mirror of
https://github.com/Z3Prover/z3
synced 2025-04-08 10:25:18 +00:00
set uninitialized fields. Maybe related to #1468
Signed-off-by: Nikolaj Bjorner <nbjorner@microsoft.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
54ba25175c
commit
20d6543538
|
@ -255,9 +255,11 @@ public:
|
|||
throw interpolation_failure(msg);
|
||||
}
|
||||
catch (const iz3translation::unsupported &) {
|
||||
TRACE("iz3", tout << "unsupported\n";);
|
||||
throw interpolation_error();
|
||||
}
|
||||
catch (const iz3proof::proof_error &) {
|
||||
TRACE("iz3", tout << "proof error\n";);
|
||||
throw interpolation_error();
|
||||
}
|
||||
profiling::timer_stop("Proof translation");
|
||||
|
@ -304,9 +306,11 @@ public:
|
|||
throw interpolation_failure(msg);
|
||||
}
|
||||
catch (const iz3translation::unsupported &) {
|
||||
TRACE("iz3", tout << "unsupported\n";);
|
||||
throw interpolation_error();
|
||||
}
|
||||
catch (const iz3proof::proof_error &) {
|
||||
TRACE("iz3", tout << "proof error\n";);
|
||||
throw interpolation_error();
|
||||
}
|
||||
profiling::timer_stop("Proof translation");
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -983,6 +983,7 @@ public:
|
|||
ast get_bounded_variable(const ast &ineq, bool &lb){
|
||||
ast nineq = normalize_inequality(ineq);
|
||||
ast lhs = arg(nineq,0);
|
||||
lhs.raw();
|
||||
switch(op(lhs)){
|
||||
case Uninterpreted:
|
||||
lb = false;
|
||||
|
@ -993,10 +994,10 @@ public:
|
|||
else if(arg(lhs,0) == make_int(rational(-1)))
|
||||
lb = true;
|
||||
else
|
||||
throw unsupported();
|
||||
throw unsupported(lhs);
|
||||
return arg(lhs,1);
|
||||
default:
|
||||
throw unsupported();
|
||||
throw unsupported(lhs);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -1101,10 +1102,10 @@ public:
|
|||
rational xcoeff = get_first_coefficient(arg(x,0),xvar);
|
||||
rational ycoeff = get_first_coefficient(arg(y,0),yvar);
|
||||
if(xcoeff == rational(0) || ycoeff == rational(0) || xvar != yvar)
|
||||
throw unsupported(); // can be caused by non-linear arithmetic
|
||||
throw unsupported(x); // can be caused by non-linear arithmetic
|
||||
rational ratio = xcoeff/ycoeff;
|
||||
if(denominator(ratio) != rational(1))
|
||||
throw unsupported(); // can this ever happen?
|
||||
throw unsupported(y); // can this ever happen?
|
||||
return make_int(ratio); // better be integer!
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -1113,7 +1114,7 @@ public:
|
|||
get_assign_bounds_coeffs(proof,farkas_coeffs);
|
||||
int nargs = num_args(con);
|
||||
if(nargs != (int)(farkas_coeffs.size()))
|
||||
throw unsupported(); // should never happen
|
||||
throw unsupported(proof); // should never happen
|
||||
#if 0
|
||||
if(farkas_coeffs[0] != make_int(rational(1)))
|
||||
farkas_coeffs[0] = make_int(rational(1));
|
||||
|
@ -1237,7 +1238,7 @@ public:
|
|||
if(pr(rew) == PR_REWRITE){
|
||||
return clause; // just hope the rewrite does nothing!
|
||||
}
|
||||
throw unsupported();
|
||||
throw unsupported(rew);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -1311,7 +1312,7 @@ public:
|
|||
|
||||
ast commute_equality_iff(const ast &con){
|
||||
if(op(con) != Iff || op(arg(con,0)) != Equal)
|
||||
throw unsupported();
|
||||
throw unsupported(con);
|
||||
return make(Iff,commute_equality(arg(con,0)),commute_equality(arg(con,1)));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -1337,7 +1338,7 @@ public:
|
|||
prs.push_back(con);
|
||||
return clone(proof,prs);
|
||||
default:
|
||||
throw unsupported();
|
||||
throw unsupported(proof);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -1837,7 +1838,7 @@ public:
|
|||
for(unsigned i = 0; i < nprems; i++)
|
||||
if(sym(args[i]) == commute
|
||||
&& !(dk == PR_TRANSITIVITY || dk == PR_MODUS_PONENS || dk == PR_SYMMETRY || (dk == PR_MONOTONICITY && op(arg(con,0)) == Not)))
|
||||
throw unsupported();
|
||||
throw unsupported(proof);
|
||||
|
||||
switch(dk){
|
||||
case PR_TRANSITIVITY: {
|
||||
|
@ -1908,7 +1909,7 @@ public:
|
|||
int nargs = num_args(con);
|
||||
if(farkas_coeffs.size() != (unsigned)nargs){
|
||||
pfgoto(proof);
|
||||
throw unsupported();
|
||||
throw unsupported(proof);
|
||||
}
|
||||
for(int i = 0; i < nargs; i++){
|
||||
ast lit = mk_not(arg(con,i));
|
||||
|
@ -1946,7 +1947,7 @@ public:
|
|||
get_broken_gcd_test_coeffs(proof,farkas_coeffs);
|
||||
if(farkas_coeffs.size() != nprems){
|
||||
pfgoto(proof);
|
||||
throw unsupported();
|
||||
throw unsupported(proof);
|
||||
}
|
||||
std::vector<Iproof::node> my_prems; my_prems.resize(2);
|
||||
std::vector<ast> my_prem_cons; my_prem_cons.resize(2);
|
||||
|
@ -1969,7 +1970,7 @@ public:
|
|||
if(args.size() > 0)
|
||||
res = GomoryCutRule2Farkas(proof, conc(proof), args);
|
||||
else
|
||||
throw unsupported();
|
||||
throw unsupported(proof);
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
case EqPropagateKind: {
|
||||
|
@ -1988,7 +1989,7 @@ public:
|
|||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
default:
|
||||
throw unsupported();
|
||||
throw unsupported(proof);
|
||||
}
|
||||
break;
|
||||
case ArrayTheory: {// nothing fancy for this
|
||||
|
@ -2000,7 +2001,7 @@ public:
|
|||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
default:
|
||||
throw unsupported();
|
||||
throw unsupported(proof);
|
||||
}
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -2024,7 +2025,7 @@ public:
|
|||
if(is_local(con))
|
||||
res = args[0];
|
||||
else
|
||||
throw unsupported();
|
||||
throw unsupported(con);
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
case PR_COMMUTATIVITY: {
|
||||
|
@ -2048,7 +2049,7 @@ public:
|
|||
IF_VERBOSE(0, verbose_stream() << "Unsupported proof rule: " << expr_ref((expr*)proof.raw(), *proof.mgr()) << "\n";);
|
||||
// pfgoto(proof);
|
||||
// SASSERT(0 && "translate_main: unsupported proof rule");
|
||||
throw unsupported();
|
||||
throw unsupported(proof);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -36,7 +36,8 @@ class iz3translation : public iz3base {
|
|||
|
||||
/** This is thrown when the proof cannot be translated. */
|
||||
struct unsupported: public iz3_exception {
|
||||
unsupported(): iz3_exception("unsupported") { }
|
||||
raw_ast* m_ast;
|
||||
unsupported(ast const& a): iz3_exception("unsupported"), m_ast(a.raw()) { }
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
static iz3translation *create(iz3mgr &mgr,
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -33,6 +33,8 @@ namespace sat {
|
|||
m_frozen(false),
|
||||
m_reinit_stack(false),
|
||||
m_inact_rounds(0) {
|
||||
m_psm = 0;
|
||||
m_glue = 0;
|
||||
memcpy(m_lits, lits, sizeof(literal) * sz);
|
||||
mark_strengthened();
|
||||
SASSERT(check_approx());
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -2460,10 +2460,7 @@ namespace sat {
|
|||
// try to use cached implication if available
|
||||
literal_vector * implied_lits = m_probing.cached_implied_lits(~l);
|
||||
if (implied_lits) {
|
||||
literal_vector::iterator it = implied_lits->begin();
|
||||
literal_vector::iterator end = implied_lits->end();
|
||||
for (; it != end; ++it) {
|
||||
literal l2 = *it;
|
||||
for (literal l2 : *implied_lits) {
|
||||
// Here, we must check l0 != ~l2.
|
||||
// l \/ l2 is an implied binary clause.
|
||||
// However, it may have been deduced using a lemma that has been deleted.
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue