// of the new conflict clause.
if (relevancy()) record_relevancy(num_lits, lits);
unsigned num_bool_vars = pop_scope_core(m_scope_lvl - new_lvl);
if (relevancy()) restore_relevancy(num_lits, lits);
SASSERT(m_scope_lvl == new_lvl);
// the logical context may still be in conflict after
// clauses are reinitialized in pop_scope.
@ -3850,6 +3860,28 @@ namespace smt {
}
return false;
}
/*
\brief we record and restore relevancy information for literals in conflict clauses.
A literal may have been marked relevant within the scope that gets popped during
conflict resolution. In this case, the literal is no longer marked as relevant after
the pop. This can cause quantifier instantiation to miss relevant triggers and thereby
cause incmpleteness.
*/
void context::record_relevancy(unsigned n, literal const* lits) {
m_relevant_conflict_literals.reset();
for (unsigned i = 0; i < n; ++i) {
m_relevant_conflict_literals.push_back(is_relevant(lits[i]));
}
}
void context::restore_relevancy(unsigned n, literal const* lits) {
for (unsigned i = 0; i < n; ++i) {
if (m_relevant_conflict_literals[i] && !is_relevant(lits[i])) {
mark_as_relevant(lits[i]);
}
}
}
void context::get_relevant_labels(expr* cnstr, buffer<symbol> & result) {
if (m_fparams.m_check_at_labels) {