3
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/YosysHQ/yosys synced 2025-06-08 15:13:24 +00:00
yosys/docs/source/yosys_internals/extending_yosys/advanced_bugpoint.rst
2025-05-23 10:52:54 +12:00

256 lines
12 KiB
ReStructuredText

Identifying the root cause of bugs
==================================
This document references Yosys internals and is intended for people interested
in solving or investigating Yosys bugs. This also applies if you are using a
fuzzing tool; fuzzers have a tendency to find many variations of the same bug,
so identifying the root cause is important for avoiding issue spam.
If you're familiar with C/C++, you might try to have a look at the source code
of the command that's failing. Even if you can't fix the problem yourself, it
can be very helpful for anyone else investigating if you're able to identify
where the issue is arising.
Finding the failing command
---------------------------
Using the ``-L`` flag can help here, allowing you to specify a file to log to,
such as ``yosys -L out.log -s script.ys``. Most commands will print a header
message when they begin; something like ``2.48. Executing HIERARCHY pass
(managing design hierarchy).`` The last header message will usually be the
failing command. There are some commands which don't print a header message, so
you may want to add ``echo on`` to the start of your script. The `echo` command
echoes each command executed, along with any arguments given to it. For the
`hierarchy` example above this might be ``yosys> hierarchy -check``.
.. note::
It may also be helpful to use the `log` command to add messages which you can
then search for either in the terminal or the logfile. This can be quite
useful if your script contains script-passes, like the
:doc:`/using_yosys/synthesis/synth`, which call many sub-commands and you're
not sure exactly which script-pass is calling the failing command.
Minimizing scripts
------------------
.. warning::
This section is intended as **advanced usage**, and generally not necessary
for normal bug reports.
If you're using a command line prompt, such as ``yosys -p 'synth_xilinx' -o
design.json design.v``, consider converting it to a script. It's generally much
easier to iterate over changes to a script in a file rather than one on the
command line, as well as being better for sharing with others.
.. code-block:: yoscrypt
:caption: example script, ``script.ys``, for prompt ``yosys -p 'synth_xilinx' -o design.json design.v``
read_verilog design.v
synth_xilinx
write_json design.json
Next up you want to remove everything *after* the error occurs. If your final
command calls sub-commands, replace it with its contents first. In the case of
the :doc:`/using_yosys/synthesis/synth`, as well as certain other script-passes,
you can use the ``-run`` option to simplify this. For example we can replace
``synth -top <top> -lut`` with the :ref:`replace_synth`. The options ``-top
<top> -lut`` can be provided to each `synth` step, or to just the step(s) where
it is relevant, as done here.
.. code-block:: yoscrypt
:caption: example replacement script for `synth` command
:name: replace_synth
synth -top <top> -run :coarse
synth -lut -run coarse:fine
synth -lut -run fine:check
synth -run check:
Say we ran :ref:`replace_synth` and were able to remove the ``synth -run
check:`` and still got our error, then we check the log and we see the last
thing before the error was ``7.2. Executing MEMORY_MAP pass (converting memories
to logic and flip-flops)``. By checking the output of ``yosys -h synth`` (or the
`synth` help page) we can see that the `memory_map` pass is called in the
``fine`` step. We can then update our script to the following:
.. code-block:: yoscrypt
:caption: example replacement script for `synth` when `memory_map` is failing
synth -top <top> -run :fine
opt -fast -full
memory_map
By giving `synth` the option ``-run :fine``, we are telling it to run from the
beginning of the script until the ``fine`` step, where we then give it the exact
commands to run. There are some cases where the commands given in the help
output are not an exact match for what is being run, but are instead a
simplification. If you find that replacing the script-pass with its contents
causes the error to disappear, or change, try calling the script-pass with
``echo on`` to see exactly what commands are being called and what options are
used.
.. warning::
Before continuing further, *back up your code*. The following steps can
remove context and lead to over-minimizing scripts, hiding underlying issues.
Check out :ref:`yosys_internals/extending_yosys/advanced_bugpoint:Why
context matters` to learn more.
When a problem is occurring many steps into a script, minimizing the design at
the start of the script isn't always enough to identify the cause of the issue.
Each extra step of the script can lead to larger sections of the input design
being needed for the specific problem to be preserved until it causes a crash.
So to find the smallest possible reproducer it can sometimes be helpful to
remove commands prior to the failure point.
The simplest way to do this is by writing out the design, resetting the current
state, and reading back the design:
.. code-block:: yoscrypt
write_rtlil <design.il>; design -reset; read_rtlil <design.il>;
In most cases, this can be inserted immediately before the failing command while
still producing the error, allowing you to :ref:`minimize your
RTLIL<using_yosys/bugpoint:minimizing rtlil designs with bugpoint>` with the
``<design.il>`` output. For our previous example with `memory_map`, if
:ref:`map_reset` still gives the same error, then we should now be able to call
``yosys design.il -p 'memory_map'`` to reproduce it.
.. code-block:: yoscrypt
:caption: resetting the design immediately before failure
:name: map_reset
synth -top <top> -run :fine
opt -fast -full
write_rtlil design.il; design -reset; read_rtlil design.il;
memory_map
If that doesn't give the error (or doesn't give the same error), then you should
try to move the write/reset/read earlier in the script until it does. If you
have no idea where exactly you should put the reset, the best way is to use a
"binary search" type approach, reducing the possible options by half after each
attempt.
.. note::
By default, `write_rtlil` doesn't include platform specific IP blocks and
other primitive cell models which are typically loaded with a ``read_verilog
-lib`` command at the start of the synthesis script. You may have to
duplicate these commands *after* the call to ``design -reset``. It is also
possible to write out *everything* with ``select =*; write_rtlil -selected
<design.il>``.
As an example, your script has 16 commands in it before failing on the 17th. If
resetting immediately before the 17th doesn't reproduce the error, try between
the 8th and 9th (8 is half of the total 16). If that produces the error then
you can remove everything before the `read_rtlil` and try reset again in the
middle of what's left, making sure to use a different name for the output file
so that you don't overwrite what you've already got. If the error isn't
produced then you need to go earlier still, so in this case you would do between
the 4th and 5th (4 is half of the previous 8). Repeat this until you can't
reduce the remaining commands any further.
A more conservative, but more involved, method is to remove or comment out
commands prior to the failing command. Each command, or group of commands, can
be disabled one at a time while checking if the error still occurs, eventually
giving the smallest subset of commands needed to take the original input through
to the error. The difficulty with this method is that depending on your design,
some commands may be necessary even if they aren't needed to reproduce the
error. For example, if your design includes ``process`` blocks, many commands
will fail unless you run the `proc` command. While this approach can do a
better job of maintaining context, it is often easier to *recover* the context
after the design has been minimized for producing the error. For more on
recovering context, checkout
:ref:`yosys_internals/extending_yosys/advanced_bugpoint:Why context matters`.
Why context matters
-------------------
Sometimes when a command is raising an error, you're seeing a symptom rather
than the underlying issue. It's possible that an earlier command may be putting
the design in an invalid state, which isn't picked up until the error is raised.
This is particularly true for the pre-packaged
:doc:`/using_yosys/synthesis/synth`, which rely on a combination of generic and
architecture specific passes. As new features are added to Yosys and more
designs are supported, the types of cells output by a pass can grow and change;
and sometimes this leads to a mismatch in what a pass is intended to handle.
If you minimized your script, and removed commands prior to the failure to get a
smaller reproducer, try to work backwards and find which commands may have
contributed to the design failing. From the minimized design you should have
some understanding of the cell or cells which are producing the error; but where
did those cells come from? The name and/or type of the cell can often point you
in the right direction:
.. code-block::
# internal cell types start with a $
# lowercase for word-level, uppercase for bit-level
$and
$_AND_
# cell types with $__ are typically intermediate cells used in techmapping
$__MUL16X16
# cell types without a $ are either user-defined or architecture specific
my_module
SB_MAC16
# object names might give you the name of the pass that created them
$procdff$1204
$memory\rom$rdmux[0][0][0]$a$1550
# or even the line number in the Yosys source
$auto$muxcover.cc:557:implement_best_cover$2152
$auto$alumacc.cc:495:replace_alu$1209
Try running the unminimized script and search the log for the names of the
objects in your minimized design. In the case of cells you can also search for
the type of the cell. Remember that calling `stat` will list all the types of
cells currently used in the design, and `select -list =*` will list the names of
of all the current objects. You can add these commands to your script, or use
an interactive terminal to run each command individually. Adding them to the
script can be more repeatable, but if it takes a long time to run to the point
you're interested in then an interactive shell session can give you more
flexibility once you reach that point. You can also add a call to the `shell`
command at any point in a script to start an interactive session at a given
point; allowing you to script any preparation steps, then come back once it's
done.
A worked example
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Say you did all the minimization and found that an error in `synth_xilinx`
occurs when a call to ``techmap -map +/xilinx/cells_map.v`` with
``MIN_MUX_INPUTS`` defined parses a `$_MUX16_` with all inputs set to ``1'x``.
You could fix the bug in ``+/xilinx/cells_map.v``, but that might only solve
this one case while leaving other problems that haven't been found yet. So you
step through the original script, calling `stat` after each step to find when
the `$_MUX16_` is added.
You find that the `$_MUX16_` is introduced by a call to `muxcover`, but all the
inputs are defined, so calling `techmap` now works as expected. From running
`bugpoint` with the failing techmap you know that the cell with index ``2297``
will fail, so you call ``select top/*$2297`` to limit to just that cell. This
can then be saved with ``design -save pre_bug`` or ``write_rtlil -selected
pre_bug.il``, so that you don't have to re-run all the earlier steps to get back
here.
Next you step through the remaining commands and call `dump` after each to find
when the inputs are disconnected. You find that ``opt -full`` has optimized
away portions of the circuit, leading to `opt_expr` setting the undriven mux
inputs to ``x``, but failing to remove the now unnecessary `$_MUX16_`. Now
you've identified a problem in `opt_expr` that affects all of the wide muxes,
and could happen in any synthesis flow, not just `synth_xilinx`.
.. seealso::
This example is taken from `YosysHQ/yosys#4590
<https://github.com/YosysHQ/yosys/issues/4590>`_ and can be reproduced with a
version of Yosys between 0.45 and 0.51.