mirror of
https://github.com/YosysHQ/yosys
synced 2025-04-24 01:25:33 +00:00
Allow attributes on individual switch cases in RTLIL.
The parser changes are slightly awkward. Consider the following IL: process $0 <point 1> switch \foo <point 2> case 1'1 assign \bar \baz <point 3> ... case end end Before this commit, attributes are valid in <point 1>, and <point 3> iff it is immediately followed by a `switch`. (They are essentially attached to the switch.) But, after this commit, and because switch cases do not have an ending delimiter, <point 3> becomes ambiguous: the attribute could attach to either the following `case`, or to the following `switch`. This isn't expressible in LALR(1) and results in a reduce/reduce conflict. To address this, attributes inside processes are now valid anywhere inside the process: in <point 1> and <point 3> a part of case body, and in <point 2> as a separate rule. As a consequence, attributes can now precede `assign`s, which is made illegal in the same way it is illegal to attach attributes to `connect`. Attributes are tracked separately from the parser state, so this does not affect collection of attributes at all, other than allowing them on `case`s. The grammar change serves purely to allow attributes in more syntactic places.
This commit is contained in:
parent
030483ffb9
commit
93bc5affd3
3 changed files with 15 additions and 5 deletions
|
@ -204,6 +204,11 @@ void ILANG_BACKEND::dump_proc_switch(std::ostream &f, std::string indent, const
|
|||
|
||||
for (auto it = sw->cases.begin(); it != sw->cases.end(); ++it)
|
||||
{
|
||||
for (auto ait = (*it)->attributes.begin(); ait != (*it)->attributes.end(); ++ait) {
|
||||
f << stringf("%s attribute %s ", indent.c_str(), ait->first.c_str());
|
||||
dump_const(f, ait->second);
|
||||
f << stringf("\n");
|
||||
}
|
||||
f << stringf("%s case ", indent.c_str());
|
||||
for (size_t i = 0; i < (*it)->compare.size(); i++) {
|
||||
if (i > 0)
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue