mirror of
https://github.com/Z3Prover/z3
synced 2025-04-24 17:45:32 +00:00
fixes to saturation
Signed-off-by: Nikolaj Bjorner <nbjorner@microsoft.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
98331c261d
commit
18e5a3a991
2 changed files with 71 additions and 87 deletions
|
@ -10,9 +10,6 @@ Author:
|
|||
Nikolaj Bjorner (nbjorner) 2021-03-19
|
||||
Jakob Rath 2021-04-6
|
||||
|
||||
TODO:
|
||||
- saturation instantiates lemmas that are used for unit propagation.
|
||||
- the unit propagated constraint should/could be added to Gamma & core and enable simpler conflict resolution.
|
||||
|
||||
TODO: preserve falsification
|
||||
- each rule selects a certain premise that is problematic,
|
||||
|
@ -21,7 +18,11 @@ TODO: preserve falsification
|
|||
|
||||
TODO:
|
||||
- remove level information from created constraints.
|
||||
-
|
||||
|
||||
TODO: when we check that 'x' is "unary":
|
||||
- in principle, 'x' could be any polynomial. However, we need to divide the lhs by x, and we don't have general polynomial division yet.
|
||||
so for now we just allow the form 'value*variable'.
|
||||
(extension to arbitrary monomials for 'x' should be fairly easy too)
|
||||
--*/
|
||||
#include "math/polysat/saturation.h"
|
||||
#include "math/polysat/solver.h"
|
||||
|
@ -53,32 +54,32 @@ namespace polysat {
|
|||
return s().m_constraints.ule(lvl, lhs, rhs);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
bool inf_saturate::push_c(conflict_core& core, signed_constraint const& c, clause_builder& reason) {
|
||||
#if 0
|
||||
TODO: check if c is already true.
|
||||
if (is_true(c))
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* Propagate c. It is added to reason and core all other literals in reason are false in current stack.
|
||||
* The lemmas outlines in the rules are valid and therefore c is implied.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
bool inf_saturate::propagate(conflict_core& core, signed_constraint& c, clause_builder& reason) {
|
||||
if (c.is_currently_true(s()))
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
core.insert(c);
|
||||
clause_ref lemma = reason.build();
|
||||
s().add_lemma(lemma);
|
||||
s().propagate_bool(c.blit(), lemma.get());
|
||||
reason.push(c);
|
||||
s().propagate_bool(c.blit(), reason.build().get());
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
bool inf_saturate::push_l(conflict_core& core, unsigned lvl, bool is_strict, pdd const& lhs, pdd const& rhs, clause_builder& reason) {
|
||||
bool inf_saturate::propagate(conflict_core& core, unsigned lvl, bool is_strict, pdd const& lhs, pdd const& rhs, clause_builder& reason) {
|
||||
signed_constraint c = ineq(lvl, is_strict, lhs, rhs);
|
||||
return push_c(core, c, reason);
|
||||
return propagate(core, c, reason);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// Add premises for Ω*(x, y)
|
||||
void inf_saturate::push_omega_bisect(clause_builder& reason, unsigned level, pdd const& px, rational x_max, pdd const& py, rational y_max) {
|
||||
void inf_saturate::push_omega_bisect(clause_builder& reason, unsigned level, pdd const& x, rational x_max, pdd const& y, rational y_max) {
|
||||
rational x_val, y_val;
|
||||
auto& pddm = px.manager();
|
||||
auto& pddm = x.manager();
|
||||
unsigned bit_size = pddm.power_of_2();
|
||||
rational bound = rational::power_of_two(bit_size);
|
||||
VERIFY(s().try_eval(px, x_val));
|
||||
VERIFY(s().try_eval(py, y_val));
|
||||
VERIFY(s().try_eval(x, x_val));
|
||||
VERIFY(s().try_eval(y, y_val));
|
||||
SASSERT(x_val * y_val < bound);
|
||||
|
||||
rational x_lo = x_val, x_hi = x_max, y_lo = y_val, y_hi = y_max;
|
||||
|
@ -118,40 +119,38 @@ namespace polysat {
|
|||
SASSERT((x_lo + 1) * y_lo >= bound);
|
||||
SASSERT(x_lo * (y_lo + 1) >= bound);
|
||||
|
||||
// inequalities are justified by current assignments to px, py
|
||||
// inequalities are justified by current assignments to x, y
|
||||
// conflict resolution should be able to pick up this as a valid justification.
|
||||
// or we resort to the same extension as in the original mul_overflow code
|
||||
// where we add explicit equality propagations from the current assignment.
|
||||
auto c1 = s().m_constraints.ule(level, px, pddm.mk_val(x_lo));
|
||||
auto c2 = s().m_constraints.ule(level, py, pddm.mk_val(y_lo));
|
||||
reason.push(c1);
|
||||
reason.push(c2);
|
||||
auto c1 = s().m_constraints.ule(level, x, pddm.mk_val(x_lo));
|
||||
auto c2 = s().m_constraints.ule(level, y, pddm.mk_val(y_lo));
|
||||
reason.push(~c1);
|
||||
reason.push(~c2);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// special case viable sets used by variables.
|
||||
void inf_saturate::push_omega(clause_builder& reason, unsigned level, pdd const& px, pdd const& py) {
|
||||
auto& pddm = px.manager();
|
||||
// determine worst case upper bounds for x, y
|
||||
// then extract premises for a non-worst-case bound.
|
||||
void inf_saturate::push_omega(clause_builder& reason, unsigned level, pdd const& x, pdd const& y) {
|
||||
auto& pddm = x.manager();
|
||||
unsigned bit_size = pddm.power_of_2();
|
||||
rational bound = rational::power_of_two(bit_size);
|
||||
rational x_max = bound - 1;
|
||||
rational y_max = bound - 1;
|
||||
|
||||
if (px.is_var() && py.is_var()) {
|
||||
pvar x = px.var();
|
||||
pvar y = py.var();
|
||||
rational x_max = s().m_viable.max_viable(x);
|
||||
rational y_max = s().m_viable.max_viable(y);
|
||||
if (x.is_var())
|
||||
x_max = s().m_viable.max_viable(x.var());
|
||||
if (y.is_var())
|
||||
y_max = s().m_viable.max_viable(y.var());
|
||||
|
||||
if (x_max * y_max < bound) {
|
||||
// max values don't overflow, we can justify no-overflow using cjust for x, y
|
||||
for (auto c : s().m_cjust[x])
|
||||
reason.push(c);
|
||||
for (auto c : s().m_cjust[y])
|
||||
reason.push(c);
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
else
|
||||
push_omega_bisect(reason, level, px, x_max, py, y_max);
|
||||
if (x_max * y_max >= bound)
|
||||
push_omega_bisect(reason, level, x, x_max, y, y_max);
|
||||
else {
|
||||
for (auto c : s().m_cjust[y.var()])
|
||||
reason.push(~c);
|
||||
for (auto c : s().m_cjust[x.var()])
|
||||
reason.push(~c);
|
||||
}
|
||||
push_omega_bisect(reason, level, px, bound - 1, py, bound-1);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
|
@ -188,34 +187,30 @@ namespace polysat {
|
|||
return d.lhs == y && d.rhs == a * s().var(x);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* Match [coeff*x] coeff*x*Y
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
||||
bool inf_saturate::is_coeffxY(pdd const& x, pdd const& p, pdd& y) {
|
||||
pdd xy = x;
|
||||
return x.is_unary() && p.try_div(x.hi().val(), xy) && xy.factor(x.var(), 1, y);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* determine whether values of x * y is non-overflowing.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
bool inf_saturate::is_non_overflow(pdd const& x, pdd const& y) {
|
||||
rational x_val, y_val;
|
||||
if (!s().try_eval(x, x_val) || !s().try_eval(y, y_val))
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
|
||||
auto& pddm = x.manager();
|
||||
rational bound = rational::power_of_two(pddm.power_of_2());
|
||||
return x_val * y_val < bound;
|
||||
return s().try_eval(x, x_val) && s().try_eval(y, y_val) && x_val * y_val < bound;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* Match [v] v*x <= z*x
|
||||
* Match [v] v*x <= z*x with x a variable
|
||||
*/
|
||||
bool inf_saturate::is_Xy_l_XZ(pvar v, inequality const& c, pdd& x, pdd& z) {
|
||||
if (!is_xY(v, c.lhs, x))
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
|
||||
// TODO: in principle, 'x' could be any polynomial. However, we need to divide the lhs by x, and we don't have general polynomial division yet.
|
||||
// so for now we just allow the form 'value*variable'.
|
||||
// (extension to arbitrary monomials for 'x' should be fairly easy too)
|
||||
if (!x.is_unary())
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
rational x_coeff = x.hi().val();
|
||||
pdd xz = x;
|
||||
return c.rhs.try_div(x_coeff, xz) && xz.factor(x.var(), 1, z);
|
||||
return is_xY(v, c.lhs, x) && is_coeffxY(x, c.rhs, z);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
bool inf_saturate::verify_Xy_l_XZ(pvar v, inequality const& c, pdd const& x, pdd const& z) {
|
||||
|
@ -223,21 +218,10 @@ namespace polysat {
|
|||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* Match [z] yx <= zx
|
||||
* Match [z] yx <= zx with x a variable
|
||||
*/
|
||||
bool inf_saturate::is_YX_l_zX(pvar z, inequality const& c, pdd& x, pdd& y) {
|
||||
if (!is_xY(z, c.rhs, x))
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
// TODO: in principle, 'x' could be any polynomial. However, we need to divide the lhs by x, and we don't have general polynomial division yet.
|
||||
// so for now we just allow the form 'value*variable'.
|
||||
// (extension to arbitrary monomials for 'x' should be fairly easy too)
|
||||
if (!x.is_unary())
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
|
||||
unsigned x_var = x.var();
|
||||
rational x_coeff = x.hi().val();
|
||||
pdd xy = x;
|
||||
return c.lhs.try_div(x_coeff, xy) && xy.factor(x_var, 1, y);
|
||||
return is_xY(z, c.rhs, x) && is_coeffxY(x, c.lhs, y);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
bool inf_saturate::verify_YX_l_zX(pvar z, inequality const& c, pdd const& x, pdd const& y) {
|
||||
|
@ -275,15 +259,14 @@ namespace polysat {
|
|||
unsigned const lvl = c.src->level();
|
||||
|
||||
clause_builder reason(s());
|
||||
reason.push(c);
|
||||
reason.push(~c.as_signed_constraint());
|
||||
push_omega(reason, lvl, x, y);
|
||||
return push_l(core, lvl, c.is_strict, y, z, reason);
|
||||
return propagate(core, lvl, c.is_strict, y, z, reason);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// [y] z' <= y /\ zx > yx ==> Ω*(x,y) \/ zx > z'x
|
||||
/// [y] z' <= y /\ yx <= zx ==> Ω*(x,y) \/ z'x <= zx
|
||||
bool inf_saturate::try_ugt_y(pvar v, conflict_core& core, inequality const& le_y, inequality const& yx_l_zx, pdd const& x, pdd const& z) {
|
||||
LOG_H3("Try z' <= y && zx > yx where y := v" << v);
|
||||
pdd const y = s().var(v);
|
||||
|
||||
SASSERT(is_l_v(v, le_y));
|
||||
|
@ -295,11 +278,11 @@ namespace polysat {
|
|||
pdd const& z_prime = le_y.lhs;
|
||||
|
||||
clause_builder reason(s());
|
||||
reason.push(le_y);
|
||||
reason.push(yx_l_zx);
|
||||
reason.push(~le_y.as_signed_constraint());
|
||||
reason.push(~yx_l_zx.as_signed_constraint());
|
||||
push_omega(reason, lvl, x, y);
|
||||
// z'x <= zx
|
||||
return push_l(core, lvl, yx_l_zx.is_strict || le_y.is_strict, z_prime * x, z * x, reason);
|
||||
return propagate(core, lvl, yx_l_zx.is_strict || le_y.is_strict, z_prime * x, z * x, reason);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
bool inf_saturate::try_ugt_y(pvar v, conflict_core& core, inequality const& c) {
|
||||
|
@ -321,7 +304,6 @@ namespace polysat {
|
|||
bool inf_saturate::try_y_l_ax_and_x_l_z(pvar x, conflict_core& core, inequality const& c) {
|
||||
if (!is_g_v(x, c))
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
|
||||
pdd y = s().var(x);
|
||||
pdd a = y;
|
||||
for (auto dd : core) {
|
||||
|
@ -341,10 +323,10 @@ namespace polysat {
|
|||
return false;
|
||||
unsigned const lvl = std::max(x_l_z.src->level(), y_l_ax.src->level());
|
||||
clause_builder reason(s());
|
||||
reason.push(x_l_z);
|
||||
reason.push(y_l_ax);
|
||||
reason.push(~x_l_z.as_signed_constraint());
|
||||
reason.push(~y_l_ax.as_signed_constraint());
|
||||
push_omega(reason, lvl, a, z);
|
||||
return push_l(core, lvl, x_l_z.is_strict || y_l_ax.is_strict, y, a * z, reason);
|
||||
return propagate(core, lvl, x_l_z.is_strict || y_l_ax.is_strict, y, a * z, reason);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -353,7 +335,6 @@ namespace polysat {
|
|||
bool inf_saturate::try_ugt_z(pvar z, conflict_core& core, inequality const& c) {
|
||||
if (!is_g_v(z, c))
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
|
||||
pdd y = s().var(z);
|
||||
pdd x = y;
|
||||
for (auto dd : core) {
|
||||
|
@ -372,11 +353,11 @@ namespace polysat {
|
|||
if (!is_non_overflow(x, y_prime))
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
clause_builder reason(s());
|
||||
reason.push(c);
|
||||
reason.push(d);
|
||||
reason.push(~c.as_signed_constraint());
|
||||
reason.push(~d.as_signed_constraint());
|
||||
push_omega(reason, lvl, x, y_prime);
|
||||
// yx <= y'x
|
||||
return push_l(core, lvl, c.is_strict || d.is_strict, y * x, y_prime * x, reason);
|
||||
return propagate(core, lvl, c.is_strict || d.is_strict, y * x, y_prime * x, reason);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -41,8 +41,8 @@ namespace polysat {
|
|||
void push_omega(clause_builder& reason, unsigned level, pdd const& x, pdd const& y);
|
||||
void push_omega_bisect(clause_builder& reason, unsigned level, pdd const& x, rational x_max, pdd const& y, rational y_max);
|
||||
signed_constraint ineq(unsigned level, bool strict, pdd const& lhs, pdd const& rhs);
|
||||
bool push_c(conflict_core& core, signed_constraint const& c, clause_builder& reason);
|
||||
bool push_l(conflict_core& core, unsigned level, bool strict, pdd const& lhs, pdd const& rhs, clause_builder& reason);
|
||||
bool propagate(conflict_core& core, signed_constraint& c, clause_builder& reason);
|
||||
bool propagate(conflict_core& core, unsigned level, bool strict, pdd const& lhs, pdd const& rhs, clause_builder& reason);
|
||||
|
||||
bool try_ugt_x(pvar v, conflict_core& core, inequality const& c);
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -86,6 +86,9 @@ namespace polysat {
|
|||
// a * b does not overflow
|
||||
bool is_non_overflow(pdd const& a, pdd const& b);
|
||||
|
||||
// p := coeff*x*y where coeff_x = coeff*x, x a variable
|
||||
bool is_coeffxY(pdd const& coeff_x, pdd const& p, pdd& y);
|
||||
|
||||
public:
|
||||
|
||||
bool perform(pvar v, conflict_core& core) override;
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue